Using concepts of shoot growth and architecture to understand and predict responses of peach trees to pruning

International audienceOne definition of horticulture is "the art of cultivating garden plants" and pruning is a horticultural practice that is traditionally approached as more of an art than a science. This is largely because of the complexity of tree growth and development and a lack of general understanding and appreciation about the processes involved in governing shoot and tree growth and development. However recent tree architectural studies have provided systematic analyses of the shoot growth and statistical and dynamic simulation models have been developed that predict tree development and responses to pruning based on scientific concepts. These concepts include apical dominance (and its subcomponents; correlative inhibition, apical control and shoot epinasty); prolepsis and syllepsis; preformation and neoformation; epicormic shoot formation and plastochron (leaf emergence rates). In this paper we will discuss how many of these concepts can be combined with hidden semi-Markov chain models of shoot bud fates and a simulation model of source-sink interactions in peach trees (L-PEACH) to understand and predict natural development of peach trees and their responses to pruning. The results of these modeling efforts help explain the architectural and physiological basis of several common, empirically-based pruning systems used in California. These concepts also provide an understanding of the limitations of relying primarily on the use of pruning to control size of trees growing on commonly used invigorating rootstocks. This research demonstrates how computer simulation modeling can be used to test and analyze interactions between environmental factors and management practices in determining patterns of tree growth and development

Using concepts of shoot growth and architecture to understand and predict responses of peach trees to pruning

International audienceOne definition of horticulture is "the art of cultivating garden plants" and pruning is a horticultural practice that is traditionally approached as more of an art than a science. This is largely because of the complexity of tree growth and development and a lack of general understanding and appreciation about the processes involved in governing shoot and tree growth and development. However recent tree architectural studies have provided systematic analyses of the shoot growth and statistical and dynamic simulation models have been developed that predict tree development and responses to pruning based on scientific concepts. These concepts include apical dominance (and its subcomponents; correlative inhibition, apical control and shoot epinasty); prolepsis and syllepsis; preformation and neoformation; epicormic shoot formation and plastochron (leaf emergence rates). In this paper we will discuss how many of these concepts can be combined with hidden semi-Markov chain models of shoot bud fates and a simulation model of source-sink interactions in peach trees (L-PEACH) to understand and predict natural development of peach trees and their responses to pruning. The results of these modeling efforts help explain the architectural and physiological basis of several common, empirically-based pruning systems used in California. These concepts also provide an understanding of the limitations of relying primarily on the use of pruning to control size of trees growing on commonly used invigorating rootstocks. This research demonstrates how computer simulation modeling can be used to test and analyze interactions between environmental factors and management practices in determining patterns of tree growth and development

TX - Taller de Tesis - AR304 - 202301

Descripción: En este curso se desarrollará, mediante una propuesta arquitectónica, un proyecto escogido por el estudiante, en el que pueda acreditar que está en capacidad de hacer frente a los principales aspectos comprendidos en el desarrollo de un proyecto arquitectónico. En la primera etapa se establecen los criterios básicos de diseño de un pre-anteproyecto arquitectónico sustentado a partir de las condiciones: conceptuales, programáticas y de usuario, aspectos medio ambientales, urbano y paisajistas. En la segunda etapa se desarrolla un anteproyecto arquitectónico incluyendo además los criterios de las especialidades de estructuras, instalaciones eléctricas y sanitarias, y sistemas de evacuación. Propósito: El curso tiene como propósito la aprobación del anteproyecto con el cual el estudiante puede iniciar su Proyecto de Titulación Profesional. Busca contribuir al desarrollo de las competencias generales UPC: Comunicación Escrita, Comunicación Oral, Pensamiento Crítico, Razonamiento Cuantitativo, Manejo de la Información, Ciudadanía, Pensamiento Innovador y de las competencias específicas de la carrera: Diseño Fundamentado (que corresponde a los 3criterios NAAB PC2, SC5 como curso de validación), Cultura Arquitectónica, Técnica y Construcción (que corresponde a los criterios NAAB1 SC1 como curso de validación) y Gestión Profesional, todas en el nivel 3. Tiene como requisitos AR248 Gestión Inmobiliaria y HU61 inglés 5 y AR271 Lineamientos para el Proyecto Profesional y AR272 Seminario de Urbanismo y AR250 TIX - Taller de Ejercicio Profesional y aprobación por el director de la Carrera

