951 research outputs found

    Sums of products of polynomials in few variables : lower bounds and polynomial identity testing

    Get PDF
    We study the complexity of representing polynomials as a sum of products of polynomials in few variables. More precisely, we study representations of the form P=i=1Tj=1dQijP = \sum_{i = 1}^T \prod_{j = 1}^d Q_{ij} such that each QijQ_{ij} is an arbitrary polynomial that depends on at most ss variables. We prove the following results. 1. Over fields of characteristic zero, for every constant μ\mu such that 0μ<10 \leq \mu < 1, we give an explicit family of polynomials {PN}\{P_{N}\}, where PNP_{N} is of degree nn in N=nO(1)N = n^{O(1)} variables, such that any representation of the above type for PNP_{N} with s=Nμs = N^{\mu} requires TdnΩ(n)Td \geq n^{\Omega(\sqrt{n})}. This strengthens a recent result of Kayal and Saha [KS14a] which showed similar lower bounds for the model of sums of products of linear forms in few variables. It is known that any asymptotic improvement in the exponent of the lower bounds (even for s=ns = \sqrt{n}) would separate VP and VNP[KS14a]. 2. We obtain a deterministic subexponential time blackbox polynomial identity testing (PIT) algorithm for circuits computed by the above model when TT and the individual degree of each variable in PP are at most logO(1)N\log^{O(1)} N and sNμs \leq N^{\mu} for any constant μ<1/2\mu < 1/2. We get quasipolynomial running time when s<logO(1)Ns < \log^{O(1)} N. The PIT algorithm is obtained by combining our lower bounds with the hardness-randomness tradeoffs developed in [DSY09, KI04]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first nontrivial PIT algorithm for this model (even for the case s=2s=2), and the first nontrivial PIT algorithm obtained from lower bounds for small depth circuits

    Phenomenology of two texture zero neutrino mass in left-right symmetric model with Z8×Z2Z_8 \times Z_2

    Full text link
    We have done a phenomenological study on the neutrino mass matrix MνM_\nu favoring two zero texture in the framework of left-right symmetric model (LRSM) where type I and type II seesaw naturally occurs. The type I seesaw mass term is considered to be following a trimaximal mixing (TM) pattern. The symmetry realizations of these texture zero structures has been realized using the discrete cyclic abelian Z8×Z2Z8\times Z2 group in LRSM. We have studied six of the popular texture zero classes named as A1, A2, B1, B2, B3 and B4 favoured by neutrino oscillation data in our analysis. We basically focused on the implications of these texture zero mass matrices in low energy phenomenon like neutrinoless double beta decay (NDBD) and lepton flavour violation (LFV) in LRSM scenario. For NDBD, we have considered only the dominant new physics contribution coming from the diagrams containing purely RH current and another from the charged Higgs scalar while ignoring the contributions coming from the left-right gauge boson mixing and heavy light neutrino mixing. The mass of the extra gauge bosons and scalars has been considered to be of the order of TeV scale which is accessible at the colliders.Comment: 33 pages, 21 figures, 10 table

    On the power of homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits

    Full text link
    We prove exponential lower bounds on the size of homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits computing an explicit polynomial in VPVP. Our results hold for the {\it Iterated Matrix Multiplication} polynomial - in particular we show that any homogeneous depth 4 circuit computing the (1,1)(1,1) entry in the product of nn generic matrices of dimension nO(1)n^{O(1)} must have size nΩ(n)n^{\Omega(\sqrt{n})}. Our results strengthen previous works in two significant ways. Our lower bounds hold for a polynomial in VPVP. Prior to our work, Kayal et al [KLSS14] proved an exponential lower bound for homogeneous depth 4 circuits (over fields of characteristic zero) computing a poly in VNPVNP. The best known lower bounds for a depth 4 homogeneous circuit computing a poly in VPVP was the bound of nΩ(logn)n^{\Omega(\log n)} by [LSS, KLSS14].Our exponential lower bounds also give the first exponential separation between general arithmetic circuits and homogeneous depth 4 arithmetic circuits. In particular they imply that the depth reduction results of Koiran [Koi12] and Tavenas [Tav13] are tight even for reductions to general homogeneous depth 4 circuits (without the restriction of bounded bottom fanin). Our lower bound holds over all fields. The lower bound of [KLSS14] worked only over fields of characteristic zero. Prior to our work, the best lower bound for homogeneous depth 4 circuits over fields of positive characteristic was nΩ(logn)n^{\Omega(\log n)} [LSS, KLSS14]

