Entourage: the immune microenvironment following follicular lymphoma

In follicular lymphoma, nonmalignant immune cells are important. Follicular lymphoma depends on CD4+ cells, but CD8+ cells counteract it. We hypothesized that the presence of follicular lymphoma is associated with higher CD4+ than CD8+ cell numbers in the tumor microenvironment but not in the immune system. Using flow cytometry, pre-treatment and follow-up CD4/CD8 ratios were estimated in the bone marrow, blood and lymph nodes of untreated follicular lymphoma patients in two independent data sets (N1=121; N2=166). The ratios were analyzed for their relation with bone marrow lymphoma involvement. Bone marrows were also investigated with immunohistochemistry. In either data set, the bone marrow CD4/CD8 ratios were higher in bone marrows involved with lymphoma (P=0.043 and 0.0002, respectively). The mean CD4/CD8 ratio was 1.0 in uninvolved and 1.4 in involved bone marrows. Also higher in involved bone marrows were CD4/CD56 and CD3CD25/CD3 ratios. No blood or lymph node ratios differed between bone marrow-negative and -positive patients. Sequential samples showed increased bone marrow CD4/CD8 ratios in all cases of progression to bone marrow involvement. Immunohistochemistry showed CD4+, CD57+, programmed death-1+, forkhead box protein 3+ and CD21+ cells accumulated inside the lymphoma infiltrates, whereas CD8+, CD56+ and CD68+ cells were outside the infiltrates. This study provides evidence in vivo that the microenvironment changes upon follicular lymphoma involvement

Disrupted lymph node and splenic stroma in mice with induced inflammatory melanomas is associated with impaired recruitment of T and dendritic cells

International audienceMigration of dendritic cells (DC) from the tumor environment to the T cell cortex in tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN) is essential for priming naïve T lymphocytes (TL) to tumor antigen (Ag). We used a mouse model of induced melanoma in which similar oncogenic events generate two phenotypically distinct melanomas to study the influence of tumor-associated inflammation on secondary lymphoid organ (SLO) organization. One tumor promotes inflammatory cytokines, leading to mobilization of immature myeloid cells (iMC) to the tumor and SLO; the other does not. We report that inflammatory tumors induced alterations of the stromal cell network of SLO, profoundly altering the distribution of TL and the capacity of skin-derived DC and TL to migrate or home to TDLN. These defects, which did not require tumor invasion, correlated with loss of fibroblastic reticular cells in T cell zones and in impaired production of CCL21. Infiltrating iMC accumulated in the TDLN medulla and the splenic red pulp. We propose that impaired function of the stromal cell network during chronic inflammation induced by some tumors renders spleens non-receptive to TL and TDLN non-receptive to TL and migratory DC, while the entry of iMC into these perturbed SLO is enhanced. This could constitute a mechanism by which inflammatory tumors escape immune control. If our results apply to inflammatory tumors in general, the demonstration that SLO are poorly receptive to CCR7-dependent migration of skin-derived DC and naïve TL may constitute an obstacle for proposed vaccination or adoptive TL therapies of their hosts

FcγRIIb Inhibits Allergic Lung Inflammation in a Murine Model of Allergic Asthma

Allergic asthma is characterized by airway eosinophilia, increased mucin production and allergen-specific IgE. Fc gamma receptor IIb (FcγRIIb), an inhibitory IgG receptor, has recently emerged as a negative regulator of allergic diseases like anaphylaxis and allergic rhinitis. However, no studies to date have evaluated its role in allergic asthma. Our main objective was to study the role of FcγRIIb in allergic lung inflammation. We used a murine model of allergic airway inflammation. Inflammation was quantified by BAL inflammatory cells and airway mucin production. FcγRIIb expression was measured by qPCR and flow cytometry and the cytokines were quantified by ELISA. Compared to wild type animals, FcγRIIb deficient mice mount a vigorous allergic lung inflammation characterized by increased bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cellularity, eosinophilia and mucin content upon ragweed extract (RWE) challenge. RWE challenge in sensitized mice upregulated FcγRIIb in the lungs. Disruption of IFN-γ gene abrogated this upregulation. Treatment of naïve mice with the Th1-inducing agent CpG DNA increased FcγRIIb expression in the lungs. Furthermore, treatment of sensitized mice with CpG DNA prior to RWE challenge induced greater upregulation of FcγRIIb than RWE challenge alone. These observations indicated that RWE challenge upregulated FcγRIIb in the lungs by IFN-γ- and Th1-dependent mechanisms. RWE challenge upregulated FcγRIIb on pulmonary CD14+/MHC II+ mononuclear cells and CD11c+ cells. FcγRIIb deficient mice also exhibited an exaggerated RWE-specific IgE response upon sensitization when compared to wild type mice. We propose that FcγRIIb physiologically regulates allergic airway inflammation by two mechanisms: 1) allergen challenge mediates upregulation of FcγRIIb on pulmonary CD14+/MHC II+ mononuclear cells and CD11c+ cells by an IFN-γ dependent mechanism; and 2) by attenuating the allergen specific IgE response during sensitization. Thus, stimulating FcγRIIb may be a therapeutic strategy in allergic airway disorders

