18 research outputs found
Direct Measurement of Perchlorate Exposure Biomarkers in a Highly Exposed Population: A Pilot Study
Exposure to perchlorate is ubiquitous in the United States and has been found to
be widespread in food and drinking water. People living in the lower Colorado
River region may have perchlorate exposure because of perchlorate in ground
water and locally-grown produce. Relatively high doses of perchlorate can
inhibit iodine uptake and impair thyroid function, and thus could impair
neurological development in utero. We examined human exposures to perchlorate in
the Imperial Valley among individuals consuming locally grown produce and
compared perchlorate exposure doses to state and federal reference doses. We
collected 24-hour urine specimen from a convenience sample of 31 individuals and
measured urinary excretion rates of perchlorate, thiocyanate, nitrate, and
iodide. In addition, drinking water and local produce were also sampled for
perchlorate. All but two of the water samples tested negative for perchlorate.
Perchlorate levels in 79 produce samples ranged from non-detect to 1816 ppb.
Estimated perchlorate doses ranged from 0.02 to 0.51 µg/kg of body
weight/day. Perchlorate dose increased with the number of servings of dairy
products consumed and with estimated perchlorate levels in produce consumed. The
geometric mean perchlorate dose was 70% higher than for the NHANES
reference population. Our sample of 31 Imperial Valley residents had higher
perchlorate dose levels compared with national reference ranges. Although none
of our exposure estimates exceeded the U. S. EPA reference dose, three
participants exceeded the acceptable daily dose as defined by bench mark dose
methods used by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment
Investigating the Effects of Basis Set on Metal–Metal and Metal–Ligand Bond Distances in Stable Transition Metal Carbonyls: Performance of Correlation Consistent Basis Sets with 35 Density Functionals
Density functional theory (DFT) is a widely used method for predicting equilibrium geometries of organometallic compounds involving transition metals, with a wide choice of functional and basis set combinations. A study of the role of basis set size in predicting the structural parameters can be insightful with respect to the effectiveness of using small basis sets to optimize larger molecular systems. For many organometallic systems, the metal–metal and metal–carbon distances are the most important structural features. In this study, we compare the equilibrium metal–ligand and metal–metal distances of six transition metal carbonyl compounds predicted by the Hood-Pitzer double-ζ polarization (DZP) basis set, against those predicted employing the standard correlation consistent cc-pVXZ (X = D,T,Q) basis sets, for 35 different DFT methods. The effects of systematically increasing the basis set size on the structural parameters are carefully investigated. The Mn–Mn bond distance in Mn2(CO)10 shows a greater dependence on basis set size compared to the other M–M bonds. However, the DZP predictions for re(Mn–Mn) are closer to experiment than those obtained with the much larger cc-pVQZ basis set. Our results show that, in general, DZP basis sets predict structural parameters with an accuracy comparable to the triple and quadruple-ζ basis sets. This finding is very significant, because the quadruple-ζ basis set for Mn2(CO)10 includes 1308 basis functions, while the equally effective double-ζ set (DZP) includes only 366 basis functions. Overall, the DZP M06-L method predicts structures that are very consistent with experiment
Investigating the Effects of Basis Set on Metal–Metal and Metal–Ligand Bond Distances in Stable Transition Metal Carbonyls: Performance of Correlation Consistent Basis Sets with 35 Density Functionals
Density
functional theory (DFT) is a widely used method for predicting equilibrium
geometries of organometallic compounds involving transition metals,
with a wide choice of functional and basis set combinations. A study
of the role of basis set size in predicting the structural parameters
can be insightful with respect to the effectiveness of using small
basis sets to optimize larger molecular systems. For many organometallic
systems, the metal–metal and metal–carbon distances
are the most important structural features. In this study, we compare
the equilibrium metal–ligand and metal–metal distances
of six transition metal carbonyl compounds predicted by the Hood-Pitzer
double-ζ polarization (DZP) basis set, against those predicted
employing the standard correlation consistent cc-pVXZ (X = D,T,Q)
basis sets, for 35 different DFT methods. The effects of systematically
increasing the basis set size on the structural parameters are carefully
investigated. The Mn–Mn bond distance in Mn<sub>2</sub>(CO)<sub>10</sub> shows a greater dependence on basis set size compared to
the other M–M bonds. However, the DZP predictions for r<sub><i>e</i></sub>(Mn–Mn) are closer to experiment than
those obtained with the much larger cc-pVQZ basis set. Our results
show that, in general, DZP basis sets predict structural parameters
with an accuracy comparable to the triple and quadruple-ζ basis
sets. This finding is very significant, because the quadruple-ζ
basis set for Mn<sub>2</sub>(CO)<sub>10</sub> includes 1308 basis
functions, while the equally effective double-ζ set (DZP) includes
only 366 basis functions. Overall, the DZP M06-L method predicts structures
that are very consistent with experiment
Public Health Department Response to Mercury Poisoning: The Importance of Biomarkers and Risks and Benefits Analysis for Chelation Therapy
Recommended from our members
