Severity of Diabetes Mellitus and Total Hip or Knee Replacement: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Contains fulltext : 171491.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)It is generally thought that people with diabetes mellitus (DM) are more likely to suffer from osteoarthritis (OA) due to an increased body mass index (BMI), resulting in mechanical destruction of cartilage. However, previous studies have suggested a coexisting metabolic causality.To evaluate the risk of hip or knee replacement, as a proxy for severe OA, in patients with DM. We additionally evaluated the risk of total joint replacement (TJR) with various proxies for increased DM severity.A population-based case-control study was performed, using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Cases (n = 94,609) were defined as patients >18 years who had undergone TJR between 2000 and 2012. Controls were matched by age, gender, and general practice. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of total knee (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) surgery associated with use of antidiabetic drugs (ADs). We additionally stratified current AD users by proxies for DM severity.Current AD use was significantly associated with a lower risk of TKR (OR = 0.86 (95% CI = 0.78-0.94)) and THR (OR = 0.90 (95% CI = 0.82-0.99)) compared to patients not using ADs. Moreover, risk of TKR and THR was decreased with increasing HbA1c.This study does not support the theory that DM patients are more likely to suffer from severe OA as compared to patients without diabetes. Moreover, risk of severe OA necessitating TJR decreases with increasing DM severity. This is possibly due to dissimilarities in methodology, a decrease in eligibility for surgery, or variability of OA phenotypes

Are people following hip and knee arthroplasty at greater risk of experiencing a fall and fracture? Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Introduction: Falls are a major challenge for older people and are a significant source of mortality and morbidity. There has been uncertainty as to whether people with total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty have a greater risk of falls and associated fractures. This analysis was to explore this question with a large community dataset. Materials and Methods: Data from all people enrolled onto the US Osteoarthritis Initiative programme who had undergone a THA (n=104) or TKA (n=165), within a 12 month period, were compared to those who had not undergone an arthroplasty (n=4631). Data was collected on: the number of participants who reported a fall within a 12 month period; the frequency of falls in this period; and whether a fracture was sustained during this period. Odd ratios were calculated for the probability of experiencing a fall or fracture between the groups. Results: There was no statistical difference in falls between people following THA (OR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.41) or TKA (OR: 0.95; 0.67 to 1.35) compared to a non-arthroplasty cohort. Whilst there was no statistical difference in fracture risk between people following TKA compared to non-arthroplasty individuals (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.57 to 2.70), those who underwent THA had a 65% lower chance of experiencing a fracture in the initial 12 post-operative months compared to the non-THA cohort (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.65; p<0.01). Conclusions: There appears a lower chance of experiencing a fracture for people following THA compared to those who have not

Busulfan exposure associated with event-free survival in children after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

Busulfan exposure associated with event-free survival in children after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective multicenter cohort study OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between busulfan cumulative area under the curve (AUC] and event-free survival lEFS] in children undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT). DESIGN Retrospective, multicenter cohort study. METHODS Children who underwent alloHCT in 15 different centres worldwide were included in this study (2000-20131. Participants had to be on intravenous busulfan and pharmacokinetic samples had to be available. Exposure of interest was the cumulative AUC of busulfan, and primary outcome was EFS (time to graft failure, relapse or all-cause mortality). Cox regression models were used to derive relative risks (RR), and the optimal busulfan AUC level was estimated using propensity adjusted Weibull models. RESULTS A total of 674 subjects (41[%] malignant, 59[%] non- malignant) with a median age of 4.5 years (interquartile range 1.4-10.7 years) were included in the analysis. We observed a significant U-shaped relationship between busulfan cumulative AUC and EFS (P = 0.011). The optimal target was estimated at 90 mgh/L (78-101 mgh/L), and was independent of any of the investigated patient characteristics. An AUC below the target increased the risk of graft failure and relapse (relative risk 1.75, P = 0.004), while transplant-related mortality was more pronounced when the AUC was too high (relative risk 2.99, P &lt;0.0011. CONCLUSION This is the largest study on the relationship between busulfan and clinical outcomes in children undergoing alloHCT. Our results strongly advocate the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan, using 90 mg-h/L (78-101 mg h/L) as a target

Within-episode repeat antibiotic prescriptions in patients with respiratory tract infections: a population-based cohort study

