Association Between Local Health Departments’ Engagement in PHAB Accreditation and Budget Cuts Prevention

Objectives: The primary purpose of this study is to examine whether engagement in Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) accreditation process and its requirements are associated with budget cuts prevention for local health departments (LHDs). Methods: For this study, we performed multinomial logistic regression using the 2016 National Profile of Local Health Departments Survey conducted by the National Association of County and City Health Officials. Results: While budget did not change for a majority of LHDs in comparison with previous year (48.6%), there were 28.7% that reported budget increase, and almost a quarter of LHDs had reduced budget (23%). The multinomial logistic regression showed no significant association between LHDs’ level of engagement in accreditation by PHAB or having completed three requirements (sometimes referred to as pre-requisites) and their budget increase than the previous year or even maintaining their budget the same as last year. However, government type, service delivery reduction, and proportion of revenue from local sources were significantly associated with budget increase or preserving it at the same level as previous year. Conclusion/implications: Given that the improved public health outcomes rely heavily on LHDs capacity to deliver quality essential public health services, which in turn depend on adequate and consistent funding, it may be essential for LHDs to find ways to overcome financial difficulties, maintain their existing funds, and try to find new revenue sources. Funding agencies and policymakers should support LHDs with adequate funding and find strategies to help LHDs to be well-prepared for any future financial threats. LHDs may also want to diversify their funding through strategies to increase funding from local sources

Association Between Local Health Departments’ Engagement in PAHB Accreditation and Their Financial Resiliency

Objectives: The primary purpose of this study is to examine whether engagement in Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) accreditation process and its prerequisites are associated with financial resiliency of local health departments (LHDs). Methods: For this study, we performed multinomial logistic regression using the 2016 National Profile of Local Health Departments Survey conducted by the National Association of County and City Health Officials. Results: While budget did not change for a majority of LHDs in comparison with previous year (48.6%), there were 28.7% that reported budget increase, and almost a quarter of LHDs had reduced budget (23%). The multinomial logistic regression showed no significant association between LHDs that are accredited by PHAB or completed any of its prerequisites and their budget increase than previous year or even maintaining their budget the same as last year. However, government type, service delivery reduction, and proportion of revenue from local sources were significantly associated with budget increase. Conclusion/Implications: Improved public health outcomes rely heavily on LHDs capacity to deliver quality essential public health services aligned with community health needs, which requires providing LHDs with adequate and consistent funding. LHDs have to find ways to overcome financial difficulties, maintain their existing funds, and try to find new revenue sources. Funding agencies and policymakers should support LHDs with the adequate funding and find strategies to help LHDs to be well-prepared for any future financial threats. LHDs may also want to diversify their funding through strategies to increase funding from local sources

Abstract 2550: Participant's satisfaction with the cancer community awareness access research and education (C-CARE) project at urban and rural sites

Abstract Introduction: The cancer-Community Awareness Access Research &amp; Education (c-CARE) project includes a series of cancer-related educational sessions that focus on educating the enrolled participants about cancers that are either preventable or have the potential for early detection to positively impact cancer outcomes. One of the important indicators of success is the level of satisfaction with the program expressed by the study participants who were navigated to needed medical or non-medical community resources through the program. Methods: The study (n=548, 98 rural (17.9%),450 urban (82.1%), provided education, cancer screening, and addressed perceived barriers and self-efficacy to accessing early cancer detection resources, while providing a list of community-based resources. Inclusion criteria included adults with 21-80 years of age primarily living in small urban and rural GA or SC counties. The study occurred in 9 urban AA churches, 3 rural AA churches, 3 community clinics and one Community Center. The responses to each question in the satisfaction survey were summarized using descriptive analysis (frequency, percent, and p-value). Results: A majority of respondents reported satisfaction with the program (86.5%) and that they would recommend the program to others (99.8%). Approximately, one-third (31.1%) stated that they used one or more of the c-CARE community resources provided. Of those who used c-CARE resources, 74.3% participated in Lung Cancer Screening, 58.3% used the Tobacco Cessation Clinic, and 44.3% used Community Resources. Almost all of the respondents stated that they were satisfied with the c-CARE resources (82.3%). Significantly, more rural participants reported accessing Lung Cancer Screening (100%, p &amp;lt; 0.03), the Tobacco Cessation Clinic (100%, p &amp;lt; 0.04), and community resources (100%, p &amp;lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences between the rural and urban cohorts in program satisfaction, if they would recommend the program to others, used one or more of the c-CARE resources provided, or were satisfied with the resources provided. Conclusion: These results demonstrate increased need in both rural and urban communities for access to cancer screening and resources. Participant satisfaction is an important outcome measure for vulnerable population needs and experiences within their community. The c-CARE project was able to successfully provide education, cancer screening, and navigation to community cancer prevention and support resources to both urban and rural populations with demonstrated satisfaction and success. Citation Format: Ghadeer Albashir, Samantha Sojourner, Marlo Vernon, Justin Moore, Stephen Looney, Martha Tingen. Participant's satisfaction with the cancer community awareness access research and education (C-CARE) project at urban and rural sites [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2550.</jats:p

