Social inequalities, residential greenness and common mental disorders in women: evidence from the Born in Bradford family cohort study

Background: Green space may promote mental health in vulnerable groups but evidence is mixed. We explored prevalence of Common Mental Disorders (CMD) and associations with green space in a deprived urban multi-ethnic population. Methods: We included 4737 women from the Born in Bradford cohort (64% South Asian origin, 49% most deprived population decile). Green space was measured using the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) around home addresses and availabiltiy of major green spaces within 300 m. CMD were identified from health records (diagnosis and prescriptions) and self-reported anxiety and depression symptoms. Area deprivation, ethnicity, education, physical activity, use, and satisfaction with green spaces were collected. Linear and logistic regression models explored the distribution of CMD and residential greenness for different socio-economic groups and associations between greenness metrics and CMD. Mediators (physical activity) and moderators (green space use and satisfaction) were explored. Findings: Thirty percent of participants showed at least one CMD indicator. White British and the least and most educated groups had higher CMD rates. South Asian and Black ethnic groups had less surrounding greenness and greater availability of major green spaces; however used them less frequently. No relationships between green space and CMD were apparent. For those unsatisfied with their local park, living within 300 m of a major green space increased risk of anxiety symptoms, but not other CMD indicators. Interpretation: Availability of quality green spaces alone may not be enough to confer health benefits for populations experiencing high rates of CMD and multiple environmental and social stressors

Increasing Incidence of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the Southwest of Madrid, Spain.

Objectives: The incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis is unknown in our area. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis and its possible association with the most frequent absolute annual pollen counts. Methods: A descriptive retrospective multicenter observational study was designed to calculate the incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis in children aged under 15 years in the southwest region of Madrid, Spain in 2002-2013 (data were provided by the Statistics Institute of Madrid). We collected data on age, sex, clinical presentation, and date of endoscopic diagnosis. Relative risk (RR) was estimated (Stata v.11) using negative binomial regression models to assess the association between incidence and pollen counts (provided by Subiza Clinic). Results: The study population comprised 254 patients (192 male [75.6%], aged 0.5-14.99 years). The clinical presentation was esophageal impaction in 23.6%, dysphagia in 22%, gastroesophageal reflux–like symptoms in 44.9%, and other findings in 9.4%. The annual incidence from 2002 to 2013 per 100 000 children aged <15 years per year was, respectively, 0.81, 1.5, 0.37, 3.17, 3.07, 4.36, 6.87, 7.19, 8.38, 9.05, 9.14, and 9.68. The incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis increased by an average of 19% annually (RR, 1.19; 95%CI, 1.14-1.25;P1 (1.17 and 1.06, respectively) (P<.05). Conclusion: The incidence of diagnosis of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis increased by an average of 19% annually. No significant association was found between incidence and pollen counts, except for a weak association with Platanus species.post-print359 K

Residential green and blue spaces and working memory in children aged 6–12 years old. Results from the inma cohort

6-8 and 10–12 years’ follow-ups in Asturias were funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS-PI13/02429 and PI18/00909) and cofounded by European Social Fund “Investing in your future”, CIBER-ESP, Obra Social Cajastur/Fundación Liberbank, and Universidad de Oviedo. The Asturias Regional Clinic Research Ethics Committee approved the research protocols (...) INMA Sabadell 6–8 years follow-up received funding through (...)EU Commission (261357). The 10–12 years follow-up was funded by grants (...) EU Commission (261357, 308333, 603794 and 634453). (...

Trained immunity induction by the inactivated mucosal vaccine MV130 protects against experimental viral respiratory infections.

