Optimising medication data collection in a large-scale clinical trial

© 2019 Lockery et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Objective: Pharmaceuticals play an important role in clinical care. However, in community-based research, medication data are commonly collected as unstructured free-text, which is prohibitively expensive to code for large-scale studies. The ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study developed a two-pronged framework to collect structured medication data for 19,114 individuals. ASPREE provides an opportunity to determine whether medication data can be cost-effectively collected and coded, en masse from the community using this framework. Methods: The ASPREE framework of type-to-search box with automated coding and linked free text entry was compared to traditional method of free-text only collection and post hoc coding. Reported medications were classified according to their method of collection and analysed by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) group. Relative cost of collecting medications was determined by calculating the time required for database set up and medication coding. Results Overall, 122,910 participant structured medication reports were entered using the type-tosearch box and 5,983 were entered as free-text. Free-text data contributed 211 unique medications not present in the type-to-search box. Spelling errors and unnecessary provision of additional information were among the top reasons why medications were reported as freetext. The cost per medication using the ASPREE method was approximately USD $0.03 compared with USD$0.20 per medication for the traditional method. Conclusion Implementation of this two-pronged framework is a cost-effective alternative to free-text only data collection in community-based research. Higher initial set-up costs of this combined method are justified by long term cost effectiveness and the scientific potential for analysis and discovery gained through collection of detailed, structured medication data

Effect of aspirin on cancer incidence and mortality in older adults.

BACKGROUND: ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (RCT) of daily low-dose aspirin (100 mg) in older adults, showed an increase in all-cause mortality, primarily due to cancer. In contrast prior RCTs, mainly involving younger individuals, demonstrated a delayed cancer benefit with aspirin. We now report a detailed analysis of cancer incidence and mortality. METHODS: 19,114 Australian and U.S. community-dwelling participants aged 70+ years (U.S. minorities 65+ years) without cardiovascular disease, dementia or physical disability were randomized and followed for a median of 4.7 years. Fatal and non-fatal cancer events, a prespecified secondary endpoint, were adjudicated based on clinical records. RESULTS: 981 cancer events occurred in the aspirin and 952 in the placebo groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for all incident cancers (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.14), hematological cancer (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.30), or all solid cancers (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.15), including by specific tumor type. However, aspirin was associated with an increased risk of incident cancer that had metastasized (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.43) or was stage 4 at diagnosis (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.45), and with higher risk of death for cancers that presented at stages 3 (HR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.03 to 4.33) or 4 (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.64). CONCLUSIONS: In older adults, aspirin treatment had an adverse effect on later stages of cancer evolution. These findings suggest that in older persons, aspirin may accelerate the progression of cancer and thus, suggest caution with its use in this age group

Prediction of disability-free survival in healthy older people

Prolonging survival in good health is a fundamental societal goal. However, the leading determinants of disability-free survival in healthy older people have not been well established. Data from ASPREE, a bi-national placebo-controlled trial of aspirin with 4.7 years median follow-up, was analysed. At enrolment, participants were healthy and without prior cardiovascular events, dementia or persistent physical disability. Disability-free survival outcome was defined as absence of dementia, persistent disability or death. Selection of potential predictors from amongst 25 biomedical, psychosocial and lifestyle variables including recognized geriatric risk factors, utilizing a machine-learning approach. Separate models were developed for men and women. The selected predictors were evaluated in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and validated internally by bootstrapping. We included 19,114 Australian and US participants aged ≥65 years (median 74 years, IQR 71.6–77.7). Common predictors of a worse prognosis in both sexes included higher age, lower Modified Mini-Mental State Examination score, lower gait speed, lower grip strength and abnormal (low or elevated) body mass index. Additional risk factors for men included current smoking, and abnormal eGFR. In women, diabetes and depression were additional predictors. The biased-corrected areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the final prognostic models at 5 years were 0.72 for men and 0.75 for women. Final models showed good calibration between the observed and predicted risks. We developed a prediction model in which age, cognitive function and gait speed were the strongest predictors of disability-free survival in healthy older people. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01038583

Associations between Metformin and Aspirin Use on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Older Adults.

