Management of Hypertension in High-Risk Ethnic Minority with Heart Failure

Hypertension (HTN) is the most common co-morbidity in the world, and its sequelae, heart failure (HF) is one of most common causes of mortality and morbidity in the world. Current understanding of pathophysiology and management of HTN in HF is mainly based on studies, which have mainly included whites. Among racial groups, African-American adults have the highest rates (44%) of hypertension in the world and are more resistant to treatment. There is an emerging consensus on the significance of racial disparities in the pathophysiology and treatment options of hypertension and heart failure. However, African Americans had been underrepresented in all the trials until the initiation of the A-HEFT trial. Since the recognition of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as an important medical condition, large clinical trials have shown benefits of OSA treatment among patients with HTN and HF. This paper focuses on the pathophysiology, causes of secondary hypertension, and treatment of hypertension among African-American patients with heart failure. There is increasing need for randomized clinical trials testing innovative treatment options for African-American patients

Natural Progression of Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Because the natural progression of low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) has not been well defined, we performed a retrospective study of 116 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone follow-up echocardiography at a median interval of 698 days (range, 371–1,020 d). All patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (\u3e0.50) during and after follow-up. At baseline, patients were classified by aortic valve area (AVA) as having mild stenosis (≥1.5 cm2), moderate stenosis (≥1 to \u3c1.5 cm2), or severe stenosis (\u3c1 cm2). Severe aortic stenosis was further classified by mean gradient (LGAS, mean \u3c40 mmHg; high-gradient aortic stenosis [HGAS], mean ≥40 mmHg). We compared baseline and follow-up values among 4 groups: patients with mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, LGAS, and HGAS. At baseline, 30 patients had mild stenosis, 54 had moderate stenosis, 24 had LGAS, and 8 had HGAS. Compared with the moderate group, the LGAS group had lower AVA but similar mean gradient. Yet the actuarial curves for progressing to HGAS were significantly different: 25% of patients in LGAS reached HGAS status significantly earlier than did 25% of patients in the moderate-AS group (713 vs 881 d; P=0.035). Because LGAS has a high propensity to progress to HGAS, we propose that low-gradient aortic stenosis patients be closely monitored as a distinct subgroup that warrants more frequent echocardiographic follow-up

Calcific aortic valve stenosis:hard disease in the heart: A biomolecular approach towards diagnosis and treatment

Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is common in the ageing population and set to become an increasing economic and health burden. Once present, it inevitably progresses and has a poor prognosis in symptomatic patients. No medical therapies are proven to be effective in holding or reducing disease progression. Therefore, aortic valve replacement remains the only available treatment option. Improved knowledge of the mechanisms underlying disease progression has provided us with insights that CAVS is not a passive disease. Rather, CAVS is regulated by numerous mechanisms with a key role for calcification. Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is actively regulated involving cellular and humoral factors that may offer targets for diagnosis and intervention. The discovery that the vitamin K-dependent proteins are involved in the inhibition of AVC has boosted our mechanistic understanding of this process and has opened up novel avenues in disease exploration. This review discusses processes involved in CAVS progression, with an emphasis on recent insights into calcification, methods for imaging calcification activity, and potential therapeutic options

Aortic stenosis: An update

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in the world. It is a disease of the elderly and as our population is getting older in both the developed and the developing world, there has been an increase in the prevalence of AS. It is impacting the mortality and morbidity of our elderly population. It is also causing a huge burden on the healthcare system. There has been tremendous progress in our understanding of AS in recent years. Lately, studies have shown that AS is not just a disease of the aortic valve but it affects the entire systemic vasculature. There are studies looking at more sophisticated measures of disease severity that might better predict the optimal timing of valve replacement. The improvement in our understanding in etiology and pathophysiology of the disease process has led to a number of trials with possible treatment options for AS. In this review, we talk about our understanding of the disease and latest developments in disease assessment and management. We look forward to a time when there will be medical treatment for AS

The association of heart valve diseases with coronary artery dominance

Background and aim of the study: Aortic stenosis (AS) is thought to be caused by calcific degeneration of the aortic valve. Clinical observations suggest an association between a left dominant coronary circulation and AS, a situation previously investigated at necropsy and with small observational studies. Mitral regurgitation (MR) and aortic regurgitation (AR) are both disorders with multiple etiologies, but neither has any known association with coronary artery dominance. Methods: The coronary angiogram database of a tertiary referral centre was reviewed for consecutive left heart catheter data acquired over a six-year period. The severity of AS was classified by measured pressure gradient (in mmHg) as none (0), mild (&lt;30), moderate (30-49), or severe (&gt;49). Both, MR and AR were assessed visually by the operator. Results: A total of 1,891 patients was included. In the AS group there was a significant association with a left dominant coronary circulation (p &lt;0.0001), and the proportion of patients with left dominance increased with the severity of AS (p &lt;0.005). There was no significant association of AR with coronary artery dominance (p = 0.84). MR was associated with a reduced prevalence of left dominance (p &lt;0.005). Conclusion: AS was associated with a left dominant coronary circulation, and the incidence of left dominance was increased with the severity of AS, but the opposite situation was true for MR. The reasons for these observations remain unclear.</p