MV130 is an inactivated polybacterial mucosal vaccine that confers protection to patients against recurrent respiratory infections, including those of viral etiology. However, its mechanism of action remains poorly understood. Here, we find that intranasal prophylaxis with MV130 modulates the lung immune landscape and provides long-term heterologous protection against viral respiratory infections in mice. Intranasal administration of MV130 provides protection against systemic candidiasis in wild-type and Rag1-deficient mice lacking functional lymphocytes, indicative of innate immune-mediated protection. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of trained immunity with metformin abrogates the protection conferred by MV130 against influenza A virus respiratory infection. MV130 induces reprogramming of both mouse bone marrow progenitor cells and in vitro human monocytes, promoting an enhanced cytokine production that relies on a metabolic shift. Our results unveil that the mucosal administration of a fully inactivated bacterial vaccine provides protection against viral infections by a mechanism associated with the induction of trained immunity.We are grateful to members of the D.S. laboratory for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank the CNIC facilities and personnel for assistance. P.B. is funded by grant BES-2014-069933 (‘‘Ayudas para Contratos Predoctorales para la Formacio´ n de Doctores 2014’’) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO). L.C. was a recipient of a European Respiratory Society Fellowship (RESPIRE2-2013- 3708). G.D. is supported by a European Molecular Biology Organization Long-term Fellowship (ALTF 379-2019). This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sk1odowska-Curie grant agreement No. 892965. Work in the D.S. laboratory is funded by the CNIC; by the European Research Council (ERC-2016-consolidator grant 725091); by the European Commission (635122-PROCROP H2020); by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacio´ n (MICINN), Agencia Estatal de Investigacio´ n (AEI), and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) (SAF2016-79040-R); by AEI (PID2019-108157RB); by Comunidad de Madrid (B2017/BMD-3733 Immunothercan-CM); by FIS-Instituto de Salud Carlos III, MICINN and FEDER (RD16/0015/0018-REEM); by a collaboration agreement with Inmunotek; by Atresmedia (Constantes y Vitales prize); by Fundacio´ La Marato´ de TV3 (201723); and by Fondo Solidario Juntos (Banco Santander). The CNIC is supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the MICINN, and the Pro CNIC Foundation.S

Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and childhood asthma: a European collaborative analysis