Abstract Diabetes increases risk of malignancies, and this association increases with age. Metformin may protect against cancer development and progression, but results are mixed and limited to younger cohorts. We examined whether metformin, in the presence or absence of aspirin, reduces incident cancer and cancer-related mortality in older adults. ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) was a primary prevention trial of daily aspirin vs placebo which enrolled community-dwelling adults from Australia (70+ years) and the US (65+ years for minorities) followed for a median of 4.7 years. Invasive cancer was adjudicated by an expert panel. Cox proportional-hazards models, controlling for age at randomization and known cancer risk factors, were used to analyse the relationship between baseline metformin use, randomized treatment arm, cancer incidence (first in-trial cancer) and mortality. For participants with controlled diabetes, there was a significant reduction in cancer mortality in metformin users compared to nonusers (Adjusted [Adj] HR=0.24, 95%CI=0.07, 0.80), but not for cancer incidence (Adj HR=0.61, 95%CI=0.29, 1.27). For participants with uncontrolled diabetes, there was no significant difference in cancer incidence (Adj HR=0.95, 95%CI=0.66, 1.38) or mortality (Adj HR=1.18, 95%CI=0.62, 2.26) between metformin and non-metformin users. Uncontrolled diabetes, irrespective of metformin use, increased risk of cancer incidence and mortality compared to non-diabetics. Aspirin did not modify the effect of metformin on cancer incidence or mortality. Our findings show that metformin may have protective effects against cancer-related mortality for those older persons whose diabetes is well-controlled, and underscores the importance of diabetes control to minimise cancer risk.</jats:p

Helix Health Research Data Dictionary Template

As part of Monash University (Helix) Health Research Data Governance strategy a working group was established in 2019 to develop a data dictionary template for use in Health Research. This is an excel version of the template that can be output into a word document. It contains all the metadata (characteristics) that should be included in a health research data dictionary in a standardised format.</p

EFFECT OF INITIATING ASPIRIN ON CANCER EVENTS IN THE HEALTHY ELDERLY

Abstract In ASPREE, we previously reported a surprising increase in cancer-related deaths associated with initiating aspirin. We now report primary incident cancer events. Aspirin was not associated with risk of incident cancer (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.95-1.14), including non-metastatic cancer (HR=0.99, 95% CI, 0.89-1.11) and colorectal cancer (HR=1.02; 95% CI, 0.81-1.30). However, risk of incident metastatic cancer was elevated with aspirin (HR=1.18; 95% CI,0.96-1.46), although this could be attributable to chance. In ASPREE, the increase in cancer deaths associated with initiation of aspirin was not accompanied by a significant increase in overall incident cancer after 4.7 years. However, there did appear to be an increase in the incidence of advanced cancer in the aspirin arm. These data support the possibility that aspirin may adversely affect short-term outcomes among elderly participants with undiagnosed cancers (e.g. prevalent tumors at enrollment or early incident tumors) and/or may have differential effects according to age.</jats:p

