Perspective for the 20th Anniversary of the Faculty of Human Development, Kobe University

textabstractBackground. Few data are available on the course of and predictors for disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP). Objective. The purpose of this study was to describe the course of disability and identify clinically important prognostic factors of low-back-pain-specific disability in patients with CNSLBP receiving multidisciplinary therapy. Design. A prospective cohort study was conducted. Methods. A total of 1,760 patients with CNSLBP who received multidisciplinary therapy were evaluated for their course of disability and prognostic factors at baseline and at 2-, 5-, and 12-month follow-ups. Recovery was defined as 30% reduction in low back pain-specific disability at follow-up compared with baseline and as absolute recovery if the score on the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) was ≤20 points at follow-up. Potential prognostic factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results. Mean patient-reported disability scores on the QBPDS ranged from 51.7 (SD 15.6) at baseline to 31.7 (SD 15.2), 31.1 (SD 18.2), and 29.1 (SD 20.0) at 2, 5, and 12 months, respectively. The prognostic factors identified for recovery at 5 and 12 months were younger age and high scores on disability and on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Physical and Mental Component Summaries) at baseline. In addition, at 5-month follow-up, a shorter duration of complaints was a positive predictor, and having no comorbidity and less pain at baseline were additional predictors at 12-month follow-up. Limitations. Missing values at 5and 12-month follow-ups were 11.1% and 45.2%, respectively. Conclusion. After multidisciplinary treatment, the course of disability in patients with CNSLBP continued to decline over a 12-month period. At 5-and 12-month follow-ups, prognostic factors were identified for a clinically relevant decrease in disability scores on the QBPDS

Course and prognosis of recovery for chronic non-specific low back pain: design, therapy program and baseline data of a prospective cohort study

Background: There has been increasing focus on factors predicting the development of chronic musculoskeletal disorders. For patients already experiencing chronic non-specific low back pain it is also relevant to investigate which prognostic factors predict recovery. We present the design of a cohort study that aims to determine the course and prognostic factors for recovery in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Methods/Design. All participating patients were recruited (Jan 2003-Dec 2008) from the same rehabilitation centre and were evaluated by means of (postal) questionnaires and physical examinations at baseline, during the 2-month therapy program, and at 5 and 12 months after start of therapy. The therapy protocol at the rehabilitation centre used a bio-psychosocial approach to stimulate patients to adopt adequate (movement) behaviour aimed at physical and functional recovery. The program is part of regular care and consists of 16 sessions of 3 hours each, over an 8-week period (in total 48 hours), followed by a 3-month self-management program. The primary outcomes are low back pain intensity, disability, quality of life, patient's global perceived effect of recovery, and participation in work. Baseline characteristics include information on socio-demographics, low back pain, employment status, and additional clinical items status such as fatigue, duration of activities, and fear of kinesiophobia. Prognostic variables are determined for recovery at short-term (5 months) and long-term (12 months) follow-up after start of therapy. Discussion. In a routine clinical setting it is important to provide patients suffering from chronic non-specific low back pain with adequate information about the prognosis of their complaint

Anterior and posterior rectus abdominis sheath stiffness in relation to diastasis recti: Abdominal wall training or not?

Introduction: This study explores the anatomical relation of the rectus abdominis muscles with the anterior and posterior rectus sheaths. The elastic behavior of these fascial sheets is also assessed. Both of these analyses form an anatomic-biomechanical basis for diagnosis and treatment, especially in relation to diastasis recti abdominis (DRA). Method: Fundamental observational, biomechanical study. Seven post-mortem, embalmed human specimens were dissected. The abdominal muscles and the fascial sheets of the abdominal wall were dissected. 4 × 4 cm samples of the anterior and posterior rectus sheaths were loaded in longitudinal and transverse direction, while recording elongation by means of a displacement sensor. The main outcome measures were anatomical descriptions and elongation of fascia samples in mm (mean and standard ± deviation). Results: In longitudinal direction the posterior rectus sheath samples stretched over 1.67 ± 0.48 mm, while in transverse direction the mean stretch was 0.29 ± 0.18 mm (p = 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference between longitudinal (0.78 ± 0.43 mm) and transversal displacement (0.50 ± 0.23 mm) was observed in the anterior rectus sheath (p = 0.56). Discussion and conclusion: The posterior rectus sheath is functionally more related to the transverse abdominis muscle than to the rectus abdominis muscle. From this connection, in combination with the specific stiffness of the posterior fascia in the lateral direction, it is assumed that the transverse abdominis muscles play an important role in the etiology but also in reduction of DRA. The transverse abdominis and rectus abdominis muscles collaborate in support of the abdominal wall