Rapid flush technique for donor hepatectomy: Safety and efficacy of an improved method of liver recovery for transplantation

This report describes a 2-year retrospective review of 437 donor hepatectomies comparing our experience with both the conventional and rapid flush techniques. In this retrospective review we have compared this new rapid technique to that of the conventional. The population of donors comprising the two groups were not significantly different, although there was a trend to use slightly more compromised donors when the rapid technique was used. Despite this trend, overall graft function, as assessed by peak flush group. Finally, the rate of primary nonfunction of hepatic grafts was reduced by the use of this new technique. In summary, the rapid flush technique yields high quality organs, is well accepted by the transplant community, and has become the procedure of choice for organ procurement

Analysis of donor criteria for the prediction of outcome in clinical liver transplantation.

The results of 219 orthotopic human liver transplants performed during 1985 at the University of Pittsburgh were reviewed to determine whether donor parameters could be used to predict the quality of early graft function. Multivariate discriminant analysis demonstrated that traditional parameters of donor assessment are unreliable predictors of poor graft function. Furthermore, 56% of the donors considered poor by conservative selection criteria produced livers with good early posttransplant function. Survival of recipients of primary allografts from donors rated poor was no different than survival of recipients of allografts from donors rated good

Endovascular Aortic Repair: The Renal Side of the Story

n/

Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI)is associated with mortality, amputation, and impaired quality of life. These Global Vascular Guidelines (GVG)are focused on definition, evaluation, and management of CLTI with the goals of improving evidence-based care and highlighting critical research needs. The term CLTI is preferred over critical limb ischemia, as the latter implies threshold values of impaired perfusion rather than a continuum. CLTI is a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD)in combination with rest pain, gangrene, or a lower limb ulceration >2 weeks duration. Venous, traumatic, embolic, and nonatherosclerotic etiologies are excluded. All patients with suspected CLTI should be referred urgently to a vascular specialist. Accurately staging the severity of limb threat is fundamental, and the Society for Vascular Surgery Threatened Limb Classification system, based on grading of Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI)is endorsed. Objective hemodynamic testing, including toe pressures as the preferred measure, is required to assess CLTI. Evidence-based revascularization (EBR)hinges on three independent axes: Patient risk, Limb severity, and ANatomic complexity (PLAN). Average-risk and high-risk patients are defined by estimated procedural and 2-year all-cause mortality. The GVG proposes a new Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), which involves defining a preferred target artery path (TAP)and then estimating limb-based patency (LBP), resulting in three stages of complexity for intervention. The optimal revascularization strategy is also influenced by the availability of autogenous vein for open bypass surgery. Recommendations for EBR are based on best available data, pending level 1 evidence from ongoing trials. Vein bypass may be preferred for average-risk patients with advanced limb threat and high complexity disease, while those with less complex anatomy, intermediate severity limb threat, or high patient risk may be favored for endovascular intervention. All patients with CLTI should be afforded best medical therapy including the use of antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glycemic control agents, as well as counseling on smoking cessation, diet, exercise, and preventive foot care. Following EBR, long-term limb surveillance is advised. The effectiveness of nonrevascularization therapies (eg, spinal stimulation, pneumatic compression, prostanoids, and hyperbaric oxygen)has not been established. Regenerative medicine approaches (eg, cell, gene therapies)for CLTI should be restricted to rigorously conducted randomizsed clinical trials. The GVG promotes standardization of study designs and end points for clinical trials in CLTI. The importance of multidisciplinary teams and centers of excellence for amputation prevention is stressed as a key health system initiative. © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery and European Society for Vascular Surger

Duplex ultrasound scanning defines operative strategies for patients with limb-threatening ischemia

