5 research outputs found

    Beyond 5G Private Networks: the 5G CONNI Perspective

    No full text
    International audienceFuture Smart Factories will leverage Industry 4.0 and 5G technology to increase both flexibility and efficiency of manufacturing processes, thus ensuring global competitiveness of industrial manufacturing. 5G technologies such as network slicing may accommodate industrial applications in public networks, while Private 5G Networks, operating locally and being highly optimized towards specific applications, may require disruptive technologies to meet the specific and challenging industrial use cases requirements. The 5G CONNI Europe-Taiwan project investigates innovative solutions for Private 5G and beyond Network. This includes the definition of new architectures and measurements tools as well as, the development of innovative technologies and their enabling components in the context of mobile edge assisted URLLC. Building on the premise of Private 5G Networks, the 5G CONNI project will offer an unprecedented integrated end-to-end 5G testing network for testing specifically industrial applications in accordance with updated 5G standardization specifications. The 5G CONNI project will validate its innovative and technologically advanced solutions and components with a real-field cross-continental end-to-end industrial Private 5G Network demonstration between two interconnected industrial manufacturing sites in Taiwan and in Europe

    Predominantly Persistent Intraretinal Fluid in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

    Full text link

    Lapses in Care Among Patients Assigned to Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

    Full text link

    Four-Year Visual Outcomes in the Protocol W Randomized Trial of Intravitreous Aflibercept for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy

    Full text link
    ImportanceAnti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections in eyes with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) without center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) reduce development of vision-threatening complications from diabetes over at least 2 years, but whether this treatment has a longer-term benefit on visual acuity is unknown.ObjectiveTo compare the primary 4-year outcomes of visual acuity and rates of vision-threatening complications in eyes with moderate to severe NPDR treated with intravitreal aflibercept compared with sham. The primary 2-year analysis of this study has been reported.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRandomized clinical trial conducted at 64 clinical sites in the US and Canada from January 2016 to March 2018, enrolling 328 adults (399 eyes) with moderate to severe NPDR (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] severity level 43-53) without CI-DME.InterventionsEyes were randomly assigned to 2.0 mg aflibercept (n = 200) or sham (n = 199). Eight injections were administered at defined intervals through 2 years, continuing quarterly through 4 years unless the eye improved to mild NPDR or better. Aflibercept was given in both groups to treat development of high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or CI-DME with vision loss.Main Outcomes and MeasuresDevelopment of PDR or CI-DME with vision loss (≥10 letters at 1 visit or ≥5 letters at 2 consecutive visits) and change in visual acuity (best corrected ETDRS letter score) from baseline to 4 years.ResultsAmong participants (mean age 56 years; 42.4% female; 5% Asian, 15% Black, 32% Hispanic, 45% White), the 4-year cumulative probability of developing PDR or CI-DME with vision loss was 33.9% with aflibercept vs 56.9% with sham (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.40 [97.5% CI, 0.28 to 0.57]; P &amp;amp;lt; .001). The mean (SD) change in visual acuity from baseline to 4 years was −2.7 (6.5) letters with aflibercept and −2.4 (5.8) letters with sham (adjusted mean difference, −0.5 letters [97.5% CI, −2.3 to 1.3]; P = .52). Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration cardiovascular/cerebrovascular event rates were 9.9% (7 of 71) in bilateral participants, 10.9% (14 of 129) in unilateral aflibercept participants, and 7.8% (10 of 128) in unilateral sham participants.Conclusions and RelevanceAmong patients with NPDR but without CI-DME, at 4 years treatment with aflibercept vs sham, initiating aflibercept treatment only if vision-threatening complications developed, resulted in statistically significant anatomic improvement but no improvement in visual acuity. Aflibercept as a preventive strategy, as used in this trial, may not be generally warranted for patients with NPDR without CI-DME.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02634333</jats:sec

    Subretinal Hyperreflective Material in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

    No full text
    corecore