Optimal Cache Allocation for Content-Centric Networking

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China with Grant 2012CB315801, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) with Grants 61133015 and 61272473, the National High-tech R&D Program of China with Grant 2013AA013501, and by the Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS with Grant X-DA06010303. The work was also supported by the EC EINS and EPSRC IU-ATC projects

Wheel + Ring = Reel: the Impact of Route Filtering on the Stability of Policy Routing

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) allows providers to express complex routing policies preserving high degrees of autonomy. However, unrestricted routing policies can adversely impact routing stability. A key concept to understand the interplay between autonomy and expressiveness on one side, and stability on the other side, is safety under filtering, i.e., guaranteed stability under autonomous usage of route filters. BGP route filters are used to selectively advertise specific routes to specific neighbors. In this paper, we provide a characterization of safety under filtering, filling the large gap between previously known necessary and sufficient conditions. Our characterization is based on the absence of a particular kind of dispute wheel, a structure involving circular dependencies among routing preferences. We exploit our result to show that networks admitting multiple stable states are provably unsafe under filtering, and the troublesome portion of the configuration can be pinpointed starting from the stable states alone. This is especially interesting from an operational point of view since networks with multiple stable states actually happen in practice (BGP wedgies). Finally, we show that adding filters to an existing configuration may lead to oscillations even if the configuration is safe under any link failure. Unexpectedly, we find policy configurations where misconfigured filters can do more harm than network faults

Wheel + Ring = Reel: the impact of route filtering on the stability of policy routing

BGP allows providers to express complex routing policies preserving high degrees of autonomy. However, unrestricted routing policies can adversely impact routing stability. A key concept to understand the interplay between autonomy and expressiveness on one side, and stability on the other side, is safety under filtering, i.e., guaranteed stability under autonomous usage of route filters. BGP route filters are used to selectively advertise specific routes to specific neighbors. We provide a necessary and sufficient condition for safety under filtering, filling the large gap between previously known necessary and sufficient conditions. Our characterization is based on the absence of a particular kind of dispute wheel, a structure involving circular dependencies among routing preferences. We exploit our result to show that networks admitting multiple stable states are provably unsafe under filtering. This is especially interesting from an operational point of view, since networks with multiple stable states actually happen in practice (BGP wedgies). Finally, we show that adding filters to an existing configuration may lead to oscillations even if the configuration is safe under any link failure. Unexpectedly, we find policy configurations where misconfigured filters can do more harm than network faults

Using routers to build logic circuits : How powerful is BGP ?

Because of its practical relevance, the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) has been the target of a huge research effort since more than a decade. In particular, many contributions aimed at characterizing the computational complexity of BGP-related problems. In this paper, we answer computational complexity questions by unveiling a fundamental mapping between BGP configurations and logic circuits. Namely, we describe simple networks containing routers with elementary BGP configurations that simulate logic gates, clocks, and flip-flops, and we show how to interconnect them to simulate arbitrary logic circuits. We then investigate the implications of such a mapping on the feasibility of solving BGP fundamental problems, and prove that, under realistic assumptions, BGP has the same computing power as a Turing Machine. We also investigate the impact of restrictions on the expressiveness of BGP policies and route propagation (e.g., route propagation rules in iBGP and Local Transit Policies in eBGP) and the impact of different message timing models. Finally, we show that the mapping is not limited to BGP and can be applied to generic routing protocols that use several metric

Graceful router updates in link-state protocols

Manageability and evolvability are crucial needs for IP networks. Unfortunately, planned topological changes may lead to transient forwarding loops in link-state routing protocols commonly used in IP networks. These lead to service unavailability, reducing the frequency at which operators can adapt the network topology. Prior works proved that the state of a given link can be modified while avoiding forwarding inconsistencies without changing protocol specifications. In this paper, we study the more general problem of gracefully modifying the state of an entire router, while minimizing the induced operational impact. As opposed to a single-link modification, the router update problem is kdimensional for a node of degree k. Moreover, we show that the interplay between operations applied at the router granularity can lead to loops that do not occur considering a single-link modification. In this paper, we present an efficient algorithm that computes minimal sequences of weights to be configured on the links of the updated node. Based on real IP network topologies, we show that the size of such sequence is limited in practice

The Case for Pluginized Routing Protocols

Routing protocols such as BGP and OSPF are key components of Internet Service Provider (ISP) networks. These protocols and the operator’s requirements evolve over time, but it often takes many years for network operators to convince their different router vendors and the IETF to extend routing protocols. Some network operators, notably in enterprise and datacenters have adopted Software Defined Networking (SDN) with its centralised control to be more agile. We propose a new approach to implement routing protocols that enables network operators to innovate while still using distributed routing protocols and thus keeping all their benefits compared to centralised routing approaches. We extend a routing protocol with a virtual machine that is capable of executing plugins. These plugins extend the protocol or modify its underlying algorithms through a simple API to meet the specific requirements of operators. We modify the OSPF and BGP implementations provided by FRRouting and demonstrate the applicability of our approach with several use cases