AbstractPurpose: To characterize the accuracy of color-flow duplex ultrasound (DUS) in planning lower extremity revascularization procedures, we prospectively compared operations predicted by means of DUS arterial scanning (DUSAS) and operations predicted by means of conventional angiography (CA) with actual operations performed in 36 patients undergoing 40 vascular reconstructions for critical (grade II/III) lower extremity ischemia. Methods: All patients were examined with lower extremity DUSAS followed by CA. DUSAS was performed from the aorta to the pedal vessels of the affected extremity. Adequacy of inflow was assessed, and the best distal target vessel with continuous, unobstructed flow was defined. An operative prediction was made and recorded based upon the DUSAS findings, and in a blinded fashion, based upon subsequent CA. The McNemar test for comparing correlated proportions was applied to test for the statistical significance of the difference (P < .05) between correct operations predicted by DUSAS and CA. Results: Of the actual operations performed, 83% were correctly predicted by means of DUSAS (95% CI; range, 77% to 89%). Seven operations were incorrectly predicted with DUSAS. Of the actual operations performed, 90% were correctly predicted by means of CA (95% CI; range, 81% to 99%). Four operations were incorrectly predicted with CA. The McNemar test determined that the difference between correct operations predicted by means of DUSAS and correct operations predicted by means of CA was not statistically significant (P = .50). Conclusions: With few exceptions, DUSAS can be used to reliably predict infrainguinal reconstruction strategies. Vessels defined as adequate with DUSAS are rarely unfit for bypass. Prospective investigation of lower extremity revascularization based solely upon DUSAS is warranted. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:482-91.

Management and outcome of chronic atherosclerotic infrarenal aortic occlusion

AbstractPurpose: To evaluate the management and outcome of chronic atherosclerotic infrarenal aortic occlusion (IRAO), a review of 48 patients who were treated for angiographically documented IRAO between January 1980 and December 1994 was undertaken. Mean follow-up was 45 months. Mean age was 57 years (range, 33 to 88 years). Forty-seven patients were heavy smokers. Symptoms included claudication in 81%, rest pain in 25%, and tissue loss in 15%. Impotence was documented in 73% of men. Associated arterial disease included inferior mesenteric artery occlusion in 31 patients, renal artery stenosis or occlusion in 12, superior mesenteric artery stenosis in two, and celiac artery stenosis in one.Methods: Forty inflow procedures were performed, including 17 thoracobifemoral bypass (TBF) procedures, 15 aortobifemoral/iliac bypass (ABFI) procedures, and eight axillo-bifemoral bypass (AXBF) procedures. Eight patients were managed without surgery. The thoracic aorta was chosen as the inflow source in 17 patients because of previous abdominal aortic surgery in eight, poor status of the abdominal aorta in eight, and horseshoe kidney in one.Results: The overall operative mortality rate was 5%, and the perioperative morbidity rate was 18%. There was no statistical difference in perioperative mortality and morbidity rates among the operative groups. The five-year survival rate (life-table) for all IRAO patients was 67%. TBF and ABFI revascularization procedures yielded 5-year patency rates of 71% and 79%, respectively ( p < 0.05). All eight patients who underwent AXBF died or had occluded grafts at 3 years after surgery. Two-year patency rates (life-table) for TBF, ABFI, and AXBF were 92%, 92%, and 44%, respectively. The AXBF patency rate was significantly inferior to those of TBF and ABFI ( p < 0.05). Changes in ankle-brachial indexes after TBF or ABFI were similar, but were significantly greater than changes after AXBF ( p < 0.05). Three patients in the nonoperative group died, and two underwent major amputation. Acute renal failure did not occur in our study population. Follow-up creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dl were documented in three operative patients and in one nonoperative patient, and none required dialysis.Conclusions: In patients who have IRAO, aorta-based inflow procedures are superior to AXBF both in hemodynamic outcome and in patency rates. Treatment of IRAO with TBF or ABFI yields similar long-term results; the descending thoracic aorta represents an excellent inflow alternative to the abdominal aorta. Clinically significant renal impairment is rarely associated with IRAO. Nonoperative management of IRAO is associated with an increased mortality rate and a high rate of limb loss. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:394-405.