Abstract 2553: Using a “train-the-trainer” approach with urban and rural minority community health workers to implement the cancer-Community Awareness Access Research and Education (c-CARE) Project

Abstract Introduction: Community health workers (CHW) are often a key component to effective implementation of health promotion interventions; training on intervention delivery and self-efficacy enhances CHW effectiveness. The cancer-Community Awareness Access Research and Education (c-CARE) project utilized a train-the-trainer approach to equip CHWs to teach the four-week c-CARE lung cancer module. Project objectives included providing and facilitating: 1) education on risks of lung cancer, 2) low-dose CT (LCDT) screening for eligible participants, 3) smoking cessation, and 4) training CHWs to deliver the educational intervention and thus promote sustainability. Methods: Lay CHWs (n=63, 54 urban, 9 rural, 92% female, 56% having ≥Bachelors degree, 79% healthcare providers) were selected from 16 historically African American (AA) churches (n = 9 urban, 3 rural), Federally-Qualified Health centers (n=3) and one community center, all in Georgia or South Carolina. CHW inclusion criteria included pastor recommendation from the churches' healthcare ministry (primarily nurses and other allied health professionals) or community clinic workers who were public health practitioners, nurses, and paraprofessionals. CHWs participated in a 2-day implementation training. Training topics included: their role as a c-CARE facilitator, knowledge of cancer risk factors and lung cancer screening, and using the c-CARE materials to teach the sessions. Pre and post surveys assessed knowledge, satisfaction with the training, and self-efficacy regarding teaching the content. Responses were summarized; all significance tests were two-tailed using a significance level of 0.05. Result: Improvement in each of the six items was strongly significant (p &amp;lt; 0.001), with a mean improvement of at least 2 points on the 0-10 scale in: 1) understanding of their roles as c-CARE facilitators, 2) knowledge of cancer risk factors, 3) knowledge of lung cancer screening, 4) confidence in conducting a c-CARE group, 5) confidence in their abilities to implement a policy change, and 6) confidence in using c-CARE materials to teach participants. Participants also reported satisfaction with the c-CARE training they received. There were no significant differences between urban and rural CHW participants. CHWs conducted 64 sessions for 586 participants as a part of the c-CARE project. Discussion: Use of lay CHWs to deliver culturally competent cancer education and screening navigation was an important component of the c-CARE project. Increases in knowledge regarding cancer risk factors, screening requirements, and self-efficacy in leading the sessions were reported by the CHWs. Use of local lay CHWs ensures sustainability, positively affecting community knowledge, attitude and beliefs regarding lung cancer, prevention, and screening behaviors. Citation Format: Marlo M. Vernon, Ghadeer Albashir, Samantha J. Sojourner, Justin X. Moore, Stephen W. Looney, Martha S. Tingen. Using a “train-the-trainer” approach with urban and rural minority community health workers to implement the cancer-Community Awareness Access Research and Education (c-CARE) Project [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2553.</jats:p

Abstract 2608: Lung cancer prevention and an early detection educational intervention in minority and underserved communities