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour in early childhood with asthma and reduced lung function in later childhood within a large collaborative study. DESIGN: Pooling of longitudinal data from collaborating birth cohorts using meta-analysis of separate cohort-specific estimates and analysis of individual participant data of all cohorts combined. SETTING: Children aged 0-18 years from 26 European birth cohorts. PARTICIPANTS: 136 071 individual children from 26 cohorts, with information on PA and/or sedentary behaviour in early childhood and asthma assessment in later childhood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Questionnaire-based current asthma and lung function measured by spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/forced vital capacity) at age 6-18 years. RESULTS: Questionnaire-based and accelerometry-based PA and sedentary behaviour at age 3-5 years was not associated with asthma at age 6-18 years (PA in hours/day adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04; sedentary behaviour in hours/day adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.07). PA was not associated with lung function at any age. Analyses of sedentary behaviour and lung function showed inconsistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced PA and increased sedentary behaviour before 6 years of age were not associated with the presence of asthma later in childhood. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.The authors received no specific funding for this article. Funding information per cohort: ABCD: The ABCD study has been supported by grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW) and The Netherlands Heart Foundation. ABIS: Special thanks to the participating families in the ABIS study, and all staff at Obstetric departments and Well-Baby Clinics. ABIS has been supported by Swedish Research Council (K2005-72X-11242-11A and K2008-69X-20826-01-4) and the Swedish Child Diabetes Foundation (Barndiabetesfonden), JDRF Wallenberg Foundation (K 98-99D-12813-01A), Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS), and the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS2004-1775) and Östgöta Brandstodsbolag. BAMSE: This BAMSE birth cohort was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, Formas, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Swedish Asthma and Allergy Research Foundation, Region Stockholm (ALF project, and for cohort and database maintenance), and the European Research Council (TRIBAL, grant agreement 757919). CHOP: The CHOP study reported herein have been carried out with partial financial support from the Commission of the European Community, specific RTD Programme 'Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources', within the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), project EarlyNutrition under grant agreement no. 289346, partial financial support from Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (2571/7.PR/2012/2), the EU H2020 project PHC-2014-DynaHealth under grant no. 633595 and the European Research Council Advanced Grant META-GROWTH (ERC-2012-AdG-no.322605). COPSAC2000: All funding received by COPSAC is listed on www.copsac.com. The Lundbeck Foundation (Grant no R16-A1694); The Ministry of Health (Grant no 903516); Danish Council for Strategic Research (Grant no 0603-00280B) and The Capital Region Research Foundation have provided core support to the COPSAC research center. DNBC: The Danish National Birth Cohort was established with a significant grant from the Danish National Research Foundation. Additional support was obtained from the Danish Regional Committees, the Pharmacy Foundation, the Egmont Foundation, the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, the Health Foundation and other minor grants. The DNBC Biobank has been supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Lundbeck Foundation. EDEN: EU FP7 Framework MedAll project, National Institute for Research in Public Health (IRESP TGIR Cohorte Santé 2008 Program); National Agency for Research (ANR non-thematic programme); French Speaking Association for the Study of Diabetes and Metabolism (Alfediam); Mutuelle Générale de l’Éducation Nationale; Nestlé; French National Institute for Health Education (INPES); Paris‐Sud University; French National Istitute for Population Health Surveillance (InVS); French Agency for Environment Security (AFFSET); French Ministry of Health Perinatal Program; Inserm Nutrition Research Program; Institut Fédératif de Recherche and Cohort Program; French Ministry of Research; EURIP and FIRE doctoral school–Programme Bettencourt; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM). G21: Generation XXI was supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalisation and national funding from the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education under the project 'HIneC: When do health inequalities start? Understanding the impact of childhood social adversity on health trajectories from birth to early adolescence' (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029567; Reference PTDC/SAU-PUB/29567/2017). It is also supported by the Unidade de Investigação em Epidemiologia–Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto (EPIUnit) (UIDB/04750/2020), Administração Regional de Saúde Norte (Regional Department of Ministry of Health) and Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian; PhD Grant SFRH/BD/108742/2015 (to SS) co-funded by FCT and the Human Capital Operational Programme (POCH/FSE Program); ACS is founded by a FCT Investigator contracts IF/01060/2015. Generation R: The Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from the Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Erasmus University Rotterdam and The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development. The project received funding for projects from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (LIFECYCLE, grant agreement No 733206, 2016; EUCAN-Connect grant agreement No 824989; ATHLETE, grant agreement No 874583). LD received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 cofunded programme ERA-Net on Biomarkers for Nutrition and Health (ERA HDHL) (ALPHABET project (no 696295; 2017), ZonMW The Netherlands (no 529051014; 2017)). GINIplus: The GINIplus study was mainly supported for the first 3 years of the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology (interventional arm) and Helmholtz Zentrum Munich (former GSF) (observational arm). The 4 years, 6 years, 10 years and 15 years follow-up examinations of the GINIplus study were covered from the respective budgets of the five study centres (Helmholtz Zentrum Munich (former GSF), Research Institute at Marien-Hospital Wesel, LMU Munich, TU Munich and from 6 years onwards also from IUF - Leibniz Research-Institute for Environmental Medicine at the University of Düsseldorf) and a grant from the Federal Ministry for Environment (IUF Düsseldorf, FKZ 20462296). Further, the 15-year follow-up examination of the GINIplus study was supported by the Commission of the European Communities, the 7th Framework Program: MeDALL project, and as well by the companies Mead Johnson and Nestlé. The authors thank all the families for their