Quantifying the impact of climate change on drought regimes using the Standardised Precipitation Index

The study presents a methodology to characterise short- or long-term drought events, designed to aid understanding of how climate change may affect future risk. An indicator of drought magnitude, combining parameters of duration, spatial extent and intensity, is presented based on the Standardised Precipitation Index (SPI). The SPI is applied to observed (1955–2003) and projected (2003–2050) precipitation data from the Community Integrated Assessment System (CIAS). Potential consequences of climate change on drought regimes in Australia, Brazil, China, Ethiopia, India, Spain, Portugal and the USA are quantified. Uncertainty is assessed by emulating a range of global circulation models to project climate change. Further uncertainty is addressed through the use of a high-emission scenario and a low stabilisation scenario representing a stringent mitigation policy. Climate change was shown to have a larger effect on the duration and magnitude of long-term droughts, and Australia, Brazil, Spain, Portugal and the USA were highlighted as being particularly vulnerable to multi-year drought events, with the potential for drought magnitude to exceed historical experience. The study highlights the characteristics of drought which may be more sensitive under climate change. For example, on average, short-term droughts in the USA do not become more intense but are projected to increase in duration. Importantly, the stringent mitigation scenario had limited effect on drought regimes in the first half of the twenty-first century, showing that adaptation to drought risk will be vital in these regions

Integrated methodological framework fos assesing the risk of failure in water supply incorporating drought forecast. Case study: Andean regulated river basin