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship interventions mainly focus on initial antibiotic prescriptions, with few considering within-episode repeat prescriptions. We aimed to describe the magnitude, type and determinants of within-episode repeat antibiotic prescriptions in patients presenting to primary care with respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study among 530 sampled English general practices within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). All individuals with a primary care RTI consultation for which an antibiotic was prescribed between March 2018 and February 2022. Main outcome measurement was repeat antibiotic prescriptions within 28 days of a RTI visit stratified by age (children vs. adults) and RTI type (lower vs. upper RTI). Multivariable logistic regression and principal components analyses were used to identify risk factors and patient clusters at risk for within-episode repeat prescriptions. Findings: 905,964 RTI episodes with at least one antibiotic prescription were identified. In adults, 19.9% (95% CI 19.3–20.5%) had at least one within-episode repeat prescription for a lower RTI, compared to 10.5% (95% CI 10.3–10.8%) for an upper RTI. In children, this was around 10% irrespective of RTI type. The majority of repeat prescriptions occurred a median of 10 days after the initial prescription and was the same antibiotic class in 48.3% of cases. Frequent RTI related GP visits and prior within-RTI-episode repeat antibiotic prescriptions were main factors associated with repeat prescriptions in both adults and children irrespective of RTI type. Young (<2 years) and older (65+) age were associated with repeat prescriptions. Among those aged 2–64 years, allergic rhinitis, COPD and oral corticosteroids were associated with repeat prescriptions. Interpretations: Repeat within-episode antibiotic use accounts for a significant proportion of all antibiotics prescribed for RTIs, with same class antibiotics unlikely to confer clinical benefit and is therefore a prime target for future antimicrobial stewardship interventions

Severity of Diabetes Mellitus and Total Hip or Knee Replacement

Permissions RESEARCH ARTICLE: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY Severity of Diabetes Mellitus and Total Hip or Knee Replacement A Population-Based Case–Control Study Nielen, Johannes T.H. MSc; Emans, Pieter J. PhD; Dagnelie, Pieter C. PhD; Boonen, Annelies PhD; Lalmohamed, Arief PhD; de Boer, Anthonius PhD; van den Bemt, Bart J.F. PhD; de Vries, Frank PhD Editor(s): Roever., Leonardo Author Information Medicine 95(20):p e3739, May 2016. | DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003739 OPEN SDC Metrics Abstract It is generally thought that people with diabetes mellitus (DM) are more likely to suffer from osteoarthritis (OA) due to an increased body mass index (BMI), resulting in mechanical destruction of cartilage. However, previous studies have suggested a coexisting metabolic causality. To evaluate the risk of hip or knee replacement, as a proxy for severe OA, in patients with DM. We additionally evaluated the risk of total joint replacement (TJR) with various proxies for increased DM severity. A population-based case–control study was performed, using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Cases (n = 94,609) were defined as patients >18 years who had undergone TJR between 2000 and 2012. Controls were matched by age, gender, and general practice. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of total knee (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) surgery associated with use of antidiabetic drugs (ADs). We additionally stratified current AD users by proxies for DM severity. Current AD use was significantly associated with a lower risk of TKR (OR = 0.86 (95% CI = 0.78–0.94)) and THR (OR = 0.90 (95% CI = 0.82–0.99)) compared to patients not using ADs. Moreover, risk of TKR and THR was decreased with increasing HbA1c. This study does not support the theory that DM patients are more likely to suffer from severe OA as compared to patients without diabetes. Moreover, risk of severe OA necessitating TJR decreases with increasing DM severity. This is possibly due to dissimilarities in methodology, a decrease in eligibility for surgery, or variability of OA phenotypes

Use of glitazones and the risk of elective HIP or knee replacement: A population based case-control study

