Staphylococcal Pericarditis Causing Pericardial Tamponade and Concurrent Empyema

Bacterial pericarditis is a rare presentation and is usually due to secondary infection from a hematogenous cause or can occur secondary to trauma, intrathoracic surgery, or due to spread of infection from a contiguous focus via ligaments that anchor the pericardium to its surrounding structures. Its course is fulminant characterized by a high mortality rate from sepsis, tamponade, and constriction. We describe a rare case of Staphylococcus aureus pericarditis with concurrent unilateral empyema. The patient rapidly developed tamponade and was successfully treated with antibiotics and urgent percutaneous pericardial drainage with placement of a temporary catheter. Treatment for bacterial pericarditis typically is 4–6 weeks long. Thoracic surgery should be consulted as soon as possible to determine need for surgical intervention, as fibrin deposition may occur, making percutaneous drainage incomplete and leading to complications of persistent purulent pericarditis or constrictive pericarditis

Staphylococcal Pericarditis Causing Pericardial Tamponade and Concurrent Empyema

Bacterial pericarditis is a rare presentation and is usually due to secondary infection from a hematogenous cause or can occur secondary to trauma, intrathoracic surgery, or due to spread of infection from a contiguous focus via ligaments that anchor the pericardium to its surrounding structures. Its course is fulminant characterized by a high mortality rate from sepsis, tamponade, and constriction. We describe a rare case ofStaphylococcus aureuspericarditis with concurrent unilateral empyema. The patient rapidly developed tamponade and was successfully treated with antibiotics and urgent percutaneous pericardial drainage with placement of a temporary catheter. Treatment for bacterial pericarditis typically is 4–6 weeks long. Thoracic surgery should be consulted as soon as possible to determine need for surgical intervention, as fibrin deposition may occur, making percutaneous drainage incomplete and leading to complications of persistent purulent pericarditis or constrictive pericarditis.</jats:p

A Case of Pulmonary Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma with Literature Review

Pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare vascular tumor and infrequently described in medical literature as case reports and case series. Diagnosis is often incidental with high index of histopathological suspicion from clinical pathologist. The pathological pattern is quite unique with distinct immunohistochemical stains. Up to this day, there is no established standard treatment owing to the scarcity of this tumor. In this case report, we describe a case of pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma unexpectedly diagnosed with transthoracic needle biopsy, along with a review of the current literature.</jats:p

A Case of Pulmonary Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma with Literature Review

Pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare vascular tumor and infrequently described in medical literature as case reports and case series. Diagnosis is often incidental with high index of histopathological suspicion from clinical pathologist. The pathological pattern is quite unique with distinct immunohistochemical stains. Up to this day, there is no established standard treatment owing to the scarcity of this tumor. In this case report, we describe a case of pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma unexpectedly diagnosed with transthoracic needle biopsy, along with a review of the current literature

700. Risk Factors and Molecular Epidemiology of Acute and Chronic Norovirus Infection at a Large Tertiary Care Cancer Center

Abstract Background Norovirus (NoV) is the leading cause of viral diarrhea in patients with cancer. In this study, we describe risk factors associated with acute and chronic NoV infection in this patient population. Methods We identified 132 patients with NoV diarrhea (using stool RT PCR) between 2016-2020 at University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). Patient data, including demographics, clinical characteristics, NoV treatments, and complications were retrospectively extracted from charts. Stool samples were analyzed for NoV genogroups and genotypes. We compared characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute diarrhea (&amp;lt; 14day; AD) versus chronic diarrhea ( &amp;gt;14day or recurrences within 12 weeks; CD) and analyzed the data using Pearson Chi square or Fisher’s exact for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Results Of 132 patients identified, 124 had an underlying cancer (39 solid tumor, 85 hematological malignancies, Table 1). On univariate analysis, CD patients were more likely to have a hematological malignancy (p=0.002), be a hematopoietic stem cell recipient (p= 0.013), have a history of gastrointestinal graft versus host disease (p= 0.011), or have received immunosuppressants or steroids in the 90 days before diarrhea onset (p=0.001, Table 2). CD patients had significantly lower white blood cell counts (p=0.038), absolute neutrophil counts (p=0.049), IgG levels (p= 0.001), and serum albumin levels (p=0.002) at the time of NoV diagnosis (Table 3). Patients with CD more often received symptomatic or NoV targeting treatment, including anti-diarrheal (p=0.005), nitazoxanide (p&amp;lt; 0.001), intravenous immune globulin (p=0.017), and oral IgG (p=0.042). CD patients more often had diarrheal recurrence in the first 4 weeks (p=0.001) or the second month (p&amp;lt; 0.001) after initial diagnosis and needed enteral or parenteral nutrition (p=0.004). We genotyped NoV in 67 patients (Figure 1), resulting in identification of the following genogroups: GI (n=9, 13%), GII.4 (n=23, 34%), and other types of GII (n=35, 52%). Genotype diversity was higher in patients with CD than AD (Figure 1). Conclusion In patients with cancer, CD from NoV is associated with severe immunosuppression, is refractory to therapy and can be caused by a variety of NoV genotypes/genogroups. Disclosures Robert L. Atmar, MD, Takeda Vaccines, Inc. (Grant/Research Support) Mary Estes, PhD, Takeda Vaccines (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Pablo C. Okhuysen, MD, FACP, FIDSA, Deinove Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Consultant)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Merck &amp; Co. (Grant/Research Support)Napo Pharmaceuticals (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Singulex (Consultant)Summit Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support) </jats:sec