[EN] Hydroclimatic drought conditions can affect the hydrological services offered by mountain river basins causing severe impacts on the population, becoming a challenge for water resource managers in Andean river basins. This study proposes an integrated methodological framework for assessing the risk of failure in water supply, incorporating probabilistic drought forecasts, which assists in making decisions regarding the satisfaction of consumptive, non-consumptive and environmental requirements under water scarcity conditions. Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the risk of failure in multiple stochastic scenarios, which incorporate probabilistic forecasts of drought events based on a Markov chains (MC) model using a recently developed drought index (DI). This methodology was tested in the Machángara river basin located in the south of Ecuador. Results were grouped in integrated satisfaction indexes of the system (DSIG). They demonstrated that the incorporation of probabilistic drought forecasts could better target the projections of simulation scenarios, with a view of obtaining realistic situations instead of optimistic projections that would lead to riskier decisions. Moreover, they contribute to more effective results in order to propose multiple alternatives for prevention and/or mitigation under drought conditions.This study was part of the doctoral thesis of Aviles A. at the Technical University of Valencia. This research was funded by the University of Cuenca through its Research Department (DIUC) and the Municipal public enterprise of telecommunications, drinking water, sewage and sanitation of Cuenca (ETAPA) through the projects: BIdentificacion de los procesos hidrometeorologicos que desencadenan inundaciones en la ciudad de Cuenca usando un radar de precipitacion" and "Ciclos meteorologicos y evapotranspiracion a lo largo de una gradiente altitudinal del Parque Nacional Cajas". The authors also thank INAMHI and the CBRM for providing the information for this study. The authors wish to thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for its financial support through the ERAS project (CTM2016-77804-P). We thank Angel Vazquez, who helped in the programming of the multiple simulations. Also we thank to the TropiSeca project.Avilés-Añazco, A.; Solera Solera, A.; Paredes Arquiola, J.; Pedro Monzonís, M. (2018). Integrated methodological framework fos assesing the risk of failure in water supply incorporating drought forecast. Case study: Andean regulated river basin. Water Resources Management. 32(4):1209-1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1863-7S12091223324Andreu J, Capilla J, Sanchís E (1996) AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. J Hydrol 177(3-4):269–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02963-XAndreu J, Solera A, Capilla J, Ferrer J (2007) Modelo SIMGES para simulación de cuencas. Manual de usuario v3. 00. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, ValenciaAndreu J, Ferrer J, Perez MA et al (2013) Drought planning and management in the Júcar River Basin, Spain. In: Schwabe K et al (eds) Drought in arid and semi-arid regions. Springer science, Dordrecht, pp 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6636-5_13Avilés A, Solera A (2013) Análisis de sistemas de recursos hídricos de la cuenca del rio Tomebamba en Ecuador, mediante modelos estocásticos y de gestión. In: Solera A, Paredes J, Andreu J (eds) Aplicaciones de sistemas soporte a la decisión en planificación y gestión integradas de cuencas hidrográficas. Marcombo, Barcelona, España pp 51–61Avilés A, Célleri R, Paredes J, Solera A (2015) Evaluation of Markov chain based drought forecasts in an Andean Regulated River basin using the skill scores RPS and GMSS. Water Resour Manag 29(6):1949–1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0921-2Avilés A, Célleri R, Solera A, Paredes J (2016) Probabilistic forecasting of drought events using Markov chain-and Bayesian network-based models: a case study of an Andean Regulated River Basin. Water 8:1–16Barua S, Ng A, Perera B (2012) Drought assessment and forecasting: a case study on the Yarra River catchment in Victoria, Australia. Aust J Water Resour 15(2):95–108. https://doi.org/10.7158/W10-848.2012.15.2Bazaraa MS, Jarvis JJ, Sherali HD (2011) Linear programming and network flows, fourth Edi. John Wiley & Sons, New JerseyBrown C, Baroang KM, Conrad E et al (2010) IRI technical report 10–15, managing climate risk in water supply systems. Palisades, NYCancelliere A, Di Mauro G, Bonaccorso B, Rossi G (2007) Drought forecasting using the standardized precipitation index. Water Resour Manag 21(5):801–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9062-yCancelliere A, Nicolosi V, Rossi G (2009) Assessment of drought risk in water supply systems in coping with drought risk in agriculture and water supply systems. Advances in natural and technological hazards research 26. In: Coping with drought risk in agriculture. Springer, pp 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9045-5_8Chen YD, Zhang Q, Xiao M, Singh VP, Zhang S (2016) Probabilistic forecasting of seasonal droughts in the Pearl River basin, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30(7):2031–2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1174-6Gong G, Wang L, Condon L, Shearman A, Lall U (2010) A simple framework for incorporating seasonal Streamflow forecasts into existing water resource management practices. