5 research outputs found

    La terapia insulinica sottocutanea continua (CSII) in Italia. Terza indagine nazionale

    Get PDF
    La diffusione della terapia insulinica sottocutanea continua con microinfusore (CSII) \ue8 in continuo aumento nel mondo, grazie anche al miglioramento della tecnologia degli strumenti. Scopo di questo lavoro \ue8 stato quello di valutare lo stato attuale della CSII in Italia. A tal fine ai responsabili di 272 strutture diabetologiche che seguono pazienti in terapia con microinfusore \ue8 stato inviato un questionario che indagava aspetti clinici, tecnici e organizzativi della terapia con microinfusore. Duecentodiciassette strutture (79,8%) hanno partecipato all\u2019indagine. Dai dati raccolti \ue8 emerso che a fine aprile 2013 in tali strutture vi erano 10.152 pazienti in terapia con microinfusore, quasi tutti (98,2%) affetti da diabete di tipo 1, prevalentemente adulti (82,4%) e di sesso femminile (57%). La diffusione della CSII risultava molto disomogenea tra le diverse Regioni e anche tra le diverse strutture diabetologiche di una stessa Regione: solo il 59% delle strutture seguiva pi\uf9 di 20 pazienti ciascuna. Motivo principale per iniziare la CSII era la ricerca del buon controllo glicemico. Il drop-out (8,65% dei casi), avveniva soprattutto per problemi legati alla portabilit\ue0 della pompa o al mancato raggiungimento del target glicemico. La maggior parte dei pazienti (61%) utilizzava un microinfusore tradizionale, il 39% un microinfusore integrato (32%) o associato (7%) a un dispositivo per il monitoraggio in continuo della glicemia. Le funzioni avanzate del microinfusore venivano mediamente utilizzate solo dal 68% dei pazienti e il sensore era utilizzato mediamente solo per 12 giorni al mese. L\u201981% delle strutture garantiva una reperibilit\ue0 24 ore su 24. Solo nel 40% delle strutture per adulti e nel 50% di quelle pediatriche i pazienti venivano seguiti da un team completo. In conclusione, la CSII si sta sempre pi\uf9 diffondendo in Italia, sia tra i pazienti adulti sia tra quelli pediatrici. \uc8 auspicabile una maggiore uniformit\ue0 tra le diverse Regioni e un uso pi\uf9 adeguato della tecnologia stessa

    Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in Italy: third national survey.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is increasing worldwide, mostly because of improved technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of CSII in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicians from 272 diabetes centers received a questionnaire investigating clinical features, pump technology, and management of patients on CSII. RESULTS: Two hundred seventeen centers (79.8%) joined the study and, by the end of April 2013, gave information about 10,152 patients treated with CSII: 98.2% with type 1 diabetes mellitus, 81.4% adults, 57% female, and 61% with a conventional pump versus 39% with a sensor-augmented pump. CSII advanced functions were used by 68% of patients, and glucose sensors were used 12 days per month on average. Fifty-eight percent of diabetes centers had more than 20 patients on CSII, but there were differences among centers and among regions. The main indication for CSII was poor glucose control. Dropout was mainly due to pump wearability or nonoptimal glycemic control. Twenty-four hour assistance was guaranteed in 81% of centers. A full diabetes team (physician+nurse+dietician+psychologist) was available in 23% of adult-care diabetes centers and in 53% of pediatric diabetes units. CONCLUSIONS: CSII keeps increasing in Italy. More work is needed to ensure uniform treatment strategies throughout the country and to improve pump use

    Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in Italy: Third National Survey

    No full text
    Background: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is increasing worldwide, mostly because of improved technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of CSII in Italy. Materials and Methods: Physicians from 272 diabetes centers received a questionnaire investigating clinical features, pump technology, and management of patients on CSII. Results: Two hundred seventeen centers (79.8%) joined the study and, by the end of April 2013, gave information about 10,152 patients treated with CSII: 98.2% with type 1 diabetes mellitus, 81.4% adults, 57% female, and 61% with a conventional pump versus 39% with a sensor-augmented pump. CSII advanced functions were used by 68% of patients, and glucose sensors were used 12 days per month on average. Fifty-eight percent of diabetes centers had more than 20 patients on CSII, but there were differences among centers and among regions. The main indication for CSII was poor glucose control. Dropout was mainly due to pump wearability or nonoptimal glycemic control. Twenty-four hour assistance was guaranteed in 81% of centers. A full diabetes team (physician+nurse+dietician+psychologist) was available in 23% of adult-care diabetes centers and in 53% of pediatric diabetes units. Conclusions: CSII keeps increasing in Italy. More work is needed to ensure uniform treatment strategies throughout the country and to improve pump use
    corecore