Elimination of QCD renormalization scale and scheme ambiguities

We present results for the thrust distribution in the electron positron annihilation to the three jet process at NNLO in the perturbative conformal window of QCD, as a function of the number of flavors $N_f$. Given the existence of an infrared interacting fixed point in this region, we can compare the Conventional Scale Setting (CSS) and the Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC$_\infty$) methods along the entire renormalization group flow from the highest energies to zero energy. We then consider also the QED thrust, obtained as the limit $N_c \rightarrow 0$ of the number of colors and we show analogous comparison. QED in the low energy regime develops an infrared non-interacting fixed point. Using these quantum field theory limits as theoretical laboratories, we arrive at interesting results showing new features of the PMC$_\infty$

High precision tests of QCD without scale or scheme ambiguities

A key issue in making precise predictions in QCD is the uncertainty in setting the renormalization scale $\mu_R$ and thus determining the correct values of the QCD running coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_R^2)$ at each order in the perturbative expansion of a QCD observable. It has often been conventional to simply set the renormalization scale to the typical scale of the process $Q$ and vary it in the range $\mu_R \in [Q/2,2Q]$ in order to estimate the theoretical error. This is the practice of Conventional Scale Setting (CSS). The resulting CSS prediction will however depend on the theorist's choice of renormalization scheme and the resulting pQCD series will diverge factorially. It will also disagree with renormalization scale setting used in QED and electroweak theory thus precluding grand unification. A solution to the renormalization scale-setting problem is offered by the Principle of Maximum Conformality (PMC), which provides a systematic way to eliminate the renormalization scale-and-scheme dependence in perturbative calculations. The PMC method has rigorous theoretical foundations, it satisfies Renormalization Group Invariance (RGI) and preserves all self-consistency conditions derived from the renormalization group. The PMC cancels the renormalon growth, reduces to the Gell-Mann--Low scheme in the $N_C\to 0$ Abelian limit and leads to scale- and scheme-invariant results. The PMC has now been successfully applied to many high-energy processes. In this article we summarize recent developments and results in solving the renormalization scale and scheme ambiguities in perturbative QCD. [full abstract is in the paper].Comment: 79 pages ; 21 figures; Review article submitted to Prog. Part. Nucl. Phy

Comment on P.M. Stevenson, "`Maximal conformality' does not work", Phys. Lett. B 847 (2023) 138288

In his recently published article [1], P.M. Stevenson has claimed that the "principle of maximum conformality (PMC) is ineffective and does nothing to resolve the renormalization-scheme-dependence problem", concluding that the successes of PMC predictions is due to the fact that the PMC is a "laborious, ad hoc, back-door" version of the principle of minimum sensitivity (PMS). We point out that these conclusions are incorrect, being drawn from a misunderstanding of the PMC and the overestimation of the PMS. The purpose of the PMC is to achieve precise fixed-order pQCD predictions, free from conventional renormalization-scheme and -scale ambiguities. We have demonstrated that the PMC predictions satisfy all the self-consistency conditions of the renormalization group and standard renormalization-group invariance; the PMC prediction is thus independent of any initial choice of renormalization scheme and scale. Such scheme independence is also ensured by the commensurate scale relations among different observables. In the $N_C\to 0$ Abelian limit the PMC method reduces to the well-known Gell-Mann--Low method for precision calculations in Abelian QED. Owing to the elimination of the factorially divergent renormalon terms, the PMC series generally has better convergence behavior than the conventional series, can substantially suppress any residual scale dependence due to unknown higher-order terms, and thus provides a reliable basis for estimating the contributions of the unknown higher-order terms. The full Abstract and detailed explanations are given in the body of the text.Comment: 5 pages, no figure

Setting the Renormalization Scale in QCD: The Principle of Maximum Conformality

A key problem in making precise perturbative QCD predictions is the uncertainty in determining the renormalization scale $\mu$ of the running coupling $\alpha_s(\mu^2).$ The purpose of the running coupling in any gauge theory is to sum all terms involving the $\beta$ function; in fact, when the renormalization scale is set properly, all non-conformal $\beta \ne 0$ terms in a perturbative expansion arising from renormalization are summed into the running coupling. The remaining terms in the perturbative series are then identical to that of a conformal theory; i.e., the corresponding theory with $\beta=0$. The resulting scale-fixed predictions using the "principle of maximum conformality" (PMC) are independent of the choice of renormalization scheme -- a key requirement of renormalization group invariance. The results avoid renormalon resummation and agree with QED scale-setting in the Abelian limit. The PMC is also the theoretical principle underlying the BLM procedure, commensurate scale relations between observables, and the scale-setting method used in lattice gauge theory. The number of active flavors $n_f$ in the QCD $\beta$ function is also correctly determined. We discuss several methods for determining the PMC scale for QCD processes. We show that a single global PMC scale, valid at leading order, can be derived from basic properties of the perturbative QCD cross section. The elimination of the renormalization scale ambiguity and the scheme dependence using the PMC will not only increase the precision of QCD tests, but it will also increase the sensitivity of collider experiments to new physics beyond the Standard Model.Comment: 13 pages,2 figure

Detailed Comparison of Renormalization Scale-Setting Procedures based on the Principle of Maximum Conformality

The {\it Principle of Maximum Conformality} (PMC), which generalizes the conventional Gell-Mann-Low method for scale-setting in perturbative QED to non-Abelian QCD, provides a rigorous method for achieving unambiguous scheme-independent, fixed-order predictions for physical observables consistent with the principles of the renormalization group. In addition to the original multi-scale-setting approach (PMCm), two variations of the PMC have been proposed to deal with ambiguities associated with the uncalculated higher order terms in the pQCD series, i.e. the single-scale-setting approach (PMCs) and the procedures based on "intrinsic conformality" (PMC$_\infty$). In this paper, we will give a detailed comparison of these PMC approaches by comparing their predictions for three important quantities $R_{e^+e^-}$, $R_{\tau}$, and $\Gamma(H \to b \bar{b})$ up to four-loop pQCD corrections. The PMCs approach determines an overall effective running coupling $\alpha_s(Q)$ by the recursive use of the renormalization group equation, whose argument $Q$ represents the actual momentum flow of the process. Our numerical results show that the PMCs method, which involves a somewhat simpler analysis, can serve as a reliable substitute for the full multi-scale PMCm method, and that it leads to more precise pQCD predictions with less residual scale dependence.Comment: 16 pages, 3 figure