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 46(3):574–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00435.xHaro D, Solera A, Paredes J, Andreu J (2014) Methodology for drought risk assessment in within-year regulated reservoir systems. Application to the Orbigo River system (Spain). Water Resour Manag 28(11):3801–3814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0710-3Haro-Monteagudo D, Solera A, Andreu J (2017) Drought early warning based on optimal risk forecasts in regulated river systems: application to the Jucar River basin (Spain). J Hydrol 544:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.022Hashimoto T, Loucks DP, Stedinger JR (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i001p00014Hwang Y, Carbone GJ (2009) Ensemble forecasts of drought indices using a conditional residual resampling technique. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48(7):1289–1301. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2071.1Kao S-C, Govindaraju RS (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380(1-2):121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.029Keyantash JA, Dracup JA (2004) An aggregate drought index: assessing drought severity based on fluctuations in the hydrologic cycle and surface water storage. Water Resour Res 40(9):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002610Khadr M (2016) Forecasting of meteorological drought using hidden Markov model (case study: the upper Blue Nile river basin, Ethiopia). Ain Shams Eng J 7(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.11.005Madadgar S, Moradkhani H (2013) A Bayesian framework for probabilistic seasonal drought forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 14(6):1685–1706. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-010.1Madadgar S, Moradkhani H (2014) Spatio-temporal drought forecasting within Bayesian networks. J Hydrol 512:134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.039Mahmoudzadeh H, Mahmoudzadeh H, Afshar M, Yousefi S (2016) Applying first-order Markov chains and SPI drought index to monitor and forecast drought in West Azerbaijan Province of Iran. Int J Geo Sci Environ Plan 1:44–53. 10.22034/ijgsep.2016.40669Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) Review paper a review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391(1-2):202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012Nalbantis I, Tsakiris G (2009) Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resour Manag 23(5):881–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9305-1Ochola WO, Kerkides P (2003) A Markov chain simulation model for predicting critical wet and dry spells in Kenya: Analysing rainfall events in the kano plains. Irrig Drain 52(4):327–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.094Paulo AA, Pereira LS (2007) Prediction of SPI drought class transitions using Markov chains. Water Resour Manag 21(10):1813–1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9129-9Phan TD, Smart JCR, Capon SJ, Hadwen WL, Sahin O (2016) Applications of Bayesian belief networks in water resource management: a systematic review. Environ Model Softw 85:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.006Pouget L, Roldán T, Gómez M et al (2015) Use of seasonal climate predictions in the water sector—preliminary results from the EUPORIAS project. In: Andreu J, Solera A, Paredes J et al (eds) Drought: research and science-policy interfacing. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, p 247Rossi G, Cancelliere A (2013) Managing drought risk in water supply systems in Europe: a review. Int J Water Resour Dev 29(2):272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2012.713848Rossi G, Caporali E, Garrote L (2012) Definition of risk indicators for reservoirs management optimization. Water Resour Manag 26(4):981–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9842-xSánchez S, Andreu J, Solera A (2001) Gestión de Recursos Hídricos con Decisiones Basadas en Estimación del Riesgo. Universidad Politécnica De Valencia, ValenciaSandoval-Solis S, McKinney DC, Loucks M (2011) Sustainability index for water resources planning and management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(5):381–390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000134Sankarasubramanian A, Lall U, Devineni N, Espinueva S (2009) The role of monthly updated climate forecasts in improving intraseasonal water allocation. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48(7):1464–1482. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2122.1Shukla S, Wood AW (2008) Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophys Res Lett 35(2):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032487Staudinger M, Stahl K, Seibert J (2014) A drought index accounting for snow. Water Resour Res 50(10):7861–7872. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015143Sveinsson O, Salas JD, Lane W, Frevert D (2007) Stochastic analysis, modeling, and simulation (SAMS) version 2007, user’s manual. Computing Hydrology Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, ColoradoSvoboda M, Hayes M, Wilhite D, Tadesse T (2004) Recent advances in drought monitoring. Drought Mitig Cent Fac Publ 6:6Vogel RM (2017) Stochastic watershed models for hydrologic risk management. Water Secur 1:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2017.06.001Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, third edit. Academic Press, USAWorld Meteorological Organization (2012) Standardized precipitation index user Guide (M. Svoboda, M. Hayes and D. Wood). (WMO - No. 1090), Geneva