    Near-optimal Bootstrapping of Hitting Sets for Algebraic Models

    Full text link
    The classical lemma of Ore-DeMillo-Lipton-Schwartz-Zippel [Ore22,DL78,Zip79,Sch80] states that any nonzero polynomial f(x1,,xn)f(x_1,\ldots, x_n) of degree at most ss will evaluate to a nonzero value at some point on a grid SnFnS^n \subseteq \mathbb{F}^n with S>s|S| > s. Thus, there is an explicit hitting set for all nn-variate degree ss, size ss algebraic circuits of size (s+1)n(s+1)^n. In this paper, we prove the following results: - Let ϵ>0\epsilon > 0 be a constant. For a sufficiently large constant nn and all s>ns > n, if we have an explicit hitting set of size (s+1)nϵ(s+1)^{n-\epsilon} for the class of nn-variate degree ss polynomials that are computable by algebraic circuits of size ss, then for all ss, we have an explicit hitting set of size sexpexp(O(logs))s^{\exp \circ \exp (O(\log^\ast s))} for ss-variate circuits of degree ss and size ss. That is, if we can obtain a barely non-trivial exponent compared to the trivial (s+1)n(s+1)^{n} sized hitting set even for constant variate circuits, we can get an almost complete derandomization of PIT. - The above result holds when "circuits" are replaced by "formulas" or "algebraic branching programs". This extends a recent surprising result of Agrawal, Ghosh and Saxena [AGS18] who proved the same conclusion for the class of algebraic circuits, if the hypothesis provided a hitting set of size at most (sn0.5δ)(s^{n^{0.5 - \delta}}) (where δ>0\delta>0 is any constant). Hence, our work significantly weakens the hypothesis of Agrawal, Ghosh and Saxena to only require a slightly non-trivial saving over the trivial hitting set, and also presents the first such result for algebraic branching programs and formulas.Comment: The main result has been strengthened significantly, compared to the older version of the paper. Additionally, the stronger theorem now holds even for subclasses of algebraic circuits, such as algebraic formulas and algebraic branching program

    A Quadratic Lower Bound for Homogeneous Algebraic Branching Programs

    Get PDF
    An algebraic branching program (ABP) is a directed acyclic graph, with a start vertex s, and end vertex t and each edge having a weight which is an affine form in variables x_1, x_2, ..., x_n over an underlying field. An ABP computes a polynomial in a natural way, as the sum of weights of all paths from s to t, where the weight of a path is the product of the weights of the edges in the path. An ABP is said to be homogeneous if the polynomial computed at every vertex is homogeneous. In this paper, we show that any homogeneous algebraic branching program which computes the polynomial x_1^n + x_2^n + ... + x_n^n has at least Omega(n^2) vertices (and edges). To the best of our knowledge, this seems to be the first non-trivial super-linear lower bound on the number of vertices for a general homogeneous ABP and slightly improves the known lower bound of Omega(n log n) on the number of edges in a general (possibly non-homogeneous) ABP, which follows from the classical results of Strassen (1973) and Baur--Strassen (1983). On the way, we also get an alternate and unified proof of an Omega(n log n) lower bound on the size of a homogeneous arithmetic circuit (follows from [Strassen, 1973] and [Baur-Strassen, 1983]), and an n/2 lower bound (n over reals) on the determinantal complexity of an explicit polynomial [Mignon-Ressayre, 2004], [Cai, Chen, Li, 2010], [Yabe, 2015]. These are currently the best lower bounds known for these problems for any explicit polynomial, and were originally proved nearly two decades apart using seemingly different proof techniques

    Common Origin of Non-zero θ13\theta_{13} and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe in a TeV scale Seesaw Model with A4A_4 Flavour Symmetry

    Full text link
    We study the possibility of generating non-zero reactor mixing angle θ13\theta_{13} and baryon asymmetry of the Universe within the framework of an A4A_4 flavour symmetric model. Using the conventional type I seesaw mechanism we construct the Dirac and Majorana mass matrices which give rise to the correct light neutrino mass matrix. Keeping the right handed neutrino mass matrix structure trivial so that it gives rise to a (quasi) degenerate spectrum of heavy neutrinos suitable for resonant leptogenesis at TeV scale, we generate the non-trivial structure of Dirac neutrino mass matrix that can lead to the light neutrino mixing through type I seesaw formula. Interestingly, such a setup naturally leads to non-zero θ13\theta_{13} due to the existence of anti-symmetric contraction of the product of two triplet representations of A4A_4. Such antisymmetric part of triplet products usually vanish for right handed neutrino Majorana mass terms, leading to μτ\mu-\tau symmetric scenarios in the most economical setups. We constrain the model parameters from the requirement of producing the correct neutrino data as well as baryon asymmetry of the Universe for right handed neutrino mass scale around TeV. The A4A_4 symmetry is augmented by additional Z3×Z2Z_3 \times Z_2 symmetry to make sure that the splitting between right handed neutrinos required for resonant leptogenesis is generated only by next to leading order terms, making it naturally small. We find that the inverted hierarchical light neutrino masses give more allowed parameter space consistent with neutrino and baryon asymmetry data.Comment: 26 pages, 12 figures, 2 figures added, version accepted for publication in Phys. Rev.
    corecore