Collateral fitness effects of mutations

Mutations act as a driving force of evolution by providing the genetic variation upon which selective pressures act. The underlying mechanisms by which mutations lead to fitness effects are typically attributed to changes in protein specific activity or abundance. Here, we reveal the importance of a mutation’s collateral fitness effects, which we define as effects that do not derive from changes in the protein’s ability to perform its physiological function. We constructed libraries of all single-codon substitutions in four antibiotic resistance genes native to Escherichia coli. We used deep mutational scanning to comprehensively measure the collateral fitness effects of these mutations during growth competition experiments in the absence of antibiotic. We found that over 42% of all missense mutations in TEM-1 beta-lactamase were deleterious to growth rate in the absence of antibiotic, indicating that for some proteins, collateral fitness effects occur as frequently as effects on protein activity and abundance. Deleterious mutations caused improper post-translational processing, incorrect disulfide-bond formation, protein aggregation, changes in gene expression, and pleiotropic changes in cell phenotype. Deleterious collateral fitness effects occurred more frequently in TEM-1 than deleterious effects on antibiotic resistance in environments with low concentrations of the antibiotic. The prevalence of deleterious collateral fitness effects suggests they may play a role in constraining protein evolution, particularly for highly-expressed proteins, for proteins under intermittent selection for their physiological function, and for proteins whose contribution to fitness is buffered against deleterious effects on protein activity and protein abundance. We found evidence of deleterious collateral fitness effects, but at a lower frequency, in the NDM-1, CAT-I, and AadB antibiotic resistance proteins, suggesting different proteins have different propensities for collateral fitness effects. By identifying the frequency, magnitude, and mechanisms of collateral fitness effects and how they differ across genes, one can understand their role in genetic selection and the shaping of protein evolutionary pathways

Collateral fitness effects of mutations

Mutations act as a driving force of evolution by providing the genetic variation upon which selective pressures act. The underlying mechanisms by which mutations lead to fitness effects are typically attributed to changes in protein specific activity or abundance. Here, we reveal the importance of a mutation’s collateral fitness effects, which we define as effects that do not derive from changes in the protein’s ability to perform its physiological function. We constructed libraries of all single-codon substitutions in four antibiotic resistance genes native to Escherichia coli. We used deep mutational scanning to comprehensively measure the collateral fitness effects of these mutations during growth competition experiments in the absence of antibiotic. We found that over 42% of all missense mutations in TEM-1 beta-lactamase were deleterious to growth rate in the absence of antibiotic, indicating that for some proteins, collateral fitness effects occur as frequently as effects on protein activity and abundance. Deleterious mutations caused improper post-translational processing, incorrect disulfide-bond formation, protein aggregation, changes in gene expression, and pleiotropic changes in cell phenotype. Deleterious collateral fitness effects occurred more frequently in TEM-1 than deleterious effects on antibiotic resistance in environments with low concentrations of the antibiotic. The prevalence of deleterious collateral fitness effects suggests they may play a role in constraining protein evolution, particularly for highly-expressed proteins, for proteins under intermittent selection for their physiological function, and for proteins whose contribution to fitness is buffered against deleterious effects on protein activity and protein abundance. We found evidence of deleterious collateral fitness effects, but at a lower frequency, in the NDM-1, CAT-I, and AadB antibiotic resistance proteins, suggesting different proteins have different propensities for collateral fitness effects. By identifying the frequency, magnitude, and mechanisms of collateral fitness effects and how they differ across genes, one can understand their role in genetic selection and the shaping of protein evolutionary pathways

Genes Vary Greatly in Their Propensity for Collateral Fitness Effects of Mutations

AbstractMutations can have deleterious fitness effects when they decrease protein specific activity or decrease active protein abundance. Mutations will also be deleterious when they cause misfolding or misinteractions that are toxic to the cell (i.e., independent of whether the mutations affect specific activity and abundance). The extent to which protein evolution is shaped by these and other collateral fitness effects is unclear in part because little is known of their frequency and magnitude. Using deep mutational scanning (DMS), we previously found at least 42% of missense mutations in the TEM-1 β-lactamase antibiotic resistance gene cause deleterious collateral fitness effects. Here, we used DMS to comprehensively determine the collateral fitness effects of missense mutations in three genes encoding the antibiotic resistance proteins New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1), chloramphenicol acetyltransferase I (CAT-I), and 2″-aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase (AadB). AadB (20%), CAT-I (0.9%), and NDM-1 (0.2%) were less susceptible to deleterious collateral fitness effects than TEM-1 (42%) indicating that genes have different propensities for these effects. As was observed with TEM-1, all the studied deleterious aadB mutants increased aggregation. However, aggregation did not correlate with collateral fitness effects for many of the deleterious mutants of CAT-I and NDM-1. Select deleterious mutants caused unexpected phenotypes to emerge. The introduction of internal start codons in CAT-1 caused loss of the episome and a mutation in aadB made its cognate antibiotic essential for growth. Our study illustrates how the complexity of the cell provides a rich environment for collateral fitness effects and new phenotypes to emerge.</jats:p

Collateral fitness effects of mutations

AbstractThe distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of mutation plays a central role in constraining protein evolution. The underlying mechanisms by which mutations lead to fitness effects are typically attributed to changes in protein specific activity or abundance. Here, we reveal the importance of a mutation’s collateral fitness effects, which we define as effects that do not derive from changes in the protein’s ability to perform its physiological function. We comprehensively measured the collateral fitness effects of missense mutations in theE. coli TEM-1β-lactamase antibiotic resistance gene using growth competition experiments in theabsenceof antibiotic. At least 42% of missense mutations inTEM-1were deleterious, indicating that for some proteins, collateral fitness effects occur as frequently as effects on protein activity and abundance. Deleterious mutations caused improper post-translational processing, incorrect disulfide-bond formation, protein aggregation, changes in gene expression, and pleiotropic effects on cell phenotype. Deleterious collateral fitness effects occurred more frequently inTEM-1than deleterious effects on antibiotic resistance in environments with low concentrations of the antibiotic. The surprising prevalence of deleterious collateral fitness effects suggests they may play a role in constraining protein evolution, particularly for highly-expressed proteins, for proteins under intermittent selection for their physiological function, and for proteins whose contribution to fitness is buffered against mutations with deleterious effects on protein activity and protein abundance.Significance StatementMutations provide the source of genetic variability upon which evolution acts. Deleterious protein mutations are commonly thought of in terms of how they compromise the protein’s ability to perform its physiological function. However, mutations might also be deleterious if they cause negative effects on one of the countless other cellular processes. The frequency and magnitude of such collateral fitness effects is unknown. Our systematic study of mutations in a bacterial protein finds widespread collateral fitness effects that were associated with protein aggregation, improper protein processing, incomplete protein transport across membranes, incorrect disulfide-bond formation, induction of stress-response pathways, and unexpected changes in cell properties. Our results suggest that deleterious collateral fitness effects may be an important constraint on protein evolution.</jats:sec

Collateral fitness effects of mutations

The distribution of fitness effects of mutation plays a central role in constraining protein evolution. The underlying mechanisms by which mutations lead to fitness effects are typically attributed to changes in protein specific activity or abundance. Here, we reveal the importance of a mutation’s collateral fitness effects, which we define as effects that do not derive from changes in the protein’s ability to perform its physiological function. We comprehensively measured the collateral fitness effects of missense mutations in the Escherichia coli TEM-1 β-lactamase antibiotic resistance gene using growth competition experiments in the absence of antibiotic. At least 42% of missense mutations in TEM-1 were deleterious, indicating that for some proteins collateral fitness effects occur as frequently as effects on protein activity and abundance. Deleterious mutations caused improper posttranslational processing, incorrect disulfide-bond formation, protein aggregation, changes in gene expression, and pleiotropic effects on cell phenotype. Deleterious collateral fitness effects occurred more frequently in TEM-1 than deleterious effects on antibiotic resistance in environments with low concentrations of the antibiotic. The surprising prevalence of deleterious collateral fitness effects suggests they may play a role in constraining protein evolution, particularly for highly expressed proteins, for proteins under intermittent selection for their physiological function, and for proteins whose contribution to fitness is buffered against deleterious effects on protein activity and protein abundance. </jats:p