AspiriN To Inhibit SEPSIS (ANTISEPSIS) randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, and is more common at the extremes of age. Moreover, the cost of in-hospital care for elderly patients with sepsis is significant. There are indications from experimental and observational studies that aspirin may reduce inflammation associated with infection. This paper describes the rationale and design of the AspiriN To Inhibit SEPSIS (ANTISEPSIS) trial, a substudy of ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE). ANTISEPSIS primarily aims to determine whether low-dose aspirin reduces sepsis-related deaths in older people. Additionally, it will assess whether low-dose aspirin reduces sepsis-related hospitalisations and sepsis-related Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ASPREE is a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled primary prevention trial that will determine whether daily low-dose aspirin extends disability-free longevity in 19 000 healthy older people recruited in Australia and the USA. The ANTISEPSIS substudy involves additional ASPREE trial data collection to assess the impact of daily low-dose aspirin on sepsis-related events in the 16 703 ASPREE participants aged 70 years and over, recruited in Australia. The intervention is a daily 100 mg dose of enteric-coated aspirin versus matching placebo, with 1:1 randomisation. The primary outcome for the ANTISEPSIS substudy is the incidence of sepsis-related death in eligible patients. The incidence of sepsis-related hospital and ICU admissions are secondary outcomes. ANTISEPSIS is to be conducted between 2012 and 2018. DISCUSSION: This substudy will determine whether aspirin, an inexpensive and accessible therapy, safely reduces sepsis-related deaths and hospitalisations in older Australians. If shown to be the case, this would have profound effects on the health of older Australians. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-results, ACTRN12613000349741

AspiriN To Inhibit SEPSIS (ANTISEPSIS) randomised controlled trial protocol

Introduction: Sepsis is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, and is more common at the extremes of age. Moreover, the cost of in-hospital care for elderly patients with sepsis is significant. There are indications from experimental and observational studies that aspirin may reduce inflammation associated with infection. This paper describes the rationale and design of the AspiriN To Inhibit SEPSIS (ANTISEPSIS) trial, a substudy of ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE). ANTISEPSIS primarily aims to determine whether low-dose aspirin reduces sepsis-related deaths in older people. Additionally, it will assess whether low-dose aspirin reduces sepsis-related hospitalisations and sepsis-related Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions. Methods and Analysis: ASPREE is a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled primary prevention trial that will determine whether daily low-dose aspirin extends disability-free longevity in 19 000 healthy older people recruited in Australia and the USA. The ANTISEPSIS substudy involves additional ASPREE trial data collection to assess the impact of daily low-dose aspirin on sepsis-related events in the 16 703 ASPREE participants aged 70 years and over, recruited in Australia. The intervention is a daily 100 mg dose of enteric-coated aspirin versus matching placebo, with 1:1 randomisation. The primary outcome for the ANTISEPSIS substudy is the incidence of sepsis-related death in eligible patients. The incidence of sepsis-related hospital and ICU admissions are secondary outcomes. ANTISEPSIS is to be conducted between 2012 and 2018. Discussion: This substudy will determine whether aspirin, an inexpensive and accessible therapy, safely reduces sepsis-related deaths and hospitalisations in older Australians. If shown to be the case, this would have profound effects on the health of older Australians

602Prevalence of cancer history and association with risk factors in a healthy older population

Abstract Background The ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study randomised healthy older individuals to 100mg aspirin or placebo, with clinical outcomes and disability-free survival endpoints. Detailed baseline data provides a rare opportunity to explore cancer burden and association with known cancer risk factors in this population. Methods At enrolment (2010-2014), self-reported personal cancer history, cancer type and cancer risk factor data were sought from 19,114 participants (Australia, n = 16,703; U.S., n = 2,411). Participants were healthy and expected to survive 5 years. Results Of those reporting a prior cancer diagnosis (18% women, 22% men), women were diagnosed younger (16% vs 6% of diagnoses &amp;lt;50 years). Cancer prevalence increased with age. Prostate and breast cancer history were higher in U.S. participants; melanoma and colorectal cancer were higher in Australian participants. Cancer history prevalence was not associated with any common risk factors, but was associated with poor health ratings in men. Blood and breast cancer history was more common with past aspirin use. Conclusions Personal cancer history in healthy older ASPREE participants was as expected for the most common cancer types in the respective populations. The lack of alignment with known risk factors is attributable to survivor bias, driven by entry criteria, and to possible molecular differences in cancer between elderly and younger people. Key messages As the prevalence of cancer increases with age, the lack of alignment with known risk factors implies other factors play a significant role. </jats:sec