Tratamiento quirúrgico de las enfermedades de transición cervicotorácica

OBJETIVO: avaliar o resultado do tratamento cirúrgico de pacientes portadores de doenças na transição cervicotorácica da coluna vertebral. MÉTODOS: foram avaliados, retrospectivamente, 20 pacientes: nove (45%) apresentavam lesões traumáticas, sete (35%) lesões neoplásicas e quatro (20%) doenças degenerativas. No grupo de pacientes com lesões traumáticas, foi realizada fixação posterior em cinco deles (55,5%), fixação anterior em um (11,1%) e abordagem combinada (anterior e posterior) em três (33,3%). Dos sete pacientes com lesões tumorais, quatro (57,1%) foram submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico pela abordagem combinada e três (42,8%) pela abordagem posterior isolada. No grupo de pacientes com doenças degenerativas da coluna vertebral, três (75%) foram tratados pela abordagem posterior e um (25%) de forma combinada. Todos os pacientes foram avaliados por meio de parâmetros clínicos (dor e déficit neurológico), radiológicos (manutenção da redução, soltura ou quebra dos implantes) e funcionais (SF-36, escala de dor e trabalho de Denis). RESULTADOS: os 20 pacientes foram seguidos por um período que variou de seis meses a 11 anos (média de 44,6 meses ± 29,02). Dos 13 pacientes que apresentavam déficit neurológico, oito apresentaram melhora do nível na escala de Frankel (61,5%) e cinco pacientes (38,4%) permaneceram com o quadro inalterado. Como complicações um paciente (5%) apresentou soltura do implante e quatro pacientes evoluíram com infecção pós-operatória (20%). Segundo as escalas de dor e trabalho de Denis, 80% dos pacientes apresentavam pouca ou nenhuma dor (P1 e P2) e 70% dos pacientes tinham retornado ao trabalho (W1, W2 e W3). Os pacientes que não apresentavam déficit neurológico (Frankel E) obtiveram escores mais altos de qualidade de vida pelo questionário SF-36, quando comparados aos escores dos pacientes que mantinham alterações neurológicas (Frankel A-D). CONCLUSÃO: o tratamento das doenças da transição cervicotorácica da coluna vertebral apresenta detalhes adicionais aos demais segmentos da coluna vertebral. Na vigência de tratamento cirúrgico, existem pontos a serem respeitados como a anatomia relacionada ao acesso cirúrgico, as características anatômicas peculiares das vértebras e a biomecânica singular desse segmento da coluna vertebral.OBJECTIVE: to assess the results of the surgical treatment of patients with disease in the cervicothoracic junction of the spine. METHODS: twenty patients were retrospectively evaluated. Nine patients (45%) had traumatic lesions, seven (35%) neoplasic lesions and four (20%) degenerative arthropathies. In the group of patients with traumatic lesions it has been accomplished the posterior fixation in five patients (55.5%), anterior fixation in one patient (11.1%) and the combined approach (anterior and posterior) in three patients (33.3%). In the seven patients with neoplasic lesions, four (57.1%) underwent to the surgical treatment through the combined approach and 3 (42.8%) through the posterior approach. In the group of patients with spinal degenerative disease, three (75%) were treated through the posterior approach and one (25%) in a combined way. The patients were evaluated on the basis of clinical (pain and neurological deficit), radiological (reduction maintenance and implant loosening or break) and functional parameters (SF-36, Denis scale of work and pain). RESULTS: twenty patients were followed-up for a period of time ranging from six months to 11 years (44.6 months ± 29.02). From 13 patients which presented neurological deficit, eight patients presented improvement in Frankel scale level (61.5%) and five patients (38.5%) remained with the same level. As complications, one patient (5%) presented implant loosening and four patients presented postoperative infection (20%). In pain and work assessment, 80% of the patients presented few or no pain (P1 and P2) through Denis scale of pain, and 70% of the patients had returned to work (W1, W2 and W3) through Denis scale of work. The patients without neurological deficit (Frankel E) presented higher scores of life quality through the SF-36 questionnaire compared to the patients who had neurological deficit (Frankel A-D). CONCLUSION: the treatment of the diseases of the cervicothoracic junction of the spine presents additional details compared to the others segments of the spine. The surgical treatment has aspects to be respected as the anatomy related to the surgical access, the peculiar anatomic characteristics of the vertebrae and the unique biomechanics of this spinal segment.OBJETIVO: evaluar el resultado del tratamiento quirúrgico de pacientes portadores de enfermedades de transición cervicotorácica de la columna vertebral. MÉTODOS: fueron retrospectivamente evaluados veinte pacientes. Nueve pacientes (45%) presentaron lesiones traumáticas, 7 (35%) lesiones neoplásicas y 4 enfermedades degenerativas (20%). En el grupo de pacientes con lesiones traumáticas fue realizada una fijación posterior en 5 pacientes (55.5%), una fijación anterior en 1 paciente (11,1%) y abordaje combinado (anterior y posterior) en 3 pacientes (33.3%). De los 7 pacientes con lesiones tumorales, cuatro (57.1%) fueron sometidos al tratamiento quirúrgico por abordaje combinado y 3 (42.8%) por abordaje posterior aislado. En el grupo de pacientes con enfermedades degenerativas de la columna vertebral, tres (75%) fueron tratados por abordaje posterior y uno de forma combinada (25%). Todos los pacientes fueron evaluados por medio de parámetros clínicos (dolor y déficit neurológico), radiológicos (mantenimiento de la reducción, soltura o quiebra de los implantes) y funcionales (SF-36, escala de dolor y trabajo de Denis). RESULTADOS: los veinte pacientes fueron seguidos por um periodo que varió de 6 meses a 11 años (promedio de 44.6 meses ± 29.02). De los 13 pacientes que presentaron déficit neurológico, ocho presentaron una mejora en el nivel de la escala de Frankel (61.5%) y cinco pacientes (38.4%) permanecieron con un cuadro inalterado. Como complicaciones un paciente (5%) presentó soltura del implante y cuatro pacientes evolucionaron con infección postoperatoria (20%). Según las escalas de dolor y el trabajo de Denis, el 80% de los pacientes presentaron poco o nada de dolor (P1 y P2) y el 70% de los pacientes regresaron al trabajo (W1, W2 y W3). Los pacientes que no presentaron déficit neurológico (Frankel E) tuvieron escores mas altos de calidad de vida por el cuestionario SF-36, cuando comparados con los pacientes con alteraciones neurológicas (Frankel A-D). CONCLUSIÓN: el tratamiento de las enfermedades de la transición cervicotorácica de la columna vertebral presenta detalles adicionales a los demás segmentos de la columna vertebral. En la vigencia al acceso quirúrgico existen puntos a ser respetados como la anatomía relacionada al acceso quirúrgico, las características anatómicas peculiares de las vértebras y biomecánica singular de ese segmento de la columna vertebral