participation in the GINIplus study. Furthermore, we thank all members of the GINIplus Study Group for their excellent work. The GINIplus Study group consists of the following: Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg (Heinrich J, Brüske I, Schulz H, Flexeder C, Zeller C, Standl M, Schnappinger M, Ferland M, Thiering E, Tiesler C); Department of Pediatrics, Marien-Hospital, Wesel (Berdel D, von Berg A); Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Dr von Hauner Children’s Hospital (Koletzko S); Child and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital rechts der Isar of the Technical University Munich (Bauer CP, Hoffmann U); IUF- Environmental Health Research Institute, Düsseldorf (Schikowski T, Link E, Klümper C, Krämer U, Sugiri D). HUMIS: HUMIS is supported by the Research Council of Norway (NevroNor, grant number 226402). INMA Asturias: This study was funded by grants from, FIS-FEDER: PI04/2018, PI09/02311, PI13/02429, PI18/00909; Obra Social Cajastur/Fundación Liberbank, and Universidad de Oviedo. We thank Fundación NOE Alimerka. INMA Gipuzkoa: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS-PI06/0867, FIS-PI09/00090, FIS-PI13/02187 include FEDER funds), CIBERESP, Department of Health of the Basque Government (2005111093, 2009111069, 2013111089 and 2015111065), and the Provincial Government of Gipuzkoa (DFG06/002, DFG08/001 and DFG15/221) and annual agreements with the municipalities of the study area (Zumarraga, Urretxu, Legazpi, Azkoitia y Azpeitia y Beasain). INMA Menorca: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176; CB06/02/0041; 97/0588; 00/0021-2; PI061756; PS0901958; PI14/00677 incl. FEDER funds), CIBERESP, Beca de la IV convocatoria de Ayudas a la Investigación en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas de La Caixa, and EC Contract No. QLK4-CT-2000-00263. INMA Sabadell: This study was funded by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Red INMA G03/176; CB06/02/0041; PI041436; PI081151 incl. FEDER funds; CPII/00018), CIBERESP, Generalitat de Catalunya-CIRIT 1999SGR 00241, Generalitat de Catalunya-AGAUR 2009 SGR 501, Fundació La marató de TV3 (090430), EU Commission (261357). ISGlobal is a member of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya. INMA Valencia: This study was funded by grants from UE (FP7-ENV-2011 cod 282957 and HEALTH.2010.2.4.5-1), Spain: ISCIII (Red INMA G03/176, CB06/02/0041; FIS-FEDER: PI03/1615, PI04/1509, PI04/1112, PI04/1931, PI05/1079, PI05/1052, PI06/1213, PI07/0314, PI09/02647, PI11/01007, PI11/02591, PI11/02038, PI13/1944, PI13/2032, PI14/00891, PI14/01687, PI16/1288, PI17/00663, and 19/1338; Miguel Servet-FEDER CP11/00178, CP15/00025 and CPII16/00051), Generalitat Valenciana: FISABIO (UGP 15-230, UGP-15-244, UGP-15-249, and AICO 2020/285), and Alicia Koplowitz Foundation 2017. KOALA: The KOALA cohort study was cofinanced by Friesland Foods (now FrieslandCampina), Netherlands Asthma Foundation (grant numbers 3.2.07.022 and 3.2.03.48) and Netherlands Heart Foundation (grant number 2014 T037), the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw Prevention Program number 1.210-00-090). The funding sources had no role in the study design and the collection, analysis and interpretation of data and the writing of the article and the decision to submit it for publication. Lifeways: The Lifeways study has been funded by the Health Research Board, Ireland, and the Irish Department of Health and Children’s Health Promotion Policy Unit. LISA: The LISA study was mainly supported by grants from the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology and in addition from Helmholtz Zentrum Munich (former GSF), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Leipzig, Research Institute at Marien-Hospital Wesel, Pediatric Practice, Bad Honnef for the first 2 years. The 4 years, 6 years, 10 years and 15 years follow-up examinations of the LISA study were covered from the respective budgets of the involved partners (Helmholtz Zentrum Munich (former GSF), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Leipzig, Research Institute at Marien-Hospital Wesel, Pediatric Practice, Bad Honnef, IUF—Leibniz-Research Institute for Environmental Medicine at the University of Düsseldorf) and in addition by a grant from the Federal Ministry for Environment (IUF Düsseldorf, FKZ 20462296). Further, the 15-year follow-up examination of the LISA study was supported by the Commission of the European Communities, the 7th Framework Program: MeDALL project. The authors thank all the families for their participation in the LISA study. Furthermore, we thank all members of the LISA Study Group for their excellent work. The LISA Study group consists of the following: Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Epidemiology, Munich (Heinrich J, Schnappinger M, Brüske I, Ferland M, Schulz H, Zeller C, Standl M, Thiering E, Tiesler C, Flexeder C); Department of Pediatrics, Municipal Hospital 'St. Georg', Leipzig (Borte M, Diez U, Dorn C, Braun E); Marien Hospital Wesel, Department of Pediatrics, Wesel (von Berg A, Berdel D, Stiers G, Maas B); Pediatric Practice, Bad Honnef (Schaaf B); Helmholtz Centre of Environmental Research—UFZ, Department of Environmental Immunology/Core Facility Studies, Leipzig (Lehmann I, Bauer M, Röder S, Schilde M, Nowak M, Herberth G, Müller J); Technical University Munich, Department of Pediatrics, Munich (Hoffmann U, Paschke M, Marra S); Clinical Research Group Molecular Dermatology, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich (Ollert M, J. Grosch). LRC: All phases of this study were supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants: SNF 320030_182628, 32003B_162820, PDFMP3 137033, 32003B_162820, 32003B_144068, PZ00P3_147987) and Asthma UK 07/048. LUCKI: This study was supported by Maastricht University and the Public Health Service South Limburg. PIAMA: The Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy Study has been funded by grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research; the Lung Foundation of the Netherlands; the Netherlands Ministry of Planning, Housing and the Environment; the Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; and the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. SEATON: Medical Research Council, Grant number: 80219, MR/K001035/1; Asthma UK, Grant numbers: 00/011, 02/017. STEPS Study: The Academy of Finland (grant no. 123571 and 121659); the Juho Vainio Foundation; the Foundation for Pediatric Research; the Finnish Medical Foundation. SWS: The SWS was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12011/4), Dunhill Medical Trust, British Heart Foundation, Food Standards Agency (contract no N05071), British Lung Foundation. National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust, the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), project EarlyNutrition (grant 289346) and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 733206 (LifeCycle). WHISTLER: The authors (from the WHISTLER birth cohort) received no specific funding for this article. The WHISTLER birth cohort was supported with a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (grant no. 2001-1-1322) and by an unrestricted grant from GlaxoSmithKline Netherlands