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common musculoskeletal condition in the elderly population. However, to date, no disease modifying drug exists for this disease. In vivo studies have shown that glitazones may be used as anti-arthritic drugs. (Kobayashi, 2005; Boileau, 2007). Objectives: To determine the risk of total joint replacement (TJR) with the use of glitazones. Methods: A population based case-control study was performed using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Cases (n=94,609) were defined as patients >18 years of age who had undergone TJR surgery between 2000 and 2012. Controls were matched by age, gender and general practice. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of total knee (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) associated with use of glitazones. We additionally evaluated risk of TJR in current glitazone users compared to DM patients using other antidiabetic drugs (ADs). In order to determine a dose effect relationship, we also stratified glitazone users by total number of prescriptions prior to surgery. Results: There is no difference in risk of TKR (OR=1.11 (95% CI=0.95-1.29)) or THR (OR=0.87 (95% CI=0.74-1.02)) between glitazone users and patients not using glitazones. Furthermore, there is no difference in risk of TKR (OR=1.03 (95% CI=0.88-1.22)) and THR (OR=0.90 (95% CI=0.75-1.08)) when glitazones users are compared to other AD users. Finally, we did not find a dose response effect with increasing number of prescriptions. Conclusions: This study did not find any evidence for an anti-arthritic effect of glitazones

A Population Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate Doxorubicin Exposure Across All Age Groups

Background: The effect of age on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics remains inconclusive, especially in patients at the extremes of the age spectrum. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model to further investigate the impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. Methods: A three-compartment model, incorporating allometric scaling was developed to describe doxorubicin pharmacokinetics across all ages. First, the effect of age in young patients was investigated, by adding a maturation function on clearance (CL), the central compartment (V1) and peripheral compartments (V2 and V3). Second, the impact of ageing was investigated by adding a maximal effect (E max) function on CL, V1, V2, and V3. To investigate the overall impact of age on doxorubicin exposure, various simulations were conducted. Results: A total of 168 patients (age: 0.11–90 years) with 555 doxorubicin samples were included. The maturation function was relevant for V1 and V2 (13.1 and 23.7 L, respectively), leading to an increase in V1 and V2 with increasing age. In contrast, adding an E max function only impacted V3 (1063L), resulting in a decrease of V3 with age. Simulations showed no clinically relevant difference in the exposure of doxorubicin between age groups. Conclusion: A population pharmacokinetic model with data across the age range showed that age predominantly affected volumes of distribution of the central and peripheral compartments. These effects were not considered to be clinically relevant based on performed simulations. This supports the use of currently used doxorubicin dosages of 1 mg/kg for infants and toddlers &lt; 10 kg and body surface area-based dosing for other patients.</p

Melting of 2D liquid crystal colloidal structure

Using video microscopy, we investigated melting of a two-dimensional colloidal system, formed by glycerol droplets at the free surface of a nematic liquid crystalline layer. Analyzing different structure correlation functions, we conclude that melting occurs through an intermediate hexatic phase, as predicted by the Kosterlitz-Thouless-Halperin-Nelson-Young(KTHNY) theory. However, the temperature range of the intermediate phase is rather narrow, <1°C, and the characteristic critical power law decays of the correlation functions are not fully developed. We conclude that the melting of our 2D systems qualitatively occurs according to KTHNY, although quantitative details of the transition scenario may partly depend on the details of interparticle interaction

The risk of delirium after sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care unit patients

AIM: Knowledge of risk factors may provide strategies to reduce the high burden of delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We aimed to compare the risk of delirium after deep sedation with propofol versus midazolam in ICU patients. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, ICU patients who were in an unarousable state for ≥24 h due to continuous sedation with propofol and/or midazolam were included. Patients admitted ≤24 h, those with an acute neurological disorder and those receiving palliative sedation were excluded. ICU patients were assessed daily for delirium during the 7 days following an unarousable state due to continuous sedation. RESULTS: Among 950 included patients, 605 (64%) subjects were delirious during the 7 days after awaking. The proportion of subsequent delirium was higher after midazolam sedation (152/207 [73%] patients) and after both propofol and midazolam sedation (257/377 [68%] patients), compared to propofol sedation only (196/366 [54%] patients). Midazolam sedation (adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio [adj. cause-specific HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.66) and propofol and midazolam sedation (adj. cause-specific HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06-1.56) were associated with a higher risk of subsequent delirium compared to propofol sedation only. CONCLUSION: This study among sedated ICU patients suggests that, compared to propofol sedation, midazolam sedation is associated with a higher risk of subsequent delirium. This risk seems more apparent in patients with high cumulative midazolam intravenous doses. Our findings underpin the recommendations of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (rehabilitation/mobilization), and Sleep (disruption) guidelines to use propofol over benzodiazepines for sedation in ICU patients