Characterising droughts in Central America with uncertain hydro-meteorological data

Central America is frequently affected by droughts that cause significant socio-economic and environmental problems. Drought characterisation, monitoring and forecasting are potentially useful to support water resource management. Drought indices are designed for these purposes, but their ability to characterise droughts depends on the characteristics of the regional climate and the quality of the available data. Local comprehensive and high-quality observational networks of meteorological and hydrological data are not available, which limits the choice of drought indices and makes it important to assess available datasets. This study evaluated which combinations of drought index and meteorological dataset were most suitable for characterising droughts in the region. We evaluated the standardised precipitation index (SPI), a modified version of the deciles index (DI), the standardised precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) and the effective drought index (EDI). These were calculated using precipitation data from the Climate Hazards Group Infra-Red Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS), the CRN073 dataset, the Climate Research Unit (CRU), ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA-Interim) and a regional station dataset, and temperature from the CRU and ERA-Interim datasets. The gridded meteorological precipitation datasets were compared to assess how well they captured key features of the regional climate. The performance of all the drought indices calculated with all the meteorological datasets was then evaluated against a drought index calculated using river discharge data. Results showed that the selection of database was more important than the selection of drought index and that the best combinations were the EDI and DI calculated with CHIRPS and CRN073. Results also highlighted the importance of including indices like SPEI for drought assessment in Central America.Universidad de Costa Rica/[805-B0-810]/UCR/Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa Rica/[805-A9-532]/UCR/Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa Rica/[805-B3-600]/UCR/Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa Rica/[805-B0-065]/UCR/Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa Rica/[805-B3-413]/UCR/Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa Rica/[805-B4-227]/UCR/Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa Rica/[805-B4-228]/UCR/Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa Rica/[805-B5-295]/UCR/Costa RicaUppsala University/[54100006]//SueciaMarie Curie Intra-European Fellowship/[No.329762]//EuropaUCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ciencias Básicas::Centro de Investigaciones Geofísicas (CIGEFI)UCR::Vicerrectoría de Docencia::Ciencias Básicas::Facultad de Ciencias::Escuela de Físic

A Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Approach to Evaluate the Performance of Three Meteorological Drought Indices in Northwest of Iran

Although meteorological drought indices are considered as important tools for drought monitoring, they are embedded with different theoretical and experimental structures. Regarding the different geographic and climatic conditions around the world, the most meteorological drought indices have been commonly applied for drought monitoring in different parts of the world. Interestingly, it is observed that such indices in the published studies on drought monitoring have usually yielded inconsistent performance. On the other hand, most studies on drought monitoring as well as the performance of drought indices has been based on short-term historical data (less than 50 years). Therefore, this study aimed to analyze and compare the performance of three common indices of SPI, RAI and PNPI to predict long-term drought events using the Monte Carlo procedure and historical data. To do this end, the 50-year recorded or historical rainfall data across 11 synoptic stations in the Northwest of Iran were employed to generate 1000 synthetic data series so that the characteristics of long-term drought might be determined and the performance of those three indices might be analyzed and compared. The results indicated a very high comparative advantage of the SPI in terms of yielding a satisfactory and detailed analysis to determine the characteristics of long-term drought. Also, the RAI indicated significant deviations from normalized natural processes. However, these results could not reasonably and sufficiently predict long-term drought. Finally, the PNPI was determined as the most uncertain and spatial index (depending on average or coefficient of variation of rainfall data) in drought monitoring

A Water Balance Derived Drought Index for Pinios River Basin, Greece

This study estimates hydrological drought characteristics using a water balance derived drought index in Pinios river basin, Thessaly, Greece. The concept of hydrological management at subwatershed scale has been adopted because it encompasses the areal extent of a drought event. Fourteen (14) sub-watersheds of Pinios river basin were delineated according to the major tributaries of Pinios river using GIS. For the assessment of hydrological drought, because none of the sub-watersheds have flow gauge stations at their outlets, a six-parameter monthly conceptual water balance model (UTHBAL model), has been applied regionally to simulate runoff for the period October 1960-September 2002. The synthetic runoff was normalized through Box-Cox transformation and standardized to the mean runoff to produce the water balance derived drought index for hydrological drought assessment. The standardized precipitation index (SPI) at multiple time scales and four indices of the Palmer method (i.e. PDSI, WPLM, PHDI and the Palmer moisture anomaly Z-index) were also calculated to assess hydrological droughts. The results showed that the water balance derived drought index is a good indicator of hydrological drought in all sub-watersheds, since is capable to quantify drought severity and duration. Furthermore, the drought index provides guidance on the selection of an appropriate meteorological drought index for operational hydrological drought monitoring. Hence, SPI at 3- and 6-month timescales and the WPLM could be used along with the water balance derived drought index in risk and decision analyses at the study area

Evaluation of Markov Chain Based Drought Forecasts in an Andean Regulated River Basin Using the Skill Scores RPS and GMSS

