ANIMAL MODELS FOR THE STUDY OF LEISHMANIASIS IMMUNOLOGY

Leishmaniasis remains a major public health problem worldwide and is classified as Category I by the TDR/WHO, mainly due to the absence of control. Many experimental models like rodents, dogs and monkeys have been developed, each with specific features, in order to characterize the immune response to Leishmania species, but none reproduces the pathology observed in human disease. Conflicting data may arise in part because different parasite strains or species are being examined, different tissue targets (mice footpad, ear, or base of tail) are being infected, and different numbers (“low” 1×102 and “high” 1×106) of metacyclic promastigotes have been inoculated. Recently, new approaches have been proposed to provide more meaningful data regarding the host response and pathogenesis that parallels human disease. The use of sand fly saliva and low numbers of parasites in experimental infections has led to mimic natural transmission and find new molecules and immune mechanisms which should be considered when designing vaccines and control strategies. Moreover, the use of wild rodents as experimental models has been proposed as a good alternative for studying the host-pathogen relationships and for testing candidate vaccines. To date, using natural reservoirs to study Leishmania infection has been challenging because immunologic reagents for use in wild rodents are lacking. This review discusses the principal immunological findings against Leishmania infection in different animal models highlighting the importance of using experimental conditions similar to natural transmission and reservoir species as experimental models to study the immunopathology of the disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Lobar analysis with hyperpolarized 129Xe MR imaging

PURPOSE: To compare lobar ventilation and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained with hyperpolarized xenon 129 ((129)Xe) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to quantitative computed tomography (CT) metrics on a lobar basis and pulmonary function test (PFT) results on a whole-lung basis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-two patients with COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II-IV) underwent hyperpolarized (129)Xe MR imaging at 1.5 T, quantitative CT, and PFTs. Whole-lung and lobar (129)Xe MR imaging parameters were obtained by using automated segmentation of multisection hyperpolarized (129)Xe MR ventilation images and hyperpolarized (129)Xe MR diffusion-weighted images after coregistration to CT scans. Whole-lung and lobar quantitative CT-derived metrics for emphysema and bronchial wall thickness were calculated. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the relationship between imaging measures and PFT results. RESULTS: Percentage ventilated volume and average ADC at lobar (129)Xe MR imaging showed correlation with percentage emphysema at lobar quantitative CT (r = -0.32, P < .001 and r = 0.75, P < .0001, respectively). The average ADC at whole-lung (129)Xe MR imaging showed moderate correlation with PFT results (percentage predicted transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide [Tlco]: r = -0.61, P < .005) and percentage predicted functional residual capacity (r = 0.47, P < .05). Whole-lung quantitative CT percentage emphysema also showed statistically significant correlation with percentage predicted Tlco (r = -0.65, P < .005). CONCLUSION: Lobar ventilation and ADC values obtained from hyperpolarized (129)Xe MR imaging demonstrated correlation with quantitative CT percentage emphysema on a lobar basis and with PFT results on a whole-lung basis

Parietal fibrinous peritonitis in cattle: A literature review

peer reviewedBackground: Parietal fibrinous peritonitis (PFP) is a complication of laparotomy in cattle, consisting of fluid and fibrin accumulation within a fibrous capsule between the parietal peritoneum and the abdominal muscles. Since scientific information on PFP is scarce, we aim to collect available information to help practitioners in its diagnosis and treatment, and to formulate research perspectives. Methods: PubMed and GoogleScholar databases were scanned using “cattle” or “bovine”, and one of the following keywords: “seroma”, “parietal fibrinous peritonitis”, “retroperitoneal abscess”, or “wound infection”. Results: Although scientific information is often anecdotal, two recent larger studies shed more light on PFP symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Symptoms vary according to the cavity’s localisation and size, and include anorexia, weight loss and an inflammatory status. Rectal palpation is strongly indicative, but the definitive diagnosis is made by ultrasound. Trueperella pyogenes and Escherichia coli are frequently isolated germs, although it remains unclear whether they are primary or secondary agents. Good survival rates were reported after surgical drainage. Conclusion: Although the diagnosis and treatment seem clear, the exact pathogenesis of PFP should be the focus of ongoing research. This can be achieved by epidemiological data analysis focusing on risk factors like surgery technique, housing and ration