Retrospective cohort study of self-reported outcomes after unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to quantify the proportion of patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction who self-reported improved epiphora bilaterally following unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy and investigate predictive factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients from an Australian lacrimal clinic was performed. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age, complained of bilateral epiphora, underwent unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy between 2012 and 2022 and followed-up. Outcome groups were created by grouping self-reported epiphora improvement levels for each eye. Two-sided confidence intervals were calculated for the proportion of participants in each outcome group. Ordinal elastic net regression identified clinical features associated with outcome groups and estimated their effect sizes. RESULTS: Of 243 patients, the median post-operative follow-up duration was 3 months. Fifty-eight percent (95% CI 52-64%, n = 141) reported significant improvement (≥50% ipsilateral and any contralateral improvement), 5% (95% CI 3-9%, n = 13) reported small improvement (<50% ipsilateral and any contralateral improvement) and 26% (95% CI 20-31%, n = 62) reported ipsilateral improvement only. Eleven percent had functional or anatomical failure. Older age (OR 1.01), contralateral nasolacrimal duct narrowing (OR 1.37), contralateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction (OR 0.93) and longer follow-up time (OR 0.85) predicted outcome groups. CONCLUSIONS: After unilateral DCR, many patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction report an improvement of their symptoms bilaterally in the early postoperative period. Contralateral nasolacrimal system diagnosis, patient age and follow-up duration were associated with outcomes. Further study using validated epiphora assessment tools may quantify this observation, and we suggest a potential underlying mechanism of contralateral effects after unilateral treatment

Frequency of simultaneous nasal procedures in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

PURPOSE: To assess the frequency of simultaneous nasal procedures in powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy performed by oculoplastic surgeons. DESIGN OF STUDY: Retrospective, multicenter study. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and surgical data of consecutive endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy cases at 3 oculoplastic centers, over periods of 6, 4, and 2.2 years, respectively, were reviewed. The rates of simultaneous nasal procedures (septoplasty, turbinectomy, and polypectomy) were studied. Complication rates in the patients who had simultaneous endonasal procedures were analyzed. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-six cases (mean age: 63.2 years [16.2-94 years], women: 67.3%). Of the total cohort of patients, 14.1% required a simultaneous endonasal procedure during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy, 11.9% (range among surgeons: 5.2%-15%) required septoplasty, 1.5% required middle turbinate surgery, and 0.34% required polypectomy. Of the 81 patients with concomitant procedures, 1 had postoperative epistaxis, and 1 had an asymptomatic septal adhesion. The anatomical and functional success rates for the entire cohort were 95.6% and 87.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients undergoing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy may require concomitant endonasal procedures. Hence, endonasal lacrimal surgeons using techniques that aim to marsupialize the entire lacrimal sac may benefit from expertize in the management of concomitant nasal pathologic study.Edwin Figueira, Zaid Al Abbadi, Raman Malhotra, Geoffrey Wilcsek, and Dinesh Selv

The biogeography of the human ocular microbiota

AbstractPurpose: The human eye is composed of numerous microhabitats and knowledge of microorganisms in these habitats is significant in terms of minimising risks of contact lens inflammation/infection, exogenous endophthalmitis and understanding idiopathic ocular surface disorders. The aim of this study was to understand the communality and differences in the microbiomes of various regions of the eye. Methods: Four ocular sites were assessed including the eyelid (n = 20), conjunctiva (n = 23), ocular surface (n = 45) and facial skin (n = 16). Microbial communities were analysed by extracting total DNA from samples and sequencing the 16S ribosomal(r)RNA gene using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Sequences were quality filtered, clustered into unique sequences (zOTUs) using the UNOISE pipeline in USEARCH and taxonomically classified using SILVA. Results: A difference in bacterial richness and diversity was found between sites (P 0.05). There was a difference in bacterial community structure and composition between sites (P < 0.001). Bacterial distribution could be broadly classified into three groups - zOTUs resident on the skin and lid margin but with low abundances at other sites (Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus), zOTUs found mainly on the ocular surface (Acinetobacter, Aeribacillus) and zOTUs mostly present in the conjunctiva and lid margin (Pseudomonas). Conclusion: The microhabitats of the human eye (ocular surface, conjunctiva, lid margin and skin) have a distinct bacterial biogeography with some bacteria shared between multiple regions while other bacteria occupy a more confined niche

Biogeography of the human ocular microbiota

PurposeThe human eye is composed of numerous microhabitats. The aim of this study was to understand the communality and differences in the microbiomes of various regions of the eye.MethodsFour ocular sites from different subject groups were assessed including the eyelid margin tissue from patients with lid abnormalities (n = 20), fornix and limbus conjunctival tissue from patients with pterygia (n = 23), ocular (conjunctival) surface swabs (n = 45) and facial skin swabs (n = 16). Microbial communities were analysed by extracting total DNA from samples and sequencing the 16S ribosomal(r)RNA gene using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Sequences were quality filtered, clustered into unique sequences (zOTUs) using the UNOISE pipeline in USEARCH and taxonomically classified using SILVA.ResultsA difference in bacterial richness and diversity was found between sites (P  0.05). There was a difference in bacterial community structure and composition between sites (P < 0.001). Bacterial distribution could be broadly classified into three groups - zOTUs resident on the skin and lid margin but with low abundances at other sites (Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus), zOTUs found mainly on the ocular surface (Acinetobacter, Aeribacillus) and zOTUs mostly present in the conjunctiva and lid margin (Pseudomonas).ConclusionThe microhabitats of the human eye (ocular surface, conjunctiva, lid margin and skin) have a distinct bacterial biogeography with some bacteria shared between multiple regions while other bacteria occupy a more confined niche