Two-Stage Bagging Pruning for Reducing the Ensemble Size and Improving the Classification Performance

Ensemble methods, such as the traditional bagging algorithm, can usually improve the performance of a single classifier. However, they usually require large storage space as well as relatively time-consuming predictions. Many approaches were developed to reduce the ensemble size and improve the classification performance by pruning the traditional bagging algorithms. In this article, we proposed a two-stage strategy to prune the traditional bagging algorithm by combining two simple approaches: accuracy-based pruning (AP) and distance-based pruning (DP). These two methods, as well as their two combinations, “AP+DP” and “DP+AP” as the two-stage pruning strategy, were all examined. Comparing with the single pruning methods, we found that the two-stage pruning methods can furthermore reduce the ensemble size and improve the classification. “AP+DP” method generally performs better than the “DP+AP” method when using four base classifiers: decision tree, Gaussian naive Bayes, K-nearest neighbor, and logistic regression. Moreover, as compared to the traditional bagging, the two-stage method “AP+DP” improved the classification accuracy by 0.88%, 4.06%, 1.26%, and 0.96%, respectively, averaged over 28 datasets under the four base classifiers. It was also observed that “AP+DP” outperformed other three existing algorithms Brag, Nice, and TB assessed on 8 common datasets. In summary, the proposed two-stage pruning methods are simple and promising approaches, which can both reduce the ensemble size and improve the classification accuracy

Brain APOE expression quantitative trait loci-based association study identified one susceptibility locus for Alzheimer\u27s disease by interacting with APOE epsilon 4

AbstractSome studies have demonstrated interactions of AD-risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in non-APOE regions with APOE genotype. Nevertheless, no study reported interactions of expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) for APOE with APOE genotype. In present study, we included 9286 unrelated AD patients and 8479 normal controls from 12 cohorts of NIA Genetics of Alzheimer’s Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS) and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). 34 unrelated brain eQTLs for APOE were compiled from BRAINEAC and GTEx. We used multi-covariate logistic regression analysis to identify eQTLs interacted with APOE ε4. Adjusted for age and gender, substantia nigra eQTL rs438811 for APOE showed significantly strong interaction with APOE ε4 status (OR, 1.448; CI, 1.124–1.430; P-value = 7.94 × 10−6). APOE ε4-based sub-group analyses revealed that carrying one minor allele T of rs438811 can increase the opportunity of developing to AD by 26.75% in APOE ε4 carriers but not in non-carriers. We revealed substantia nigra eQTL rs438811 for APOE can interact with APOE ε4 and confers risk in APOE ε4 carriers only.</jats:p