Intratumor heterogeneity of HPV integration in HPV-associated head and neck cancer

Sasa N., Kishikawa T., Mori M., et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of HPV integration in HPV-associated head and neck cancer. Nature Communications 16, 1052 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56150-z.Integration of human papillomavirus (HPV) into the host genome drives HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ HNSCC). Whole-genome sequencing of 51 tumors revealed intratumor heterogeneity of HPV integration, with 44% of breakpoints subclonal, and a biased distribution of integration breakpoints across the HPV genome. Four HPV physical states were identified, with at least 49% of tumors progressing without integration. HPV integration was associated with APOBEC-induced broad genomic instability and focal genomic instability, including structural variants at integration sites. HPV+ HNSCCs exhibited almost no smoking-induced mutational signatures. Heterozygous loss of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) was observed in 67% of tumors, with its downregulation confirmed by single-cell RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry, suggesting ATM haploinsufficiency contributes to carcinogenesis. PI3K activation was the major oncogenic mutation, with JAK-STAT activation in tumors with clonal integration and NF-kappa B activation in those without. These findings provide valuable insights into HPV integration in HPV+ HNSCC

DNA methyltransferase 3b preferentially associates with condensed chromatin

In mammals, DNA methylation is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) encoded by Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Since, the mechanisms of regulation of Dnmts are still largely unknown, the physical interaction between Dnmt3b and chromatin was investigated in vivo and in vitro. In embryonic stem cell nuclei, Dnmt3b preferentially associated with histone H1-containing heterochromatin without any significant enrichment of silent-specific histone methylation. Recombinant Dnmt3b preferentially associated with nucleosomal DNA rather than naked DNA. Incorporation of histone H1 into nucleosomal arrays promoted the association of Dnmt3b with chromatin, whereas histone acetylation reduced Dnmt3b binding in vitro. In addition, Dnmt3b associated with histone deacetylase SirT1 in the nuclease resistant chromatin. These findings suggest that Dnmt3b is preferentially recruited into hypoacetylated and condensed chromatin. We propose that Dnmt3b is a ‘reader’ of higher-order chromatin structure leading to gene silencing through DNA methylation

Essential Role for miR-196a in Brown Adipogenesis of White Fat Progenitor Cells

Brown adipocytes can differentiate from white fat progenitor cells in mice exposed to cold or β3-adrenergic stimulation, and this process is regulated by a microRNA that regulates the expression of Hoxc8, a master regulator of brown adipogenesis

Androgen-Regulated Transcriptional Control of Sialyltransferases in Prostate Cancer Cells

The expression of gangliosides is often associated with cancer progression. Sialyltransferases have received much attention in terms of their relationship with cancer because they modulate the expression of gangliosides. We previously demonstrated that GD1a production was high in castration-resistant prostate cancer cell lines, PC3 and DU145, mainly due to their high expression of β-galactoside α2,3-sialyltransferase (ST3Gal) II (not ST3Gal I), and the expression of both ST3Gals was regulated by NF-κB, mainly by RelB. We herein demonstrate that GD1a was produced in abundance in cancerous tissue samples from human patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancers as well as castration-resistant prostate cancers. The expression of ST3Gal II was constitutively activated in castration-resistant prostate cancer cell lines, PC3 and DU145, because of the hypomethylation of CpG island in its promoter. However, in androgen-depleted LNCap cells, a hormone-sensitive prostate cancer cell line, the expression of ST3Gal II was silenced because of the hypermethylation of the promoter region. The expression of ST3Gal II in LNCap cells increased with testosterone treatment because of the demethylation of the CpG sites. This testosterone-dependent ST3Gal II expression was suppressed by RelB siRNA, indicating that RelB activated ST3Gal II transcription in the testosterone-induced demethylated promoter. Therefore, in hormone-sensitive prostate cancers, the production of GD1a may be regulated by androgen. This is the first report indicating that the expression of a sialyltransferase is transcriptionally regulated by androgen-dependent demethylation of the CpG sites in its gene promoter

Regulation of RNA Splicing: Aberrant Splicing Regulation and Therapeutic Targets in Cancer

RNA splicing is a critical step in the maturation of precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) by removing introns and exons. The combination of inclusion and exclusion of introns and exons in pre-mRNA can generate vast diversity in mature mRNA from a limited number of genes. Cancer cells acquire cancer-specific mechanisms through aberrant splicing regulation to acquire resistance to treatment and to promote malignancy. Splicing regulation involves many factors, such as proteins, non-coding RNAs, and DNA sequences at many steps. Thus, the dysregulation of splicing is caused by many factors, including mutations in RNA splicing factors, aberrant expression levels of RNA splicing factors, small nuclear ribonucleoproteins biogenesis, mutations in snRNA, or genomic sequences that are involved in the regulation of splicing, such as 5’ and 3’ splice sites, branch point site, splicing enhancer/silencer, and changes in the chromatin status that affect the splicing profile. This review focuses on the dysregulation of RNA splicing related to cancer and the associated therapeutic methods

Regulation of RNA Splicing: Aberrant Splicing Regulation and Therapeutic Targets in Cancer

RNA splicing is a critical step in the maturation of precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) by removing introns and exons. The combination of inclusion and exclusion of introns and exons in pre-mRNA can generate vast diversity in mature mRNA from a limited number of genes. Cancer cells acquire cancer-specific mechanisms through aberrant splicing regulation to acquire resistance to treatment and to promote malignancy. Splicing regulation involves many factors, such as proteins, non-coding RNAs, and DNA sequences at many steps. Thus, the dysregulation of splicing is caused by many factors, including mutations in RNA splicing factors, aberrant expression levels of RNA splicing factors, small nuclear ribonucleoproteins biogenesis, mutations in snRNA, or genomic sequences that are involved in the regulation of splicing, such as 5’ and 3’ splice sites, branch point site, splicing enhancer/silencer, and changes in the chromatin status that affect the splicing profile. This review focuses on the dysregulation of RNA splicing related to cancer and the associated therapeutic methods.</jats:p

Evaluation of HPV16 E7 expression in head and neck carcinoma cell lines and clinical specimens

AbstractHuman papillomavirus (HPV) 16 infection in the oropharynx is one of the major risk factors for oropharyngeal carcinoma. Although the HPV E6 and E7 proteins are known to have a role in head and neck carcinogenesis, whether their expression is maintained once the tumour has developed still remains unclear. We evaluated the expression of these proteins in HPV16-positive cancer cell lines and clinical oropharyngeal specimens. Two out of the four commercially available antibodies directed against the E7 protein could detect the E7 protein overexpressed in the 293FT cells, human embryonic kidney cells, although none of the four commercially available anti-E6 antibodies could detect the overexpressed E6 protein. Whereas HPV16-positive head and neck or cervical carcinoma cell lines expressed the E7 mRNA, the antibodies with an ability to detect the E7 protein could not detect it in western blotting in these HPV16-positive cell lines. In clinical specimens, E7 protein was partially detected in p16-positive area in p16-positive and HPV16 DNA-positive samples, but not in p16-negative and HPV DNA-negative or p16-positive and HPV DNA-negative samples. Consistent with these findings, the E7 protein was poorly translated from the endogenous structure of the E7 mRNA, although significant E7 mRNA expression was detected in these samples. Our findings indicate that E7 protein is partially expressed in p16-positive area in p16-positive and HPV16 DNA-positive clinical specimens.</jats:p