Effect of Mass Supplementation with Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food during an anticipated nutritional emergency

Previous studies have shown the benefits of ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) distribution in reducing the incidence and prevalence of severe acute malnutrition

Severe acute malnutrition and mortality in children in the community : Comparison of indicators in a multi-country pooled analysis

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Acknowledgments We would like to acknowledge the principal investigators of the original studies: Jan Van den Broeck for the DRC cohort, Michel Garenne for the Senegal cohort, and Keith West for the Nepal cohort. The DRC study was supported by the Centre de Développement Intégrale–Bwamanda, and funding was provided by the Flemish Inter-University Council (Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad), the Belgian Administration for Development Cooperation, and the Nutricia Research Foundation. Catherine Schwinger is affiliated to the Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), which is funded by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (project number 223269), the University of Bergen (UiB), Norway.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Methods of nutrition surveillance in low-income countries

Background In 1974 a joint FAO/UNICEF/WHO Expert Committee met to develop methods for nutrition surveillance. There has been much interest and activity in this topic since then, however there is a lack of guidance for practitioners and confusion exists around the terminology of nutrition surveillance. In this paper we propose a classification of data collection activities, consider the technical issues for each category, and examine the potential applications and challenges related to information and communication technology. Analysis There are three major approaches used to collect primary data for nutrition surveillance: repeated cross-sectional surveys; community-based sentinel monitoring; and the collection of data in schools. There are three major sources of secondary data for surveillance: from feeding centres, health facilities, and community-based data collection, including mass screening for malnutrition in children. Surveillance systems involving repeated surveys are suitable for monitoring and comparing national trends and for planning and policy development. To plan at a local level, surveys at district level or in programme implementation areas are ideal, but given the usually high cost of primary data collection, data obtained from health systems are more appropriate provided they are interpreted with caution and with contextual information. For early warning, data from health systems and sentinel site assessments may be valuable, if consistent in their methods of collection and any systematic bias is deemed to be steady. For evaluation purposes, surveillance systems can only give plausible evidence of whether a programme is effective. However the implementation of programmes can be monitored as long as data are collected on process indicators such as access to, and use of, services. Surveillance systems also have an important role to provide information that can be used for advocacy and for promoting accountability for actions or lack of actions, including service delivery. Conclusion This paper identifies issues that affect the collection of nutrition surveillance data, and proposes definitions of terms to differentiate between diverse sources of data of variable accuracy and validity. Increased interest in nutrition globally has resulted in high level commitments to reduce and prevent undernutrition. This review helps to address the need for accurate and regular data to convert these commitments into practice

Learning lessons from field surveys in humanitarian contexts: a case study of field surveys conducted in North Kivu, DRC 2006-2008

Survey estimates of mortality and malnutrition are commonly used to guide humanitarian decision-making. Currently, different methods of conducting field surveys are the subject of debate among epidemiologists. Beyond the technical arguments, decision makers may find it difficult to conceptualize what the estimates actually mean. For instance, what makes this particular situation an emergency? And how should the operational response be adapted accordingly. This brings into question not only the quality of the survey methodology, but also the difficulties epidemiologists face in interpreting results and selecting the most important information to guide operations. As a case study, we reviewed mortality and nutritional surveys conducted in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) published from January 2006 to January 2009. We performed a PubMed/Medline search for published articles and scanned publicly available humanitarian databases and clearinghouses for grey literature. To evaluate the surveys, we developed minimum reporting criteria based on available guidelines and selected peer-review articles. We identified 38 reports through our search strategy; three surveys met our inclusion criteria. The surveys varied in methodological quality. Reporting against minimum criteria was generally good, but presentation of ethical procedures, raw data and survey limitations were missed in all surveys. All surveys also failed to consider contextual factors important for data interpretation. From this review, we conclude that mechanisms to ensure sound survey design and conduct must be implemented by operational organisations to improve data quality and reporting. Training in data interpretation would also be useful. Novel survey methods should be trialled and prospective data gathering (surveillance) employed wherever feasible

Violence against civilians and access to health care in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: three cross-sectional surveys

ABSTRACT

Implementation of a remote symptom monitoring pathway in oncology care: analysis of real-world experience across 33 cancer centres in France and Belgium

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) of symptoms using electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) has been shown to reduce symptom burden and hospitalizations, increase dose intensity and improve quality of life of patients during systemic therapy being recommended by international guidelines in routine oncology practice. However, implementation in routine care has been slow and faces several challenges. In this study we report on the real-world multi-center implementation of a RPM pathway encompassing weekly patient symptom ePRO reporting with electronic alert notifications triggered to providers for severe or worsening symptoms. Methods: An RPM pathway was implemented in 33 European cancer centers in France and Belgium between November 2021 and August 2023. The implementation process followed a standardized phasic process of Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment. Patient-level and system-level implementation metrics were collected and evaluated according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Findings: Across the 33 cancer centers, the RPM pathway was implemented for 3015 patients cared for by 168 providers. The RPM pathway enabled effective and timely symptom management with 94.6% of all alerts (10,132/10,711) evolving to an improvement two weeks later, among which 88.4% (9468/10,711) showed ≥2 grades of improvement on the 5-point scale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology (PRO-CTCAE). The median time to alert management by the care team was 13 h 41 min (25th percentile: 1 h 42 min, 75th percentile: 1 day + 19 h 54 min), with 80% (36,269/45,334) of alerts managed by a nurse navigator telephone call. Patient adherence with weekly ePRO reporting was 82% (2472/3015). In an experience survey, 87% (32/38) of providers were satisfied with integrating the solution into their organization and 90% (276/307) of the patients felt that ePRO reporting positively impacted their care. As of March 2024, the pathway has been maintained in all participating centers, with activation of an additional 18 centers following data lock, and reimbursement for this RPM pathway approved in France in October 2023. Interpretation: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing and maintaining an RPM pathway during routine care across a diverse group of cancer centers in the European setting, with high levels of patient and provider engagement, and positive clinical impact. Funding: Part of this work was funded Breast Cancer Research Foundation (Career Development Award to Maria Alice Franzoi) and Resilience (nurse navigation and technology support).info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Integrating nutrition into health systems: What the evidence advocates

There is considerable evidence of positive health and nutrition outcomes resulting from integrating nutrition-specific interventions into health systems; however, current knowledge on establishing and sustaining effective integration of nutrition into health systems is limited. The objective of this review is to map the existing types of integration platforms and review the evidence on integrated health and nutrition programmes\u27 impacts on specific nutrition outcomes. A literature search was conducted, and integrated nutrition programmes were examined through the lens of the six World Health Organization (WHO) building blocks, including the demand side. Forty-five studies were included in this review, outlining the integration of nutrition-specific interventions with various programmes, including integrated community case management and Integrated Management of Childhood Illness, Child Health Days, immunization, early child development, and cash transfers. Limited quantitative data were suggestive of some positive impact on nutrition and non-nutrition outcomes with no adverse effects on primary programme delivery. Through the lens of the six WHO building blocks, service delivery and health workforce were found to be well-integrated, but governance, information systems, finance and supplies and technology were less well-integrated. Integrating nutrition-specific interventions into health systems may ensure efficient service delivery while having an impact on nutrition outcomes. There is no single successful model of integration; it varies according to the context and demands of the particular setting in which integration occurs. There is a need for more well-planned programmes considering all the health systems building blocks to ensure compliance and sustainability

Molecular apocrine tumours in EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III study: pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and clinical outcomes

Background: We explored, within the EORTC10994 study, the outcomes for patients with molecular apocrine (MA) breast cancer, and defined immunohistochemistry (IHC) as androgen-receptor (AR) positive, oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) negative. We also assessed the concordance between IHC and gene expression arrays (GEA) in the identification of MA cancers. Methods: Centrally assessed biopsies for AR, ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 by IHC were classified into six subtypes: MA, triple-negative (TN) basal-like, luminal A, luminal B HER2 negative, luminal B HER2 positive and “other”. The two main objectives were the pCR rates and survival outcomes in the overall MA subtype (and further divided by HER2 status) and the remaining five subtypes. Results: IHC subtyping was obtained in 846 eligible patients. Ninety-three (11%) tumours were classified as the MA subtype. Both IHC and GEA data were available for 64 patients. In this subset, IHC concordance was 88.3% in identifying MA tumours compared with GEA. Within the MA subtype, pCR was observed in 33.3% of the patients (95% CI: 29.4–43.9) and the 5-year recurrence-free interval was 59.2% (95% CI: 48.2–68.6). Patients with MA and TN basal-like tumours have lower survival outcomes. Conclusions: Irrespective of their HER2 status, the prognosis for MA tumours remains poor and adjuvant trials evaluating anti-androgens should be considered.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe