Payer le prix? Conciliation travail universitaire et famille pendant la pandémie de la COVID-19

Introduction: The shift to remote working/learning to slow transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has had widespread mental health impacts. We aimed to describe how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the mental health of students and faculty within a health sciences faculty at a central Canadian university. Methods: Via an online survey, we queried mental health in the first four months of the COVID-19 pandemic quantitatively (scale: 1 (most negative)-100 (most positive)) and qualitatively. Results: The sample (n = 110) was predominantly women (faculty 39/59; [66.1%]; students 46/50; [92.0%]). Most faculty were married/common law (50/60; [84.8%]) and had children at home (36/60; [60.0%]); the opposite was true for most students.  Faculty and students self-reported comparable mental health (40.47±24.26 and 37.62±26.13; respectively). Amongst women, those with vs. without children at home, reported significantly worse mental health impacts (31.78±23.68 vs. 44.29±27.98; respectively, p = 0.032). Qualitative themes included: “Sharing resources,” “spending money,” “few changes,” for those without children at home; “working at home can be isolating,” including the subtheme, “balancing act”: “working in isolation,” “working more,” for those with children at home. Discussion: Amongst women in academia, including both students and faculty, those with children at home have disproportionately worse mental health than those without children at home.Introduction : Le virage vers le travail et l’enseignement à distance pour ralentir la transmission du virus SRAS-CoV-2 a eu des répercussions étendues sur la santé mentale. Notre étude vise à décrie l’impact de la pandémie de la COVID-19 sur la santé mentale des étudiants et du corps professoral au sein Faculté des sciences de la santé d’une université du centre du Canada. Méthodes : Un questionnaire en ligne a été administré pour récolter des données qualitatives et quantitatives (échelle : de 1 [le plus négatif] à 100 [le plus positif] à l’égard de la santé mentale des participants au cours des quatre premiers mois de la pandémie. Résultats : L’échantillonnage (n = 110) était majoritairement composé de femmes (membres du corps professoral : 39/59 ou 66,1 %; étudiantes 46/50 ou 92,0 %). La plupart des répondants du corps professoral étaient mariés ou en union libre (50/60 ou 84,8 %) et avaient des enfants à la maison (36/60 ou 60,0 %). Le contraire était vrai pour la plupart des étudiants. L’état de santé mentale déclaré par le corps professoral et les étudiants était comparable (40,47±24,26 et 37,62±26,13 respectivement). Parmi les femmes, autant celles qui avaient des enfants à la maison que celles qui n’en avaient pas, ont déclaré que leur santé mentale était nettement moins bonne (31,78±23,68 contre 44,29±27,98 respectivement; p = 0,032). Pendant l’analyse des données qualitatives, on a identifié les thèmes « le partage de ressources », « les dépenses » et « peu de changements » pour les répondants qui n’avaient pas d’enfants à la maison alors que les thème « le télétravail accentue l’isolement », ainsi que lessous-thèmes « maintien de l’équilibre : travailler en isolement’’ et ‘’travailler plus » ont émergé pour ceux qui avaient des enfants à la maison. Discussion : Parmi les femmes œuvrant dans le milieu universitaire, qu’elles soient étudiantes ou membres du corps professoral, la santé mentale de celles qui ont des enfants à la maison est davantage affectée que celle des femmes qui n’en ont pas

Paying the price? Academic work and parenting during COVID-19

Introduction: The shift to remote working/learning to slow transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has had widespread mental health impacts. We aimed to describe how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the mental health of students and faculty within a health sciences faculty at a central Canadian university.Methods: Via an online survey, we queried mental health in the first four months of the COVID-19 pandemic quantitatively (scale: 1 (most negative)-100 (most positive)) and qualitatively.Results: The sample (n = 110) was predominantly women (faculty 39/59; [66.1%]; students 46/50; [92.0%]). Most faculty were married/common law (50/60; [84.8%]) and had children at home (36/60; [60.0%]); the opposite was true for most students. Faculty and students self-reported comparable mental health (40.47±24.26 and 37.62±26.13; respectively). Amongst women, those with vs. without children at home, reported significantly worse mental health impacts (31.78±23.68 vs. 44.29±27.98; respectively, p = 0.032).Qualitative themes included: “Sharing resources,” “spending money,” “few changes,” for those without children at home; “working at home can be isolating,” including the subtheme, “balancing act”: “working in isolation,” “working more,” for those with children at home.Discussion: Amongst women in academia, including both students and faculty, those with children at home have disproportionately worse mental health than those without children at home.Introduction : Le virage vers le travail et l’enseignement à distance pour ralentir la transmission du virus SRAS-CoV-2 a eu des répercussions étendues sur la santé mentale. Notre étude vise à décrie l’impact de la pandémie de la COVID-19 sur la santé mentale des étudiants et du corps professoral au sein Faculté des sciences de la santé d’une université du centre du Canada.Méthodes : Un questionnaire en ligne a été administré pour récolter des données qualitatives et quantitatives (échelle : de 1 [le plus négatif] à 100 [le plus positif] à l’égard de la santé mentale des participants au cours des quatre premiers mois de la pandémie.Résultats : L’échantillonnage (n = 110) était majoritairement composé de femmes (membres du corps professoral : 39/59 ou 66,1 %; étudiantes 46/50 ou 92,0 %). La plupart des répondants du corps professoral étaient mariés ou en union libre (50/60 ou 84,8 %) et avaient des enfants à la maison (36/60 ou 60,0 %). Le contraire était vrai pour la plupart des étudiants. L’état de santé mentale déclaré par le corps professoral et les étudiants était comparable (40,47±24,26 et 37,62±26,13 respectivement). Parmi les femmes, autant celles qui avaient des enfants à la maison que celles qui n’en avaient pas, ont déclaré que leur santé mentale était nettement moins bonne (31,78±23,68 contre 44,29±27,98 respectivement; p = 0,032).Pendant l’analyse des données qualitatives, on a identifié les thèmes « le partage de ressources », « les dépenses » et « peu de changements » pour les répondants qui n’avaient pas d’enfants à la maison alors que les thème « le télétravail accentue l’isolement », ainsi que lessous-thèmes « maintien de l’équilibre : travailler en isolement’’ et ‘’travailler plus » ont émergé pour ceux qui avaient des enfants à la maison.Discussion : Parmi les femmes œuvrant dans le milieu universitaire, qu’elles soient étudiantes ou membres du corps professoral, la santé mentale de celles qui ont des enfants à la maison est davantage affectée que celle des femmes qui n’en ont pas

Paying the price? Academic work and parenting during COVID-19

Introduction: The shift to remote working/learning to slow transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has had widespread mental health impacts. We aimed to describe how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the mental health of students and faculty within a health sciences faculty at a central Canadian university. Methods: Via an online survey, we queried mental health in the first four months of the COVID-19 pandemic quantitatively (scale: 1 (most negative)-100 (most positive)) and qualitatively. Results: The sample (n = 110) was predominantly women (faculty 39/59; [66.1%]; students 46/50; [92.0%]). Most faculty were married/common law (50/60; [84.8%]) and had children at home (36/60; [60.0%]); the opposite was true for most students.  Faculty and students self-reported comparable mental health (40.47±24.26 and 37.62±26.13; respectively). Amongst women, those with vs. without children at home, reported significantly worse mental health impacts (31.78±23.68 vs. 44.29±27.98; respectively, p = 0.032). Qualitative themes included: “Sharing resources,” “spending money,” “few changes,” for those without children at home; “working at home can be isolating,” including the subtheme, “balancing act”: “working in isolation,” “working more,” for those with children at home. Discussion: Amongst women in academia, including both students and faculty, those with children at home have disproportionately worse mental health than those without children at home.</jats:p

An online, peer-mentored food allergy education program improves children’s and parents’ confidence

Abstract Background Children with food allergy, and their families experience substantial burdens because of efforts necessary to minimize the risk of anaphylaxis. To this end, peer-to-peer education is paramount. Food Allergy Canada offers an online, peer-to-peer mentoring program. However, the impact of this program has not previously been formally evaluated. Objective To determine if Allergy Pals, an online, peer-to-peer mentoring program, for children aged 7–11 years, increased child and parental food allergy competency, and confidence. Our secondary aim was to qualitatively describe the experiences of the program. Methods From May 2020-May 2021, children and their parents were invited to participate in an online, anonymous survey about Allergy Pals, at pre-program, and post-program. Primary outcomes, which were described and compared using chi2 or t-tests, as appropriate for the respective variables, included food allergy competence (epinephrine carriage, signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis) and food allergy confidence (e.g. comfort asking other for food allergy-related support). Secondary outcomes included child and parent perceptions of the program, which were analysed thematically. Results Overall, 17 children completed the pre-program, and 11 completed the post-program survey. Corresponding numbers for parents were 25 and 23. Food allergy competence was high pre-program, and remained so post-program. Food allergy confidence improved from pre-program to post-program. E.g. Children tended to feel less left out (5/12, 41.7%; 3/10; 30.0%, respectively), a finding that was reflected also in parents’ scores. Themes identified for child and parent perceptions further supported improved food allergy confidence. Conclusion Although food allergy competence was high pre-program, Allergy Pals improved food allergy confidence

“There definitely should be some more help for families”: a call for federal support for families managing pediatric food allergy

No abstract was provided

Challenges in Diagnosis of Food Allergies via Oral Food Challenges: A Qualitative Analysis of the Caregiver Perspective

Abstract Background: Food allergy disproportionately affects children and contributes to poor quality of life for families. As a result, accurate diagnosis of food allergy is important. Oral food challenges (OFC) are the gold standard test for diagnosis of food allergy. Yet, many children do not undergo OFCs. The purpose of this study was to understand the barriers to OFCs faced by parents of children with food allergies in Ontario, as well as solutions to increase their utilization.Methods: Three focus group discussions were carried out with a total of 24 parents of children with food allergies in Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario. Focus group data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis.Results: Parents misperceived OFCs as management of food allergies. They were also unsure about whether OFCs take place in hospitals, clinics or in the home. Parents reported several barriers to OFCs including not being referred by their primary care physicians, wait times, and fear and anxiety. Additionally, parents with older children, children with multiple allergies and children who could only tolerate allergens in its baked form felt that OFCs would not improve their quality of life. Solutions offered by parents to increase uptake of OFCs included education of the public, physicians and policy makers to improve knowledge and training, and ensure timely access to OFCs. Parents also suggested a need for improved counselling about the risk of OFCs, psychological support, and sharing of patient success stories. Long-term follow-up after an OFC as well as support and guidance around food reintroduction was also suggested to ensure OFCs resulted in an improvement in quality of life.Conclusion: Interventions aimed at addressing barriers to OFCs identified by parents have the potential to increase utilization of OFCs, and thereby reduce the burden of food allergies in children and improve quality of life.</jats:p