On behalf of the decision-makers of Andean regulated river basins a drought index was developed to predict the occurrence and extent of drought events. Two stochastic models, the Markov Chain First Order (MCFO) and the Markov Chain Second Order (MCSO) model, predicting the frequency of monthly droughts were applied and the performance checked using two skill scores, respectively the ranked probability score (RPS) and the Gandin-Murphy skill score (GMSS). Data of the Chulco River basin (3200 4300 m.a.s.l.), situated in the Ecuadorian southern Andes, were employed to test the performance of both models. Results indicate that events with greater drought severity were more accurately predicted. The study also revealed the importance of verifying the quality of the forecasts and to have an assessment of the likely performance of the forecasting models before adopting any model and accepting the resulting information for decision-making.The research was conducted within the frame of the projects "Meteorological Cycles and Evapotranspiration along the Altitudinal Gradient of the Cajas National Park" and "Identification of hydro-meteorological processes that trigger extreme floods in the city of Cuenca using precipitation radar". Both projects were funded by the University of Cuenca and the Public Municipal Company of Water Supply from Cuenca (ETAPA). Thanks are due to INAMHI and CBRM for providing the information of the Chulco river basin.Avilés, A.; Célleri-Alvear, R.; Paredes Arquiola, J.; Solera Solera, A. (2015). Evaluation of Markov Chain Based Drought Forecasts in an Andean Regulated River Basin Using the Skill Scores RPS and GMSS. Water Resources Management. 29(6):1949-1963. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-0921-219491963296Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 19:716–723. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705Banimahd SA, Khalili D (2013) Factors influencing markov chains predictability characteristics, utilizing SPI, RDI, EDI and SPEI drought indices in different climatic zones. Water Resour Manag 27:3911–3928. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0387-zBarua S, Asce SM, Ng AWM, Perera BJC (2011) Comparative evaluation of drought indexes : case study on the Yarra River catchment in Australia. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137:215–226. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000105Barua S, Ng A, Perera B (2012) Drought assessment and forecasting: a case study on the Yarra River catchment in Victoria, Australia. Aust J Water Resour 15:95–108. doi: 10.7158/W10-848.2012.15.2Beniston M (2003) Climatic change in mountain regions: a review of possible impacts. Clim Chang 59:5–31Buytaert W, Célleri R, De Bièvre B et al (2006a) Human impact on the hydrology of the Andean páramos. Earth Sci Rev 79:53–72. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.06.002Buytaert W, Celleri R, Willems P (2006b) Spatial and temporal rainfall variability in mountainous areas: a case study from the south Ecuadorian Andes. J Hydrol 329:413–421. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.031Cancelliere A, Di Mauro G, Bonaccorso B, Rossi G (2007) Drought forecasting using the Standardized Precipitation Index. Water Resour Manag 21:801–819. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9062-yCelleri R, Willems P, Buytaert W, Feyen J (2007) Space – time rainfall variability in the Paute Basin, Ecuadorian Andes. Hydrol Process 21:3316–3327. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6575Gandin LS, Murphy AH (1992) Equitable Skills scores for categorical forecast. Mon Weather Rev 120:361–370Gerrity JP (1992) A note on Gandin and Murphy’s Equitable Skill Scores. Mon Weather Rev 120:2709–2712Keyantash JA, Dracup JA (2004) An aggregate drought index: assessing drought severity based on fluctuations in the hydrologic cycle and surface water storage. Water Resour Res 40:1–13. doi: 10.1029/2003WR002610Khalili D, Farnoud T, Jamshidi H et al (2011) Comparability analyses of the SPI and RDI meteorological drought indices in different climatic zones. Water Resour Manag 25:1737–1757. doi: 10.1007/s11269-010-9772-zLabadie JW, Asce M (2004) Optimal operation of multireservoir systems : state-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130:93–111. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:2~93!Lee S-E, Seo K-H (2013) The development of a statistical forecast model for changma. Weather Forecast 28:1304–1321. doi: 10.1175/WAF-D-13-00003.1Liu Y, Gupta H, Springer E, Wagener T (2008) Linking science with environmental decision making: experiences from an integrated modeling approach to supporting sustainable water resources management. Environ Model Softw 23:846–858. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.007Lohani VK, Loganathan GV (1997) An early warning system for drought management using the Palmer drought index. J Am Water Resour Assoc 33:1375–1386Mason SJ (2004) On using “Climatology” as a reference strategy in the brier and ranked probability skill scores. Mon Weather Rev 132:1891–1895Mauget S, Ko J (2008) A two-tier statistical forecast method for agricultural and resource management simulations. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:1573–1589. doi: 10.1175/2007JAMC1749.1McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Proc. 8th Conf. Appl. Climatol. American Meteorological Society Boston, MA, pp 179–183Mishra a K, Desai VR (2005) Drought forecasting using stochastic models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:326–339. doi: 10.1007/s00477-005-0238-4Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) Review paper A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391:202–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012Mishra AK, Desai VR, Singh VP, Asce F (2007) Drought forecasting using a hybrid stochastic and neural network model. J Hydrol Eng 12:626–638. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:6(626)Moreira EE, Coelho C, Paulo A a et al (2008) SPI-based drought category prediction using loglinear models. J Hydrol 354:116–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.002Muller WA, Appenzeller C, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Liniger MA (2005) A debiased ranked probability skill score to evaluate probabilistic ensemble forecasts with small ensemble sizes. J Clim 18:1513–1523. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3361.1Murphy A (1971) A note on the ranked probability score. J Appl Meteorol 10:155–156Murphy AH (1977) The value of climatological, categorical and probabilistic forecasts in the cost-loss ratio situation. Mon Weather Rev 105:803–816. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1977)1052.0.CO;2Nalbantis I, Tsakiris G (2009) Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resour Manag 23:881–897. doi: 10.1007/s11269-008-9305-1Palmer W (1965) Meteorological drought. Paper 45:65Panu US, Sharma TC (2002) Challenges in drought research: some perspectives and future directions. Hydrol Sci J 47:S19–S30. doi: 10.1080/02626660209493019Paulo A, Pereira LS (2007) Prediction of SPI drought class transitions using Markov chains. Water Resour Manag 21:1813–1827. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9129-9Ries H, Schlünzen KH, Brümmer B et al (2010) Impact of surface parameter uncertainties on the development of a trough in the Fram Strait region. Tellus A 62:377–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00451.xRobertson DE, Wang QJ (2013) Seasonal forecasts of unregulated inflows into the Murray River, Australia. Water Resour Manag 27:2747–2769. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0313-4Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464Shukla S, Wood AW (2008) Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophys Res Lett 35:1–7. doi: 10.1029/2007GL032487Steinemann A (2003) Drought indicators and triggers: a stochastic approach to evaluation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39:1217–1233Steinemann AC, Cavalcanti LF (2006) Developing multiple indicators and triggers for drought plans. J Water Resour Plan Manag 132:164–174. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:3(164)Svoboda M, Hayes M, Wilhite D, Tadesse T (2004) Recent advances in drought monitoring. Drought Mitig Cent Fac Publ 6Tsakiris G, Vangelis H (2005) Establishing a drought index incorporating evapotranspiration. Eur Water 9:3–11Vicente-Serrano SM, Beguería S, López-Moreno JI (2010) A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J Clim 23:1696–1718. doi: 10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1Viviroli D, Archer DR, Buytaert W et al (2011) Climate change and mountain water resources: overview and recommendations for research, management and policy. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:471–504. doi: 10.5194/hess-15-471-2011Westphal KS, Laramie RL, Borgatti D, Stoops R (2007) Drought Management Planning with Economic and Risk Factors. J Water Resour Plan Manag 133:351–362. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:4(351)Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Third Edit. 704Zhang H, Casey T (2000) Verification of categorical probability forecasts. Weather Forecast 15:80–8