24 research outputs found

    Eosinophil Depletion with Benralizumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Benralizumab is an eosinophil-depleting anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody. The efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis are unclear. METHODS: In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients 12 to 65 years of age with symptomatic and histologically active eosinophilic esophagitis in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous benralizumab (30 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks. The two primary efficacy end points were histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) and the change from baseline in the score on the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ; range, 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating more frequent or severe dysphagia) at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients underwent randomization: 104 were assigned to receive benralizumab, and 107 were assigned to receive placebo. At week 24, more patients had a histologic response with benralizumab than with placebo (87.4% vs. 6.5%; difference, 80.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72.9 to 88.8; P CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving patients 12 to 65 years of age with eosinophilic esophagitis, a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) occurred in significantly more patients in the benralizumab group than in the placebo group. However, treatment with benralizumab did not result in fewer or less severe dysphagia symptoms than placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; MESSINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04543409.)

    Eosinophil Depletion with Benralizumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

    No full text
    BACKGROUND Benralizumab is an eosinophil-depleting anti–interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody. The efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis are unclear. METHODS In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients 12 to 65 years of age with symptomatic and histologically active eosinophilic esophagitis in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous benralizumab (30 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks. The two primary efficacy end points were histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) and the change from baseline in the score on the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ; range, 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating more frequent or severe dysphagia) at week 24. RESULTS A total of 211 patients underwent randomization: 104 were assigned to receive benralizumab, and 107 were assigned to receive placebo. At week 24, more patients had a histologic response with benralizumab than with placebo (87.4% vs. 6.5%; difference, 80.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72.9 to 88.8; P<0.001). However, the change from baseline in the DSQ score did not differ significantly between the two groups (difference in least-squares means, 3.0 points; 95% CI, –1.4 to 7.4; P=0.18). There was no substantial between-group difference in the change from baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score, which reflects endoscopic abnormalities. Adverse events were reported in 64.1% of the patients in the benralizumab group and in 61.7% of those in the placebo group. No patients discontinued the trial because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients 12 to 65 years of age with eosinophilic esophagitis, a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) occurred in significantly more patients in the benralizumab group than in the placebo group. However, treatment with benralizumab did not result in fewer or less severe dysphagia symptoms than placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; MESSINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04543409.

    Activation of naturally occurring lung CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells requires CD8 and MHC I interaction

    No full text
    Naturally occurring Foxp3+CD4+CD25+ T cells (nTregs) isolated from lungs of naive mice regulate allergic airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and inflammation. Here, we demonstrate the critical requirement for engagement of MHC class I on CD4+CD25+ T cells by CD8 for the functional activation of these nTregs. Suppression of allergen-induced AHR and inflammation by nTregs was abolished in mice treated with anti-CD8. Correspondingly, decreased levels of IL-10 and TGF-β and increased levels of Th2 cytokines in bronchoalveolar lavage were detected in these treated mice. Similarly, nTregs isolated from β2m−/− mice or from mice treated with anti-MHC I antibody in vitro before intratracheal transfer failed to modulate AHR or inflammation. Coculture of nTregs with CD8+ T cells increased IL-10 and TGF-β. Addition of anti-MHC I or anti-CD8 reduced IL-10 and TGF-β. These results demonstrate that functional activation of nTregs requires the interaction between MHC I on CD4+CD25+ T cells and CD8

    Interleukin-10-Secreting regulatory T cells in allergy and asthma

    No full text
    Allergic diseases, including asthma, are chronic inflammatory disorders originating from an aberrant immune response to innocuous antigens in our environment (allergens). In susceptible individuals, sensitization to allergen leads to the induction of allergen-specific T-helper type 2 (Th2) responses and immunoglobulin E (IgE) production. Subsequent challenge with allergen results in IgE-mediated mast cell activation and the recruitment and activation of effector cells, leading to clinical symptoms of disease. In this review, we discuss evidence that the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) offers therapeutic promise for the control of asthma and allergy. We highlight the potential role of IL-10 secretion by a specialized T-cell subset, T regulatory cells, to prevent allergic inflammation in healthy individuals and to provide long-term relief from disease symptoms in allergic patient
    corecore