Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk

This paper presents recommended methodologies for the quantitative analysis of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk at different spatial scales (site-specific, local, regional and national), as well as for the verification and validation of the results. The methodologies described focus on the evaluation of the probabilities of occurrence of different landslide types with certain characteristics. Methods used to determine the spatial distribution of landslide intensity, the characterisation of the elements at risk, the assessment of the potential degree of damage and the quantification of the vulnerability of the elements at risk, and those used to perform the quantitative risk analysis are also described. The paper is intended for use by scientists and practising engineers, geologists and other landslide experts

Effect of the inclusion of adsorbents on Aflatoxin B1 quantification in animal feedstuffs

The extraction efficiency of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in cattle feed containing nine adsorbents (ADSs) was investigated using two organic/aqueous solvents composed of methanol/water (80/20 v/v; MeOH) and acetone/water (85/15 v/v; AC). Samples were obtained including a highly AFB1-contaminated (HC) and a low-level AFB1-contaminated (LC) feedstuff (15.33 and 7.57 mu g kg-1, respectively), nine ADSs (four clay minerals; one yeast cell wall-based product; one activated carbon and three commercial ADS products) at two different levels of inclusion (10 and 20 g kg-1). After solvent extraction and immunoaffinity column clean-up, all samples were analysed for AFB1 by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection. For each contamination level (HC and LC), the data obtained were analysed using a factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design. Means were compared with the correspondent controls using the Dunnett's test. No statistical difference was found in AFB1 levels of feedstuffs not containing ADSs when extracted with AC or MeOH, even if numerically higher values were obtained with AC. A dose-dependent effect (p 0.01) of ADSs inclusion was observed on AFB1 recoveries that were lower when the higher ADS level (20 g kg-1) was included in the HC and LC feedstuffs. Higher AFB1 recoveries were obtained using AC compared with MeOH, both in HC (75.0% versus 12.0%, respectively) and in LC (84.0% versus 22.8%, respectively) ADSs containing feedstuffs. However, when the activated carbon and the sodium bentonite were included in feeds, lower AFB1 concentrations with respect to control values (p 0.001 and 0.05, respectively) were obtained also using AC

Clearance of an epidemic clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a drug-use network: A follow-up study in Switzerland

Background: A single clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was observed in a drug-use network starting in 1994, and was found to persist throughout 2001, with up to 19% MRSA colonization of intravenous drug users (IDUs). Recent clinical observations have shown low prevalences of this endemic drug clone among MRSA isolates. The goal of this study was to assess the evolution of MRSA carriage among IDUs. Methods: The survey took place from November 2008 to September 2009. Ten drug dispensary facilities took part. Demographic and clinical data including sex, history of MRSA, past hospitalization, use of antibiotics, and presence of wounds were collected. Screening of the nares, throat, and wounds was done. Results: Five hundred and fourteen swab specimens were obtained; 497 of them were nose/throat samples and 17 were wound swabs. MRSA was identified in 5 samples (1%). Four MRSA were found in nose/throat samples and 1 in a wound swab. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of the MRSA isolates revealed 2 different common endemic types: 4 were identified as the Zurich IDU clone and 1 as the Grison clone. Conclusions: The study shows a significant decline of MRSA colonization among IDUs. The underlying causes for this decline could not be determined fully, but we hypothesize a bundle of interventions as contributing: enhanced medical care, better wound management, isolation management, teaching IDUs basic hygiene techniques, and the national 'Four Pillars' policy. Hospital epidemiological policies such as pre-emptive isolation, length of isolation time, and screening procedures were adapted accordingly