Breast Cancer Presenting as Unilateral Arm Edema

CONTEXT: Symptomatic arm lymphedema as the presenting symptom of invasive breast carcinoma is a rare occurrence. DESIGN: We report a case of invasive breast cancer presenting with unilateral arm swelling. The patient was initially thought to have venous thrombosis. A thorough physical examination and a mammogram revealed the presence of breast cancer and associated subclinical axillary lymphadenopathy. CONCLUSION: Failure to recognize this presentation can lead to misdiagnosis or a significant delay in diagnosis and treatment

Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith–Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up

A prospective, randomized, controlled study was carried out to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with Trabecular Metal™ (TM) to the traditional Smith–Robinson (SR) procedure with autograft. The clinical results of cervical fusion with autograft from the iliac crest are typically satisfactory, but implications from the donor site are frequently reported. Alternative materials for cervical body interfusion have shown lower fusion rates. Trabecular Metal is a porous tantalum biomaterial with structure and mechanical properties similar to that of trabecular bone and with proven osteoconductivity. As much as 80 consecutive patients planned for ACDF were randomized for fusion with either TM or tricortical autograft from the iliac crest (SR) after discectomy and decompression. Digitized plain radiographic images of 78 (98%) patients were obtained preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up and were subsequently evaluated by two senior radiologists. Fusion/non-fusion was classified by visual evaluation of the A–P and lateral views in forced flexion/extension of the cervical spine and by measuring the mobility between the fused vertebrae. MRI of 20 TM cases at 2 years was successfully used to assess the decompression of the neural structures, but was not helpful in determining fusion/non-fusion. Pain intensity in the neck, arms and pelvis/hip were rated by patients on a visual analog scale (VAS) and neck function was rated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) the day before surgery and 4, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Follow-ups at 12 and 24 months were performed by an unbiased observer, when patients also assessed their global outcome. Fusion rate in the SR group was 92%, and in the TM group 69% (P < 0.05). The accuracy of the measurements was calculated to be 2.4°. Operating time was shorter for fusion with TM compared with autograft; mean times were 100 min (SD 18) and 123 min (SD 23), respectively (P = 0.001). The patients’ global assessments of their neck and arm symptoms 2 years postoperatively for the TM group were rated as 79% much better or better after fusion with TM and 75% using autograft. Pain scores and NDI scores were significantly improved in both groups when compared with baseline at all follow-ups, except for neck pain at 1 year for the TM group. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between fusion techniques or between patients who appeared radiologically fused or non-fused. There was no difference in pelvic/hip pain between patients operated on with or without autograft. In our study, Trabecular Metal showed a lower fusion rate than the Smith–Robinson technique with autograft after single-level anterior cervical fusion without plating. There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the groups. The operative time was shorter with Trabecular Metal implants

What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications

Since Böhler published the first categorization of spinal injuries based on plain radiographic examinations in 1929, numerous classifications have been proposed. Despite all these efforts, however, only a few have been tested for reliability and validity. This methodological, conceptual review summarizes that a spinal injury classification system should be clinically relevant, reliable and accurate. The clinical relevance of a classification is directly related to its content validity. The ideal content of a spinal injury classification should only include injury characteristics of the vertebral column, is primarily based on the increasingly routinely performed CT imaging, and is clearly distinctive from severity scales and treatment algorithms. Clearly defined observation and conversion criteria are crucial determinants of classification systems’ reliability and accuracy. Ideally, two principle spinal injury characteristics should be easy to discern on diagnostic images: the specific location and morphology of the injured spinal structure. Given the current evidence and diagnostic imaging technology, descriptions of the mechanisms of injury and ligamentous injury should not be included in a spinal injury classification. The presence of concomitant neurologic deficits can be integrated in a spinal injury severity scale, which in turn can be considered in a spinal injury treatment algorithm. Ideally, a validation pathway of a spinal injury classification system should be completed prior to its clinical and scientific implementation. This review provides a methodological concept which might be considered prior to the synthesis of new or modified spinal injury classifications