Abstract Purpose: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in African Americans (AAs). The 5-year relative survival rate for localized lung cancer among AAs is 52%; however, only 16% of lung cancer cases are detected at this early stage. Even when lung cancer is diagnosed early, AAs are less likely than whites to receive life-saving surgery. Procedures: An educational intervention was delivered in 16 sites across the CSRA: 12 AA churches, three Federally-Qualified Health Centers, and one Community Center serving low-income and minority families. Community Health Workers at each site were selected and trained to deliver the educational content in four (4) 90-minute weekly sessions to participants in their congregation/facility. Content included cancer risk factors, the health consequences of tobacco use, tobacco cessation for current smokers, and the benefits of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer. Pre- and post-intervention “site surveys” were administered to individuals who were members/visitors of the intervention sites (i.e. members of the church, patients at the FQHC, and visitors of the Community Center) to assess community changes in knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding lung cancer following the intervention. This report is on the surveys completed anonymously by the people at the sites, not on those enrolled in the study. Results: Data were collected from 2136 participants (n=1404 baseline and 732 follow-up). Baseline and follow-up surveys were independent observations. Approximately 70.1% of respondents were female, 29.9% male, and 91.9% AA. There was significant improvement in the self-reported frequency of exercise among respondents, with 41.5% reporting 2-3 days of exercise at follow-up compared to 34.2% at baseline (p=0.006). Other significant findings include: current smoking status decreased from 13.5% at baseline to 8.0% at follow-up (p=0.001); knowledge of the recommended screening test for lung cancer increased from 35.2% at baseline to 43.4% at follow-up (p=0.002); men who have had a Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) blood test within the last year increased from 54.4% at baseline to 72.2% at follow-up (p=0.006); and women answering whether they had ever had a mammogram increased from 78.0% at baseline to 86.6% at follow-up (p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion: AAs are at greater risk for lung cancer incidence and mortality due to low access to quality healthcare, education, and prevention efforts. This project demonstrates that education and prevention efforts can be used to increase community knowledge about lung cancer and cancer risk factors, provide resources to decrease risk factors (smoking cessation) and increase access to screening for early detection. These efforts are promising for reducing cancer incidence and increasing early detection, and decreasing mortality rates among AAs who suffer disproportionate cancer health disparities. Citation Format: Samantha J. Sojourner, Marlo M. Vernon, Ghadeer Albashir, Justin X. Moore, Stephen W. Looney, Martha S. Tingen. Lung cancer prevention and an early detection educational intervention in minority and underserved communities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2608.</jats:p

Abstract 5908: Understanding geographic and racial disparities in mortality from four major cancers in the state of Georgia: A spatial epidemiologic analysis, 1999 - 2019

Abstract Purpose of the study: Progress in cancer outcomes in the general population are not equitable among all populations, leaving some, such as rural and non-Hispanic Blacks (NH-Black) behind. We examined geographic and racial variation in cancer mortality in the state of Georgia, and investigated the correlation between the observed spatial differences and county-level characteristics. Methods: We analyzed data on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer mortality among adults (aged &amp;gt;18 years) in 159 Georgia counties from years 1999 through 2019. Geospatial methods were applied, and we identified hot spot counties based on cancer mortality rates overall and stratified by non-Hispanic White (NH-White) and NH-Black races. We assessed differences in county-level characteristics between hot spot and non-hot spot counties using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Spearman correlation and stratified all analyses by race/ethnicity. Results: Among all adults, 5.0% (8 of 159), 8.2% (13 of 159), 5.0% (8 of 159), and 6.9% (11 of 159) of Georgia counties were estimated hot spots for breast cancer, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer mortality, respectively. Among NH-Whites, 5.7% (9 of 159), 4.4% (7 of 159), 4.4% (7 of 159) counties, and 5.0% (8 of 159) of counties were identified as hot spots for breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer mortality, respectively. Among NH-Blacks, 5.7% (9 of 159), 3.8% (6 of 159), 7.4% (11 of 159), and 5.7% (9 of 159) counties were identified as hot spots for breast, colorectal, lung, prostate cancer mortality, respectively. Cancer mortality hot spots were heavily concentrated in three major areas: 1) eastern Piedmont to Coastal Plain regions, 2) southwestern rural Georgia area, or 3) northern-most rural Georgia. Overall, hot spot counties generally had higher proportion of NH-Blacks, older adult population, greater poverty, and more rurality. Conclusions: We observed distinct geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in mortality from breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer in Georgia. Targeted cancer prevention strategies and allocation of health resources are needed in counties with elevated cancer mortality rates, focusing on interventions suitable for NH-Black, low-income, and rural residents. Citation Format: Justin Xavier Moore, Martha S. Tingen, Steven S. Coughlin, Christine O'Meara, Lorriane Odhiambo, Marlo Vernon, Samantha Jones, Robert Petcu, Ryan Johnson, K.M. Monirul Islam, Darryl Nettles, Ghadeer Albashir, Jorge Cortes. Understanding geographic and racial disparities in mortality from four major cancers in the state of Georgia: A spatial epidemiologic analysis, 1999 - 2019 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5908.</jats:p

Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research

Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit