68 research outputs found

    Reactive Capacity Study of Methane Adsorbed in Aluminic-Platinum Catalyst

    Get PDF
    AbstractThe paper deals with the influence of the methane/platinum on the adsorption properties of aluminic-platinum catalyst. Methane dehydrogenation degree on the Pt/Al2O3 surface has been calculated for the entire range of the studied CH4/Pt ratios. A high reactivity of the adsorbed methane forms in a C-C bond formation has been found at the joint conversion with n-pentane and with to aromatic hydrocarbons formation

    Fast Approximation of Search Trees on Trees with Centroid Trees

    Get PDF

    Fast approximation of search trees on trees with centroid trees

    Full text link
    Search trees on trees (STTs) generalize the fundamental binary search tree (BST) data structure: in STTs the underlying search space is an arbitrary tree, whereas in BSTs it is a path. An optimal BST of size nn can be computed for a given distribution of queries in O(n2)O(n^2) time [Knuth 1971] and centroid BSTs provide a nearly-optimal alternative, computable in O(n)O(n) time [Mehlhorn 1977]. By contrast, optimal STTs are not known to be computable in polynomial time, and the fastest constant-approximation algorithm runs in O(n3)O(n^3) time [Berendsohn, Kozma 2022]. Centroid trees can be defined for STTs analogously to BSTs, and they have been used in a wide range of algorithmic applications. In the unweighted case (i.e., for a uniform distribution of queries), a centroid tree can be computed in O(n)O(n) time [Brodal et al. 2001; Della Giustina et al. 2019]. These algorithms, however, do not readily extend to the weighted case. Moreover, no approximation guarantees were previously known for centroid trees in either the unweighted or weighted cases. In this paper we revisit centroid trees in a general, weighted setting, and we settle both the algorithmic complexity of constructing them, and the quality of their approximation. For constructing a weighted centroid tree, we give an output-sensitive O(nlogh)O(nlogn)O(n\log h)\subseteq O(n\log n) time algorithm, where hh is the height of the resulting centroid tree. If the weights are of polynomial complexity, the running time is O(nloglogn)O(n\log\log n). We show these bounds to be optimal, in a general decision tree model of computation. For approximation, we prove that the cost of a centroid tree is at most twice the optimum, and this guarantee is best possible, both in the weighted and unweighted cases. We also give tight, fine-grained bounds on the approximation-ratio for bounded-degree trees and on the approximation-ratio of more general α\alpha-centroid trees

    Die Ablauforganisation im Verein

    Full text link

    Zusammenfassung

    Full text link

    Ziele im Verein

    Full text link

    Organisatorische Grundlagen

    Full text link

    Vereinsstandards

    Full text link
    corecore