A comparison of the neuroprotective efficacy of newly developed oximes (K117, K127) and currently available oxime (obidoxime) in tabun-poisoned rats

The potency of newly developed bispyridinium compounds (K117, K127) to reduce tabun-induced acute neurotoxic signs and symptoms was compared with currently available oxime (obidoxime) using functional observational battery. The neuroprotective effects of atropine alone and atropine combined with one of three bispyridinium oximes (K117, K127, obidoxime) on rats poisoned with tabun at a sublethal dose (180 μg/kg i.m.; 80% of LD50 value) were studied. Tabun-induced neurotoxicity was monitored using a functional observational battery and automatic measurement of motor activity at 24 h following tabun challenge. The results indicated that all tested oximes combined with atropine enabled tabun-poisoned rats to survive 24 h following tabun challenge while one tabun-poisoned rats died within 24 h after tabun poisoning when the rats were treated with atropine alone. Newly developed oxime K127 combined with atropine was the most effective in decreasing tabun-induced neurotoxicity in the case of sublethal poisonings among all oximes tested. Nevertheless, the differences of neuroprotective efficacy between K127 and obidoxime are not sufficient to replace obidoxime by K127 for the treatment of acute tabun poisonings

The IPCS collaborative study on neurobehavioral screening methods: I. Background and genesis

Numerous events over several years culminated in recognition of the need to explicitly evaluate the nervous system as a potential target for environmental chemicals. Based on recommendations from several international expert panels, the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) sponsored the Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods. A Steering Committee was created to oversee the project, develop the testing protocol, recruit participating laboratories and review and analyze the data. The protocol specified the tests, the chemicals (supplied from a common source) and the exposure conditions (acute and repeated dosing). Test methods were based upon existing practices in toxicological screening as well as recent advances in neurotoxicity screening. Chemicals were selected to produce different profiles of neurobehavioral effects. Considerable latitude was afforded the participating laboratories in the choice of several key variables (e.g., strain of rat, testing device for motor activity assessment) that could potentially affect the results of the experiments. The approach therefore provided a standardized yet flexible protocol for evaluating the reproducibility of neurobehavioral screening data in diverse laboratory settings. (C) 1997 Inter Press, Inc

The IPCS collaborative study on neurobehavioral screening methods: I. Background and genesis – VII. Summary and conclusions

In the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods, eight participating laboratories used a standard battery of behavioral tests to determine, in rats, the effects of seven representative chemicals following acute and repeated dosing. The results of the collaborative study indicate good agreement across laboratories with regard to the data collected in vehicle controls. It was clear, however, that some behavioral measures had significantly more variability than other tests. The laboratories also demonstrated the ability to detect known neurotoxic chemicals and identify profiles of effects that differed from non-neurotoxic agents. The results of the study suggest that appropriate training of personnel is crucial to ensure the reliability of the test battery. The results also underscore the importance of dose selection in behavioral screening studies, since it is sometimes difficult to determine the specificity of behavioral changes in animals receiving high doses of some chemicals. The collaborative study also emphasizes the need to utilize a battery of tests in screening a wide range of potential neurotoxic agents. Analysis of data from such studies poses unique challenges due to the large number of tests and test times, and the consequent possibility of false positives. Some statistical concerns may De alleviated by grouping the results from tests that measure similar functions into neurobiological domains. Although this approach improves confidence in the biological relevance of chemical-induced changes in behavior, it may also lead to false negatives. The exploration of other statistical approaches to analyze data from experiments using a test battery is encouraged. Nevertheless, results of the collaborative study strongly support the use of behavioral tests in hazard identification. (C) 1997 Intox Press, Inc

The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: II. Protocol design and testing procedures

This paper describes the development of the protocol for the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS)-sponsored Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods, including background on the methods and chemicals selected, as well as details concerning the conduct of the collaborative study, including proficiency testing, rangefinding and main study. Participating laboratories in the collaborative study received training in the conduct and scoring of the behavioral tests and each laboratory received a Video training film to train additional personnel as needed. Each of the eight laboratories that chose to participate in the study completed proficiency testing and assessed seven representative chemicals using a functional observational battery and automated motor activity assessment. The seven chemicals studied were acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, p,p'-DDT, lead acetate, parathion, toluene, and triethyl tin. Participants received coded samples of the chemicals from a common source. Each laboratory derived doses for single and repealed administration based on the determination of a within-laboratory acute "top dose." Animal strains were not standardized and laboratory conditions were standardized to a limited degree in order to judge the general utility and robustness of these procedures in a diversity of testing situations. (C) 1997 Intox Press, Inc