Control of hyperglycaemia in paediatric intensive care (CHiP): study protocol.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that tight blood glucose (BG) control improves outcomes in critically ill adults. Children show similar hyperglycaemic responses to surgery or critical illness. However it is not known whether tight control will benefit children given maturational differences and different disease spectrum. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is an randomised open trial with two parallel groups to assess whether, for children undergoing intensive care in the UK aged <or= 16 years who are ventilated, have an arterial line in-situ and are receiving vasoactive support following injury, major surgery or in association with critical illness in whom it is anticipated such treatment will be required to continue for at least 12 hours, tight control will increase the numbers of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation at 30 days, and lead to improvement in a range of complications associated with intensive care treatment and be cost effective. Children in the tight control group will receive insulin by intravenous infusion titrated to maintain BG between 4 and 7.0 mmol/l. Children in the control group will be treated according to a standard current approach to BG management. Children will be followed up to determine vital status and healthcare resources usage between discharge and 12 months post-randomisation. Information regarding overall health status, global neurological outcome, attention and behavioural status will be sought from a subgroup with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A difference of 2 days in the number of ventilator-free days within the first 30 days post-randomisation is considered clinically important. Conservatively assuming a standard deviation of a week across both trial arms, a type I error of 1% (2-sided test), and allowing for non-compliance, a total sample size of 1000 patients would have 90% power to detect this difference. To detect effect differences between cardiac and non-cardiac patients, a target sample size of 1500 is required. An economic evaluation will assess whether the costs of achieving tight BG control are justified by subsequent reductions in hospitalisation costs. DISCUSSION: The relevance of tight glycaemic control in this population needs to be assessed formally before being accepted into standard practice

Diabetes is a Risk Factor for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Case-Control Study from Mwanza, Tanzania.

Diabetes and TB are associated, and diabetes is increasingly common in low-income countries where tuberculosis (TB) is highly endemic. However, the role of diabetes for TB has not been assessed in populations where HIV is prevalent. A case-control study was conducted in an urban population in Tanzania among culture-confirmed pulmonary TB patients and non-TB neighbourhood controls. Participants were tested for diabetes according to WHO guidelines and serum concentrations of acute phase reactants were measured. The association between diabetes and TB, and the role of HIV as an effect modifier, were examined using logistic regression. Since blood glucose levels increase during the acute phase response, we adjusted for elevated serum acute phase reactants. Among 803 cases and 350 controls the mean (SD) age was 34.8 (11.9) and 33.8 (12.0) years, and the prevalence of diabetes was 16.7% (95% CI: 14.2; 19.4) and 9.4% (6.6; 13.0), respectively. Diabetes was associated with TB (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.5; 3.4, p<0.001). However, the association depended on HIV status (interaction, p = 0.01) due to a stronger association among HIV uninfected (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.5; 11.6, p = 0.01) compared to HIV infected (OR 0.1, 95% CI: 0.01; 1.8, p = 0.13) after adjusting for age, sex, demographic factors and elevated serum acute phase reactants. Diabetes is a risk factor for TB in HIV uninfected, whereas the association in HIV infected patients needs further study. The increasing diabetes prevalence may be a threat to TB control

Early Placement of Optional Vena Cava Filter in High-Risk Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Objectives: Patients sustaining severe trauma are at high risk for the development of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). Pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis may be contraindicated early after trauma due to potential bleeding complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of early prophylactic vena cava filter (VCF) placement and subsequent retrieval in multiple injured patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Analysis of single-institution case series of consecutive patients who received a prophylactic VCF after severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale, AiS ‡ 3) between August 2003 and October 2006. Results: A total of 34 optional VCF were prophylactically placed with a median delay of 1 day after trauma (range, 0–7 days). All patients had sustained multiple injuries (median Injury Severity Score 41, range, 18–59) with severe TBI (median AiS 4, range 3–5). Median age was 41 years (range, 17–67 years). Two patients had succumbed before potential filter retrieval. Of the remaining patients, 27 (84%) had their filters uneventfully retrieved between 11 and 32 days (median, 18 days) after placement with no retrieval-related morbidity. Five VCF (16%) were left permanently. In one patient (3%) early inferior vena cava occlusion and deep venous thrombosis occurred 14 days after VCF placement. Symptomatic pulmonary embolism was observed in one patient (3%) 5 days after VCF retrieval. Overall trauma-related mortality was 9%. Conclusions: Early VCF placement may be of benefit for multiple injured patients with TBI when pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis is contraindicated. VCF retrieval is safe and feasible. Filter placement- and retrieval-related morbidity is low