Impaired immunological synapse in sperm associated antigen 6 (SPAG6) deficient mice

This work is supported by grant RO1AI18697 from NIAID/NIH, American Asthma Foundation 11-0094 AAF, VCU School of Medicine Bridge grant, NIH HD076257, and VCU Massey Cancer Award. Flow cytometry is supported by the Massey Cancer Center Core P30 CA16059. Microscopy was performed at the VCU Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy Facility, supported in part with funding from NIH-NINDS center core grant 5P30N5S047463

Abstract 545: PLacental eXpanded (PLX) Cell Treatment Ameliorates Preeclampsia Induced by TLR3 or TLR7 Activation in Mice

PLacental eXpanded (PLX) cells (Pluristem Therapeutics Inc.) are human placenta-derived, mesenchymal-like adherent stromal cells that release proteins in response to the environment of the host. PLX cells are non-immunogenic and have been shown to decrease inflammation and increase angiogenesis in inflammatory and ischemic conditions. Therefore, we tested whether PLX cell treatment could attenuate symptoms of preeclampsia (PE) in mice. We hypothesized that one-time PLX cell treatment would decrease the pregnancy-dependent hypertension, proteinuria, endothelial dysfunction, splenomegaly, inflammation, and placental injury induced by Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation during pregnancy. Pregnant C57BL/6 mice were given ip injections of saline vehicle (P), the TLR3 agonist poly I:C (PPIC), or the TLR7 agonist R837 (PR) on days 13, 15, and 17 of gestation. P, PPIC, and PR mice were also given either plasmalyte A (PLA, vehicle) or PLX cells (1 million) by im injection in the right leg on gestational day 14 (n=8 in each group). PLX cell treatment progressively decreased SBP over 3 days in PPIC and PR mice and had no effect in P control mice (day 17 SBP in mmHg: P+PLA = 100±4, P+PLX = 96±4, PPIC+PLA = 144±3, PPIC+PLX = 111±1, PR+PLA = 145±2, PR+PLX = 106±3; PPIC+PLA and PR+PLA p&lt;0.05 vs. P+PLA). PLX cell treatment also normalized the urinary protein/creatinine ratio and aortic endothelium-dependent relaxation responses in PPIC and PR mice to that of P mice while having no significant effects on the number of fetuses or incidence of fetal demise per litter. Inflammation plays a central role in the development of TLR-induced PE and PLX cell treatment reduced spleen weight/body weight ratios, normalized splenic levels of gamma-delta T cells, decreased plasma IL-6 levels, and restored plasma IL-4 levels in PPIC and PR mice. Additionally, PLX cell treatment reduced fibrin deposition in the placental vasculature and significantly reduced placental HIF-1alpha protein levels. These data demonstrate that one-time PLX cell treatment after PE is induced was able to decrease inflammation, proteinuric hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and placental injury in mice and may be beneficial in women with PE.</jats:p

Durable Remissions and Increased Overall Survival in AML Patients Deemed Unfit for Standard Intensive Chemotherapy Achieved with High-Dose BST-236 (Aspacytarabine) Induction and Consolidation