TX - Taller de Tesis - AR304 - 202302

Descripción: En este curso se desarrollará, mediante una propuesta arquitectónica, un proyecto escogido por el estudiante, en el que pueda acreditar que está en capacidad de hacer frente a los principales aspectos comprendidos en el desarrollo de un proyecto arquitectónico. En la primera etapa se establecen los criterios básicos de diseño de un pre-anteproyecto arquitectónico sustentado a partir de las condiciones: conceptuales, programáticas y de usuario, aspectos medio ambientales, urbano y paisajistas. En la segunda etapa se desarrolla un anteproyecto arquitectónico incluyendo además los 3criterios de las especialidades de estructuras, instalaciones eléctricas y sanitarias, y sistemas de evacuación. Propósito: El curso tiene como propósito la aprobación del anteproyecto con el cual el estudiante puede iniciar su Proyecto de Titulación Profesional. Busca contribuir al desarrollo de las competencias generales UPC: Comunicación Escrita, Comunicación Oral, Pensamiento Crítico, Razonamiento Cuantitativo, Manejo de la Información, Ciudadanía, Pensamiento Innovador y de las competencias específicas de la carrera: Diseño Fundamentado (que corresponde a los criterios NAAB PC2, SC5 como curso de validación), Cultura Arquitectónica, Técnica y Construcción (que corresponde a los criterios NAAB1 SC1 como curso de validación) y Gestión Profesional, todas en el nivel 3. Tiene como requisitos AR248 Gestión Inmobiliaria y HU61 inglés 5 y AR271 Lineamientos para el Proyecto Profesional y AR272 Seminario de Urbanismo y AR250 TIX - Taller de Ejercicio Profesional y aprobación por el director de la Carrera

Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry

Abstract Background and purpose Prospectively collected data comparing the safety and effectiveness of individual non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs) are lacking. Our objective was to directly compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods In GLORIA-AF, a large, prospective, global registry program, consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AF were followed for 3 years. The comparative analyses for (1) dabigatran vs rivaroxaban or apixaban and (2) rivaroxaban vs apixaban were performed on propensity score (PS)-matched patient sets. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. Results The GLORIA-AF Phase III registry enrolled 21,300 patients between January 2014 and December 2016. Of these, 3839 were prescribed dabigatran, 4015 rivaroxaban and 4505 apixaban, with median ages of 71.0, 71.0, and 73.0 years, respectively. In the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dabigatran vs rivaroxaban were, for stroke: 1.27 (0.79–2.03), major bleeding 0.59 (0.40–0.88), myocardial infarction 0.68 (0.40–1.16), and all-cause death 0.86 (0.67–1.10). For the comparison of dabigatran vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 1.16 (0.76–1.78), myocardial infarction 0.84 (0.48–1.46), major bleeding 0.98 (0.63–1.52) and all-cause death 1.01 (0.79–1.29). For the comparison of rivaroxaban vs apixaban, in the PS-matched set, the adjusted HRs were, for stroke 0.78 (0.52–1.19), myocardial infarction 0.96 (0.63–1.45), major bleeding 1.54 (1.14–2.08), and all-cause death 0.97 (0.80–1.19). Conclusions Patients treated with dabigatran had a 41% lower risk of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban, but similar risks of stroke, MI, and death. Relative to apixaban, patients treated with dabigatran had similar risks of stroke, major bleeding, MI, and death. Rivaroxaban relative to apixaban had increased risk for major bleeding, but similar risks for stroke, MI, and death. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007. Date of registration: September 2013. Graphical abstract </jats:sec

Correction to: Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry

In this article, the name of the GLORIA-AF investigator Anastasios Kollias was given incorrectly as Athanasios Kollias in the Acknowledgements. The original article has been corrected.</jats:p

Correction to: Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: GLORIA-AF Registry

International audienceIn this article, the name of the GLORIA-AF investigator Anastasios Kollias was given incorrectly as Athanasios Kollias in the Acknowledgements. The original article has been corrected