GPs' decision-making when prescribing medicines for breastfeeding women: Content analysis of a survey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many breastfeeding women seek medical care from general practitioners (GPs) for various health problems and GPs may consider prescribing medicines in these consultations. Prescribing medicines to a breastfeeding mother may lead to untimely cessation of breastfeeding or a breastfeeding mother may be denied medicines due to the possible risk to her infant, both of which may lead to unwanted consequences. Information on factors governing GPs' decision-making and their views in such situations is limited.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>GPs providing shared maternity care at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne were surveyed using an anonymous postal survey to determine their knowledge, attitudes and practices on medicines and breastfeeding, in 2007/2008 (n = 640). Content analysis of their response to a question concerning decision-making about the use of medicine for a breastfeeding woman was conducted. A thematic network was constructed with basic, organising and global themes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>335 (52%) GPs responded to the survey, and 253 (76%) provided information on the last time they had to decide about the use of medicine for a breastfeeding woman. Conditions reported were mastitis (24%), other infections (24%) and depressive disorders (21%). The global theme that emerged was "<it>complexity of managing risk in prescribing for breastfeeding women"</it>. The organising themes were: <it>certainty around decision-making; uncertainty around decision-making; need for drug information to be available, consistent and reliable; joint decision-making; the vulnerable "third party" </it>and <it>infant feeding decision</it>. Decision-making is a spectrum from a straight forward decision, such as treatment of mastitis, to a complicated one requiring multiple inputs and consideration. GPs use more information seeking and collaboration in decision-making when they perceive the problem to be more complex, for example, in postnatal depression.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>GPs feel that prescribing medicines for breastfeeding women is a contentious issue. They manage the risk of prescribing by gathering information and assessing the possible effects on the breastfed infant. Without evidence-based information, they sometimes recommend cessation of breastfeeding unnecessarily.</p

Fatores associados ao uso de medicamentos na gestação em primigestas no Município de Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil

Estudo transversal, envolvendo 887 primigestas com o objetivo de analisar os fatores associados ao uso de medicamentos na gestação no Município de Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil. As informações tiveram como base uma entrevista e o cartão de pré-natal. Os medicamentos foram classificados de acordo com o Sistema Anatômico Terapêutico Químico (ATC), da Organização Mundial da Saúde, e com a categoria de risco do Food and Drug Administration (Estados Unidos). A média de idade foi 21 anos, a média do uso de medicamentos foi 2,42; os medicamentos mais consumidos foram os antianêmicos (47,5%), suplementos e vitaminas (18,7%), analgésicos (13,8%) e antibióticos (10,5%). Na categorização de risco, 69,3% pertenciam à categoria A; 22,3% à B; 7,6% à C e 0,8% à D. A chance de ter sido exposta à utilização de medicamentos de risco foi maior nas primigestas na unidade B (RC = 2,10; IC95%: 1,26-3,50), na faixa etária de 19 a 24 anos (RC = 2,79; IC95%: 1,58-4,93) e com prescrição médica (RC = 1,86; IC95%: 1,18-2,95). Os medicamentos essenciais foram menos utilizados entre as mulheres com maior renda familiar (RC = 0,63; IC95%: 0,42-0,96), e que realizaram o pré-natal na rede privada (RC = 0,53; IC95%: 0,38-0,74)

Clinical pharmacology consultation: a better answer to safety issues of drug therapy during pregnancy?

PURPOSE: drug safety classifications give a very basic estimation of risk and should only be used as general guideline when assessing risk of pregnancy-related drug exposure or planning treatment. We conducted a study to assess the strength of association between both the clinical pharmacologists' risk assessment and the FDA risk categorization, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. ----- METHODS: we retrospectively reviewed records of 1,076 patients consecutively referred to the clinical pharmacology outpatient clinic for pregnancy-related drug exposure (2000-2008). Clinical pharmacologists' risk assessments were reviewed in relation to FDA drug categorization and available pregnancy outcomes. ----- RESULTS: overall, clinical pharmacologists' risk estimation was in agreement with the FDA risk categorization system in only 28% of consulted women, and in only 9% of women with high-risk exposure (FDA DX). Clinical pharmacologists' risk assessment confirming high-risk drug exposure had a better positive predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes than the FDA DX categorization (25% vs 14% respectively), while the negative predictive values were similar (92% vs 94% respectively). Clinical pharmacologists' risk assessment was a better predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with FDA risk categorization (OR 2.11 [95%CI 1.5-3.1; p < 0.001] vs OR 1.52 [95%CI 1.1-2.1; p = 0.014] respectively). ----- CONCLUSIONS: additional evaluation beyond the FDA drug classification is essential for safer and more rational drug use in pregnancy. Clinical pharmacologists who have undergone rigorous medical training are ideally placed to consult on administration of medicines in pregnant women, thus making the prescribing of treatments in that patient category substantially safer and more rational

Balancing Act: Safe and Evidence-Based Prescribing for Women of Reproductive Age

Teratogenic medications are commonly prescribed to women of reproductive age. Caring for women who may benefit from the use of teratogenic medications requires clinicians to engage patients in shared decision-making on the risks and benefits of medication use in the context of the patient's fertility goals, the implications of the patient's medical condition for a pregnancy and the risks and benefits of various contraceptive methods. Effective communication about all of these issues is essential to avoiding medication-induced birth defects. However, data suggest that such communication remains inadequate, leading some women to face unintentional exposure of a pregnancy to a teratogen, undesired pregnancy or, sometimes, the need for pregnancy termination services. This review outlines key information needed to ensure safe prescribing to women of childbearing age. It includes recommendations for changes in medical education, healthcare delivery and health policy to facilitate thoughtful prescribing and comprehensive care