Introduction: BST-236 (aspacytarabine), a novel pyrimidine antagonist, is a cytarabine prodrug designed to deliver high cytarabine doses with reduced systemic toxicity. BST-236 pharmacokinetics and metabolism reduce peak systemic exposure to free cytarabine and enable intensive treatment to patients otherwise unfit for intensive therapy. An open label phase 2b study, following a completed phase 1/2a dose escalation study, is ongoing. Enrolled are newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unfit for standard therapy, including patients with treatment-related AML or AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with prior exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMA). Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BST-236 induction and consolidation in AML patients unfit for standard induction therapy. Methods: BST-236, at a dose of 4.5 g/m2/d (containing 3 g/m2/d of cytarabine), is evaluated as a first-line induction and consolidation therapy in newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapy. Patients with secondary AML, previously treated with HMA, as well as patients with therapy-related AML, are eligible. Each BST-236 induction and consolidation course consists of 6 daily 1-hour intravenous infusions. Results: To date, in the phase 1/2 and phase 2 studies, 42 AML patients were treated with BST-236, of whom 20 newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard chemotherapy (median age 73 years) completed 1-4 courses of 4.5 g/m2/d BST-236. Of these, 40% had de novo AML and 60% had secondary AML. Thirty percent of patients were previously treated with HMA for MDS (median 10 courses), and 10% received prior chemo- or radiotherapy. The median baseline bone marrow blast percentage was 38 (range 13-94), and 35% and 53% of patients had intermediate or adverse European LeukemiaNet (ELN) score, respectively. BST-236 is safe and well-tolerated in repeated-course administration. Grade &amp;gt;2 adverse events include mainly hematological events and infections, with no other drug-related typical high-dose cytarabine events such as severe mucositis or cerebellar toxicity. Related serious adverse events include only cytopenia and pneumonia. The 30-day mortality rate is 7%. The complete remission (CR) rate in the evaluable patients to date who received 4.5 g/m2/d BST-236 is 50% in the de novo patients, 20% in secondary AML patients, and 20% in patients with prior HMA treatment. Forty-three percent of patients with adverse cytogenetics attained a CR, including 1 of 3 patients with a TP53 mutation. The median number of courses for reaching a CR is 1, and notably, all patients with bone marrow remission achieved complete hematological recovery within 36 days. BST-236 consolidation was well-tolerated and did not result in increased toxicity, enabling full count recovery. While none of the patients have undergone stem cell transplant, considered ineligible by the treating investigator, responses to BST-236 were durable and median overall survival (OS) for responders is not reached at 23 months (Figure 1A). Median OS for secondary AML patients was 6.8 months, and not reached for the de novo AML patients (Figure 1B). Follow up is ongoing with additional patients enrolling on study; updated analysis of response, minimal residual disease (MRD), duration of response, and OS will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The cumulative clinical data suggest that BST-236 as a single agent treatment is a safe and efficacious induction and consolidation therapy for patients who are unfit for standard intensive chemotherapy, including patients with adverse cytogenetics and prior exposure to HMA. The data may establish BST-236 as a new intensive therapy backbone of AML and may, for the first time, allow older adults deemed unfit for standard intensive induction and consolidation therapy, to benefit from an intensive treatment. Disclosures Altman: Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Syros: Consultancy; Theradex: Other: Advisory Board; Agios: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Other: Data safety and monitoring committee; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board - no payment but was reimbursed for travel; Kura Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board - no payment accepted, Research Funding; BioSight: Other: No payment but was reimbursed for travel , Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Fujifilm: Research Funding; Kartos: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Amphivena: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Immune Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ASH: Consultancy; Cancer Expert Now: Consultancy; PeerView: Consultancy; Astellas: Other: Advisory Board, Speaker (no payment), Steering Committee (no payment), Research Funding; PrIME Oncology: Consultancy; France Foundation: Consultancy. Luger:Ariad: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Acceleron: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Honoraria. Koprivnikar:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Kota:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical, Company Ltd, Cambridge, MA, USA: Honoraria; Xcenda: Honoraria. Emadi:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; NewLink Genetics: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KinaRx: Other: co-founder and scientific advisor. Bhatnagar:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KaryoPharm Therapuetics: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bixby:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Burch:Janssen: Other: paid speaker. Wolach:Amgen: Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Fees for lectures and Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Levi:Abbvie Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Flaishon:BioSight Ltd.: Current Employment. Tessler:BioSight Ltd.: Current Employment. Gengrinovitch:BioSight Ltd.: Current Employment. Ben Yakar:BioSight Ltd.: Current Employment. Rowe:Pluristem ltd: Consultancy. </jats:sec

