21 research outputs found

    Indicators of sustainable capacity building for health research: analysis of four African case studies

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Despite substantial investment in health capacity building in developing countries, evaluations of capacity building effectiveness are scarce. By analysing projects in Africa that had successfully built sustainable capacity, we aimed to identify evidence that could indicate that capacity building was likely to be sustainable.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Four projects were selected as case studies using pre-determined criteria, including the achievement of sustainable capacity. By mapping the capacity building activities in each case study onto a framework previously used for evaluating health research capacity in Ghana, we were able to identify activities that were common to all projects. We used these activities to derive indicators which could be used in other projects to monitor progress towards building sustainable research capacity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Indicators of sustainable capacity building increased in complexity as projects matured and included</p> <p>- early engagement of stakeholders; explicit plans for scale up; strategies for influencing policies; quality assessments (<it>awareness and experiential stages)</it></p> <p>- improved resources; institutionalisation of activities; innovation <it>(expansion stage)</it></p> <p>- funding for core activities secured; management and decision-making led by southern partners <it>(consolidation stage)</it>.</p> <p>Projects became sustainable after a median of 66 months. The main challenges to achieving sustainability were high turnover of staff and stakeholders, and difficulties in embedding new activities into existing systems, securing funding and influencing policy development.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our indicators of sustainable capacity building need to be tested prospectively in a variety of projects to assess their usefulness. For each project the evidence required to show that indicators have been achieved should evolve with the project and they should be determined prospectively in collaboration with stakeholders.</p

    Evaluación del desarrollo de la capacidad

    No full text
    Compiled by European Centre for Development Policy Management in cooperation with the CTA and ISNA

    A narrative review of health research capacity strengthening in low and middle-income countries: lessons for conflict-affected areas

    Get PDF
    Conducting health research in conflict-affected areas and other complex environments is difficult, yet vital. However, the capacity to undertake such research is often limited and with little translation into practice, particularly in poorer countries. There is therefore a need to strengthen health research capacity in conflict-affected countries and regions. In this narrative review, we draw together evidence from low and middle-income countries to highlight challenges to research capacity strengthening in conflict, as well as examples of good practice. We find that authorship trends in health research indicate global imbalances in research capacity, with implications for the type and priorities of research produced, equity within epistemic communities and the development of sustainable research capacity in low and middle-income countries. Yet, there is little evidence on what constitutes effective health research capacity strengthening in conflict-affected areas. There is more evidence on health research capacity strengthening in general, from which several key enablers emerge: adequate and sustained financing; effective stewardship and equitable research partnerships; mentorship of researchers of all levels; and effective linkages of research to policy and practice. Strengthening health research capacity in conflict-affected areas needs to occur at multiple levels to ensure sustainability and equity. Capacity strengthening interventions need to take into consideration the dynamics of conflict, power dynamics within research collaborations, the potential impact of technology, and the wider political environment in which they take place.</p
    corecore