Inter-rater agreement of CAUTI (catheter-associated urinary tract infections) diagnosis among Infectious disease physicians

Background: CAUTIs constitute forty percent of nosocomial infections, yet their direct link with mortality remains debated. In 2009, NHSN estimated the economic burden of CAUTIs in the U.S. to be over $340 million. Limited data exist on inter-physician concordance in diagnosing CAUTIs, especially in patients with abnormal genitourinary (GU) anatomy. Our study assessed inter-provider variability in diagnosing CAUTI in 50 such patients, including those meeting NHSN(National healthcare safety network) criteria. Methods: We included a random set of 50 adults (18+) with abnormal GU anatomy admitted to the University of Miami hospitals from January 2018 to November 2021 who had a urinary foley catheter and at least one positive urine culture during their hospitalization. Three Infectious disease fellows and three board-certified Infectious disease physicians independently reviewed each patient’s chart, classifying them as having or not having a CAUTI. Inter-physician reliability was assessed using kappa statistics. Results: Our findings highlight substantial variation in clinician-determined CAUTI incidence among the 50 patients with abnormal GU anatomy, ranging from 8% to 32% (Figures 2,3). Inter-rater agreement on CAUTI diagnosis was generally poor (Kappa Hollenbeak CS, et al. The attributable cost of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the United States: A systematic review. Am J Infect Control. 2018 Jul;46(7):751-757. Trautner BW, et al. Development and validation of an algorithm to recalibrate mental models and reduce diagnostic errors associated with catheter-associated bacteriuria. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 15;13:48. Gafary M, et al. Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) in Bladder Cancer Patients Post Cystectomy With a Neobladder, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 2, Issue suppl_1, December 2015, 293

Norovirus in Cancer Patients: A Review

Abstract Norovirus (NoV) is the leading cause of viral-related diarrhea in cancer patients, in whom it can be chronic, contributing to decreased quality of life, interruption of cancer care, malnutrition, and altered mucosal barrier function. Immunosuppressed cancer patients shed NoV for longer periods of time than immunocompetent hosts, favoring quasispecies development and emergence of novel NoV variants. While nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for NoV diagnosis have revolutionized our understanding of NoV burden of disease, not all NAATs provide information on viral load or infecting genotype. There is currently no effective antiviral or vaccine for chronic NoV infections. Screening for inhibitors of NoV replication in intestinal organoid culture models and creation of NoV-specific adoptive T cells are promising new strategies to develop treatments for chronic NoV in immunosuppressed patients. Herein we summarize data on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic challenges, and treatment of NoV infection in patients with cancer.</jats:p

1098. Norovirus Infection in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Immunotherapy (CAR-T)

Abstract Background CAR-T is used to treat certain refractory hematological malignancies. B-cell aplasia and immunosuppression used to treat CAR-T side effects increase infection risk. Little data are available describing Norovirus (NoV) infections in CAR-T recipients. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 134 patients with NoV diarrhea (identified by nucleic acid amplification test) between 2016-2019. Of these patients, nine received CAR-T prior to developing NoV. Here we describe their demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and complications. Results The median age was 49 years (Table 1). Patients’ underlying malignancies included Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (4), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (3), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (1) and metastatic Sarcoma (1). Prior to development of NoV, six patients had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and 1 had received checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Five patients experienced cytokine release syndrome after CAR-T, and 1 experienced CAR-T-related encephalopathy syndrome (Table 2). Two patients received interleukin-6 antagonist therapy, and one received high dose steroids. Time to diarrhea onset post-CAR-T cell infusion was variable(median 256days, IQR 26-523 days).Six had an absolute lymphocyte count&amp;lt; 1000/mm3 at diarrhea onset. Three had diarrhea for &amp;gt;14 days; median diarrhea duration in the other 6 patients was 4 days. Other GI complaints included abdominal pain (3), nausea (4), and vomiting (3). For NoV treatment, three received oral immunoglobulin, and 8 received Nitazoxanide. Complications included development of concomitant GI-GVHD(5), ileus (2), need for TPN (3), renal failure requiring dialysis (2), ICU stay (3), and death (2). Two patients were co-infected with other enteropathogens such as rotavirus, enteropathogenic and enteroaggregative E.Coli and Clostridioides difficile. Three patients with diarrhea lasting &amp;gt;14 days had serial samples collected over time; NoV shedding lasted 81-546 days. NoV was genotyped in 6 patients(Table 3) and included GII.2(2), GII.4(2), GII.6(1) and GII.12(1). Table 1: Patient characteristics (N=9) Table 2: CAR-T related factors Table 3: NoV Genotypes Conclusion NoV belonging to various genotypes is an important cause of acute and chronic diarrhea in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy. Disclosures Adilene Olvera, MPH MLS (ASCP), MERK (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator) Robert L. Atmar, MD, Takeda Vaccines, Inc. (Grant/Research Support) Mary K. Estes, PhD, Takeda Vaccines (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) </jats:sec