Aspacytarabine (BST-236) Is Safe and Efficacious As a Single-Agent, First-Line Therapy for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Unfit for Standard Chemotherapy. Integrated Results from a Phase 1/2a and an Ongoing Phase 2b

Introduction: Aspacytarabine (BST-236) is a prodrug of cytarabine, a backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy. Due to its unique pharmacokinetics and metabolism, treatment with aspacytarabine evades peak exposure to free cytarabine, which reduces non-hematological toxicity and enables delivery of high-dose cytarabine also to patients unfit for standard therapy. Data from a completed phase 1/2a and an ongoing phase 2b studies in AML patients unfit for standard therapy, including patients with AML secondary to therapy and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with prior exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMA), demonstrate promising single-agent efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a potential first-line AML treatment for this challenging population. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine in AML patients unfit for standard induction therapy. Methods: A completed phase 1/2a study and an ongoing phase 2b study evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a single-agent therapeutic for AML. The phase 1/2a, dose-escalation study enrolled newly-diagnosed patients unfit for standard therapy and patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Patients were treated with 0.3-6 g/m2/d aspacytarabine in 6 dose-escalating cohorts. The ongoing multi-center phase 2b study expands the subgroup of newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard therapy, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a first-line therapy for this population. Secondary AML patients, treated with HMA, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy for a prior condition, are allowed. Patients in the phase 2b study are treated with the selected aspacytarabine dose of 4.5 g/m2/d, containing approximately 3 g/m2/d of cytarabine. Each aspacytarabine treatment course (induction and consolidation) consists of 6 1-hour daily intravenous infusions. Results: To date, 34 AML patients, median age 76 years, received at least 1 dose of aspacytarabine, including 30 patients unfit for standard induction therapy due to age or comorbidities. Overall, 25 patients completed 1 course of aspacytarabine, 4 patients completed 2 courses, 1 patient completed 3 courses, and 1 patient completed 4 courses of aspacytarabine. Three patients (in the phase 1/2a study) did not complete the first course. Aspacytarabine was safe and well-tolerated in repeated-course administration, including in older and unfit patients. Adverse events included mainly hematological "on-target" events with no drug-related mucositis or cerebellar toxicity. Twenty-one patients were newly-diagnosed with AML, either de novo or secondary to MDS or therapy. The patient population was characterized by older age (median 76 years, range 67-88 years), and the majority (67%) of patients had secondary AML, including 10 patients (48%) who were previously treated with HMA (median of 10 courses) or radiotherapy. The median baseline bone marrow blast percentage of this population was 75, and 43% and 48% had intermediate or adverse European LeukemiaNet (ELN) cytogenetic score, respectively. Despite these poor-prognostic characteristics, the 30-day mortality rate in the group of patients receiving ≥4.5 g/m2/d aspacytarabine was 7%. The combined complete remission (CR) rate of all doses was 33%, including 1 patient reaching a CR with partial platelet recovery (CRp). The CR rate in patients treated with at least 4.5 g/m2/d aspacytarabine is 36%, with median time for complete hematological recovery of 27 days (range 21-30) following induction and consolidation. Notably, among the 7 patients who reached a CR/CRp (median age 77), 3 secondary AML patients reached a CR, including 2 patients with prior exposure to HMA (5 and 10 courses) and 1 with prior exposure to radiotherapy (Table 1). Duration of response and overall survival follow up is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The accumulating clinical data suggest that aspacytarabine is safe and efficacious for the treatment of AML patients who are unfit for standard induction therapy, including patients with prior exposure to HMA, which may establish aspacytarabine as a new therapeutic backbone for AML, either as a single agent or in combination with targeted therapy. Disclosures Altman: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biosight: Other: US Lead; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer Expert Now: Consultancy; France Foundation: Speakers Bureau; prIME Oncology: Speakers Bureau; PeerView: Speakers Bureau; Theradex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Luger:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Onconova: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Genetech: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Cyslacel: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria. Kota:Takeda: Honoraria; Xcenda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Flaishon:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Tessler:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Gengrinovitch:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Ben Yakar:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Rowe:BioSight: Consultancy. </jats:sec