Interventions targeting bottle and formula feeding in the prevention and treatment of early childhood caries, overweight and obesity : an integrative review

Overweight, obesity and early childhood caries (ECC) are preventable conditions affecting infants and young children, with increased prevalence in those formula-fed. Previous research has focused on distinct outcomes for oral health and healthy weight gain. However, the aetiology may be linked through overlapping obesogenic and cariogenic feeding behaviours, such as increased sugar exposure through bottle propping and overfeeding. Best-practice bottle feeding and transition to cup use may concurrently reduce overweight, obesity and ECC. This integrative review aimed to identify interventions supporting best-practice formula feeding or bottle cessation and examine the intervention effects on feeding, oral health and weight outcomes. The reviewers searched nine databases and found 27 studies that met the predetermined inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies focused on populations vulnerable to ECC or unhealthy weight gain. All studies focused on carer education; however, only 10 studies utilised behaviour change techniques or theories addressing antecedents to obesogenic or cariogenic behaviours. The outcomes varied: 16 studies reported mixed outcomes, and eight reported worsened post-intervention outcomes. While some studies reported improvements, these were not maintained long-term. Many study designs were at risk of bias. Effective intervention strategies for preventing ECC and child obesity require the holistic use of interdisciplinary approaches, consumer co-design and the use of behavioural change theory

Carer perspectives on overweight, obesity and dental caries in early childhood: findings from a systematic qualitative review

IntroductionFormula and bottle feeding behaviours can increase obesity and tooth decay (early childhood caries, ECC) in early childhood, through non-responsive feeding and prolonged exposure to sugar. Parents’ beliefs can be barriers to behaviour change for obesity and ECC prevention. Understanding these beliefs towards children's teeth and weight can address parents’ priorities and develop prevention messages. This qualitative systematic review (PROSPERO registration #CRD42022348783) aimed to identify parent or carer perspectives on obesity and ECC in children aged ≤6 years.MethodsDatabase searching of CINAHL, Medline and EMBASE, with hand searching, was undertaken. Included papers were qualitative research publications, focused on parent or carer beliefs and attitudes towards overweight, obesity or ECC in infants and children. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken to generate themes, with a strengths-based approach focused on parents’ lived experience. Quality appraisal was undertaken with the CASP Qualitative Checklist. Descriptive characteristics of the study and participants, and qualitative findings, were extracted qualitatively in NVivo.Results7,365 references were identified from database and hand searching, with 98 references included for analysis. Three research themes were generated: (1) parenting to support child wellness, including healthy teeth and weight; (2) parents’ response to unwellness, including identifying symptoms, causes and protective factors for unhealthy weight and teeth; (3) information and resources needed to support healthy weight and teeth. There was high or potential risk of bias in qualitative methodology when studies did not address researcher-participant relationships or rigorous data analysis processes.DiscussionFindings highlight the need for strength-based messages for children's teeth and weight, increased understanding of formula and bottle feeding as obesity and ECC risk factors, and holistic approaches to care by dental and primary care professionals.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022348783, PROSPERO CRD42022348783

Interventions for the uptake of evidence-based recommendations in acute stroke settings

Background There is a growing body of research evidence to guide acute stroke care. Receiving care in a stroke unit improves access to recommended evidence-based therapies and patient outcomes. However, even in stroke units, evidence-based recommendations are inconsistently delivered by healthcare workers to patients with stroke. Implementation interventions are strategies designed to improve the delivery of evidence-based care. Objectives To assess the effects of implementation interventions (compared to no intervention or another implementation intervention) on adherence to evidence-based recommendations by health professionals working in acute stroke units. Secondary objectives were to assess factors that may modify the effect of these interventions, and to determine if single or multifaceted strategies are more effective in increasing adherence with evidence-based recommendations. Search methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute and ProQuest databases to 13 April 2022. We searched the grey literature and trial registries and reviewed reference lists of all included studies, relevant systematic reviews and primary studies; contacted corresponding authors of relevant studies and conducted forward citation searching of the included studies. There were no restrictions on language and publication date. Selection criteria We included randomised trials and cluster-randomised trials.Participants were health professionals providing care to patients in acute stroke units; implementation interventions (i.e. strategies to improve delivery of evidence-based care) were compared to no intervention or another implementation intervention. We included studies only if they reported on our primary outcome which was quality of care, as measured by adherence to evidence-based recommendations,in order to address the review aim. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. We compared single implementation interventions to no intervention, multifaceted implementation interventions to no intervention, multifaceted implementation interventions compared to single implementation interventions and multifaceted implementation interventions to another multifaceted intervention. Our primary outcome was adherence to evidence-based recommendations. Main results We included seven cluster-randomised trials with 42,489 patient participants from 129 hospitals, conducted in Australia, the UK,China, and the Netherlands. Health professional participants (numbers not specified) included nursing, medical and allied health professionals. Interventions in all studies included implementation strategies targeting healthcare workers; three studies included delivery arrangements, no studies used financial arrangements or governance arrangements. Five trials compared a multifaceted implementation intervention to no intervention, two trials compared one multifaceted implementation intervention to another multifaceted implementation intervention. No included studies compared a single implementation intervention to no intervention or to a multifaceted implementation intervention. Quality of care outcomes (proportions of patients receiving evidence-based care) were included in all included studies. All studies had low risks of selection bias and reporting bias, but high risk of performance bias. Three studies had high risks of bias from non-blinding of outcome assessors or due to analyses used.We are uncertain whether a multifaceted implementation intervention leads to any change in adherence to evidence-based recommendations compared with no intervention (risk ratio (RR) 1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 3.61; 4 trials; 76 clusters; 2144participants, I2 =92%, very low-certainty evidence). Looking at two specific processes of care, multifaceted implementation interventions compared to no intervention probably lead to little or no difference in the proportion of patients with ischaemic stroke who received thrombolysis (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.37, 2 trials; 32 clusters; 1228 participants, moderate-certainty evidence), but probably do increase the proportion of patients who receive a swallow screen within 24 hours of admission (RR 6.76, 95% CI 4.44 to 10.76; 1 trial; 19 clusters;1,804 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Multifaceted implementation interventions probably make little or no difference in reducing the risk of death, disability or dependency compared to no intervention (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.02; 3 trials; 51 clusters ;1228 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably make little or no difference to hospital length of stay compared with no intervention (difference in absolute change 1.5 days; 95% CI -0.5 to 3.5; 1 trial; 19 clusters; 1804 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We do not know if a multifaceted implementation intervention compared to no intervention result in changes to resource use or health professionals' knowledge because no included studies collected these outcomes. Authors' conclusions We are uncertain whether a multifaceted implementation intervention compared to no intervention improves adherence to evidence-based recommendations in acute stroke settings, because the certainty of evidence is very low

Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review

Excessive weight gain in infancy is an established risk for childhood obesity. Primary healthcare professionals have regular contact with infants and are well placed to monitor their growth. This review explores primary healthcare professionals’ practice in monitoring growth for infants from birth to 2 years, addressing assessment methods, practitioner confidence and interventions for unhealthy weight gain. Reviewers searched four databases for studies of primary healthcare professionals working in high-income countries that reported on practice monitoring infant growth. Thirty-six eligible studies documented health professionals’ practice with infants. While most clinicians regularly weighed and measured infants, some did not record measurements comprehensively. Growth monitoring occurred regularly during well-child visits but was less common during unscheduled visits. Some participants were less proficient at interpreting growth trajectories or lacked confidence in detecting excessive weight gain and in communicating concerns to parents. Few interventions addressed unhealthy growth among infants. Primary healthcare professionals require support to monitor growth trajectories effectively, to communicate appropriately with parents and to engage them in developing healthy behaviours early. Strategies are also required to monitor infants not regularly attending primary health care. </jats:p

Supplemental Material - Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review

Supplemental Material for Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review by Chris Rossiter, Heilok Cheng and Elizabeth Denney-Wilson in Journal of Child Health Care</p

Supplemental Material - Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review

Supplemental Material for Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review by Chris Rossiter, Heilok Cheng and Elizabeth Denney-Wilson in Journal of Child Health Care</p

The relationship between patient obesity and nursing workload: An integrative review

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Aims and objectives: To explore the relationship between patient obesity and nursing workload, and discuss the nursing activities most affected by patient obesity. Background: The increasing number of patients with obesity, and the severity of obesity, impacts the healthcare workforce, particularly to nurses who provide most direct care to patients. There is growing evidence to suggest that patient obesity may increase nursing workload and time taken for clinical care. Design: Integrative review. Methods: A comprehensive search of academic databases for primary research related to patient obesity and nursing workload, published since 2000, was conducted. References of relevant articles were hand-searched. Results: 27 articles were analysed. Analysis was undertaken at the levels of patient characteristics, nursing work and the healthcare system. The increasing number of patients with obesity, and the severity of patient obesity, increases nursing workload by affecting nursing time needed to deliver care. An increased number of nurses, particularly with increased clinical skill, are needed to deliver care meeting these increased needs. Organisational change is required to provide infrastructure and bariatric equipment that enables effective nursing care of patients with obesity. Organisations must consider additional time and staff needs when delivering care for patients with obesity. Conclusions: The current health system is not established to address the challenge of providing nursing care to the increasing numbers of patients with obesity. Further research on accurately and objectively quantifying the impact and severity of patient obesity on nursing clinical activities is required. Relevance to clinical practice: When determining staffing, healthcare organisations must consider the increased nursing staff, time and clinical skill required to provide care for patients with obesity. Healthcare organisations should implement policies that ensure sufficient staffing in areas where care of patients with obesity is prevalent, and provide training for and workplace availability of bariatric equipment

Supplemental Material - Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review

Supplemental Material for Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review by Chris Rossiter, Heilok Cheng and Elizabeth Denney-Wilson in Journal of Child Health Care</p

Supplemental Material - Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review

Supplemental Material for Primary healthcare professionals’ role in monitoring infant growth: A scoping review by Chris Rossiter, Heilok Cheng and Elizabeth Denney-Wilson in Journal of Child Health Care</p