4,323 research outputs found

    Second order tangent bundles of infinite dimensional manifolds

    Full text link
    The second order tangent bundle T2MT^{2}M of a smooth manifold MM consists of the equivalent classes of curves on MM that agree up to their acceleration. It is known that in the case of a finite nn-dimensional manifold MM, T2MT^{2}M becomes a vector bundle over MM if and only if MM is endowed with a linear connection. Here we extend this result to MM modeled on an arbitrarily chosen Banach space and more generally to those Fr\'{e}chet manifolds which can be obtained as projective limits of Banach manifolds. The result may have application in the study of infinite-dimensional dynamical systems.Comment: 8 page

    Admissibility and Event-Rationality

    Get PDF
    We develop an approach to providing epistemic conditions for admissible behavior in games. Instead of using lexicographic beliefs to capture infinitely less likely conjectures, we postulate that players use tie-breaking sets to help decide among strategies that are outcome-equivalent given their conjectures. A player is event-rational if she best responds to a conjecture and uses a list of subsets of the other players' strategies to break ties among outcome-equivalent strategies. Using type spaces to capture interactive beliefs, we show that common belief of event-rationality (RCBER) implies that players play strategies in S1W, that is, admissible strategies that also survive iterated elimination of dominated strategies (Dekel and Fudenberg (1990)). We strengthen standard belief to validated belief and we show that event-rationality and common validated belief of event-rationality (RCvBER) implies that players play iterated admissible strategies (IA). We show that in complete, continuous and compact type structures, RCBER and RCvBER are nonempty, and hence we obtain epistemic criteria for SinfW and IA.

    Unawareness of theorems

    Get PDF
    This paper provides a set-theoretic model of knowledge and unawareness. A new property called Awareness Leads to Knowledge shows that unawareness of theorems not only constrains an agent's knowledge, but also, can impair his reasoning about what other agents know. For example, in contrast to Li (2006), Heifetz et al. (2006a) and the standard model of knowledge, it is possible that two agents disagree on whether another agent knows a particular event. The model follows Aumann (1976) in defining common knowledge and characterizing it in terms of a self-evident event, but departs in showing that no-trade theorems do not hold.
    corecore