Residential greenness and children working memory. An EU Child Cohort Network consortium study.

Cognitive tasks such as language comprehension, learning, reasoning and problem-solving require the storage and management of information (Baddeley, 1992; Vuontela et al., 2003). One key executive function for these purposes is working memory (WM), which emerges from the interaction between memory and attention and allows an individual to store and manipulate information for short periods of time (Cowan, 2014; Shelton et al., 2010). Longitudinal studies on WM have shown that it improves during childhood before showing a period of latency in early adolescence (10–13 years; Ahmed et al., 2022; Reynolds et al., 2022). WM also shows a brief second period of improvement in middle adolescence (14–16 years).Environmental epidemiologists and researchers in related disciplines have been working intensively during the past decade to map and quantify the potential salutogenic effects of green spaces and greenness on a wide range of health outcomes (Dzhambov et al., 2020; Markevych et al., 2017). One of the potential pathways for positive impact is the reduction of exposure to air pollutants because: (i) pollutants may become deposited on vegetated surfaces (Lindén et al., 2023); (ii) green spaces create an increased distance to emission sources such as roads (Klingberg et al., 2017). In this context, the study of whether higher exposure to residential green spaces and greenness leads to higher working memory scores has received considerable attention. A recently published systematic review (Buczyłowska et al., 2023) compiled the results of seven observational studies linking green space and greenness metrics with WM outcomes in participants of various ages between 4 and 18 years. Four of these studies showed statistically significant protective effects. The remaining three studies did not find any supporting evidence. In a more recent study, not included in that systematic review, marginally significant associations (p &lt; 0.10) were found between both green space availability and residential Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and WM scores and in a sample of over 1600 children aged 6–11 years living in various European cities (Fernandes et al., 2023).In the present study, we wanted to contribute to the debate by analysing new data that could help clarify the associations, if any, between residential green spaces, greenness metricsand WM. In addition, we wished to explore the specific issue of reduced exposure to NO2, a pollutant that has been specifically linked to WM performance in childhood (Alemany et al., 2018; Forns et al., 2017; Sunyer et al., 2015)

Measurement of asthma control according to global initiative for asthma guidelines : a comparison with the asthma control questionnaire

Introduction: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a validated tool to measure asthma control. Cut-off points that best discriminate " well-controlled" or " not well-controlled" asthma have been suggested from the analysis of a large randomized clinical trial but they may not be adequate for daily clinical practice.Aims: To establish cut-off points of the ACQ that best discriminate the level of control according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2006 guidelines in patients with asthma managed at Allergology and Pulmonology Departments as well as Primary Care Centers in Spain.Patients and methods: An epidemiological descriptive study, with prospective data collection. Asthma control following GINA-2006 classification and 7-item ACQ was assessed. The study population was split in two parts: 2/3 for finding the cut-off points (development population) and 1/3 for validating the results (validation population).Results: A total of 1,363 stable asthmatic patients were included (mean age 38 ± 14 years, 60.3% women; 69.1% non-smokers). Patient classification according to GINA-defined asthma control was: controlled 13.6%, partially controlled 34.2%, and uncontrolled 52.3%. The ACQ cut-off points that better agreed with GINA-defined asthma control categories were calculated using receiver operating curves (ROC). The analysis showed that ACQ < 0.5 was the optimal cut-off point for " controlled asthma" (sensitivity 74.1%, specificity 77.5%) and 1.00 for " uncontrolled asthma" (sensitivity 73%, specificity 88.2%). Kappa index between GINA categories and ACQ was 0.62 (p < 0.001).Conclusion: The ACQ cut-off points associated with GINA-defined asthma control in a real-life setting were <0.5 for controlled asthma and ≥1 for uncontrolled asthma. © 2012 Olaguibel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd