Legislative Participation in the EU: An analysis of questions, speeches, motions and declarations in the 7th European Parliament

Which legislative activities in the European Parliament are ‘pluralistic’ – i.e. undertaken by all Members of the European Parliament, irrespective of legislative and electoral status? What type of parliamentary activity – if any – is dominated by party leaderships or vote-seekers in the European Union? This study will advance our knowledge of legislative politics in the EU by determining whether its legislature conforms to expectations from the legislative behaviour literature. This study compares the participation patterns in the EP7 (2009–2014) parliamentary questions, speeches, motions and written declarations via multilevel negative binomial regression. It makes use of a dataset on activity levels and demographics of 842 individual Members of the European Parliament serving between 2009 and 2014. The findings highlight that highly procedurally constrained activities, such as speeches and oral questions, are dominated by frontbenchers and vote-seekers, while procedurally ‘freer’ activities – written questions in particular – are very representative of the population of Members of the European Parliament. The analysis finds that there are both ‘pluralistic’ and vote-seeking activities in the ‘second order’ EU legislature, and that participation patterns broadly conform to patterns found in other established representative democracies

Soziale Integration und Politische Institutionen in Modernen Gesellschaften

Im Unterschied zu zeitgenössischen Diagnosen über den Zustand moderner Gesellschaften, geht die Analyse davon aus, daß die These der Desintegration dieser Gesellschaften empirisch völlig ungeklärt ist. Zur Durchführung von systematischen und empirischen Studien sind allererst begrifflich-theoretische Vorarbeiten nötig, zu denen die Analyse beitragen will. Es werden drei Ziele verfolgt: Erstens eine genaue Bestimmung des Begriffs der sozialen Integration. Dazu werden sechs operationale Definitionen vorgeschlagen, die sich unter anderem im Grad ihres normativen Anspruchs unterscheiden. Zweitens eine genaue Bestimmung des Begriffs der politischen Institutionen und drittens die Spezifikation eines empirisch testbaren liberalen Modells der sozialen Integration. In diesem Modell spielt die Unterstützung des politischen Institutionengefüges eines Landes eine zentrale Rolle. Die Konstruktion des Modells orientiert sich an der grundlegenden Unterscheidung eines politischen Systems in drei hierarchisch angeordnete Ebenen ' der Kultur-, Struktur- und Prozeßebene ' und konkretisiert diese Ebenen in Anlehnung an die liberale Demokratietheorie durch die Spezifikation von empirisch meßbaren Konstrukten und Zusammenhängen zwischen diesen Konstrukten.In contrast to contemporary diagnoses of the state of modern societies, this analysis assumes that the thesis of the disintegration of these societies is not empirically established at all. Systematic empirical studies require preliminary conceptual work to which this analysis contributes. The analysis sets itself three goals: firstly, it proposes a precise definition of the concept of social integration in terms of six operational definitions with different normative standards. Secondly, it suggests an accurate definition of the concept of political institutions and, thirdly, it specifies an empirically testable liberal model of social integration. In this model, support of the institutional structure of a country plays a central role. The model differentiates three levels-cultural, structural, and procedural- operationalizing them in a concrete form following liberal democratic theory. Empirically testable interrelations between the constructs are specified

Toward a polycentric low-carbon transition: the roles of community-based energy initiatives in enhancing the resilience of energy systems

An understanding of the resilience of energy systems is critical in order to tackle forthcoming challenges. This chapter proposes that the polycentric governance perspective, developed by Vincent and Elinor Ostrom, may be highly relevant in formulating policies to enhance the resilience of future energy systems. Polycentric governance systems involve the coexistence of many self-organized centers of decision making at multiple levels that are formally independent of each other, but operate under an overarching set of rules. Given this polycentric approach, this chapter studies the roles of community-based energy initiatives and, in particular, of renewable energy cooperatives, in enhancing the institutional resilience of energy systems. In this perspective, the chapter identifies three major socio-institutional obstacles, which undermine this resilience capacity: the collective action problem arising from the diffusion of sustainable energy technologies and practices, the lack of public trust in established energy actors and the existence of strong vested interests in favor of the status quo. Then, it shows why the development of community-based energy initiatives and renewable energy cooperatives may offer effective responses to these obstacles, relying on many empirical illustrations. More specifically, it is argued that community-based energy initiatives present institutional features encouraging the activation of social norms and a high trust capital, therefore enabling them to offer effective solutions to avoid free riding and enhance trust in energy institutions and organizations. The creation of federated polycentric structures may also offer a partial response to the existence of vested interests in favor of the status quo. Finally, some recommendations for policymakers are derived from this analysis