Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: Rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX)

Background: Radiation absorbed by interventional cardiologists is a frequently under-evaluated important issue. Aim is to compare radiation dose absorbed by interventional cardiologists during percutaneous coronary procedures for acute coronary syndromes comparing transradial and transfemoral access. Methods: The randomized multicentre MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by TRansradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of angioX) trial has been designed to compare the clinical outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes treated invasively according to the access site (transfemoral vs. transradial) and to the anticoagulant therapy (bivalirudin vs. heparin). Selected experienced interventional cardiologists involved in this study have been equipped with dedicated thermoluminescent dosimeters to evaluate the radiation dose absorbed during transfemoral or right transradial or left transradial access. For each access we evaluate the radiation dose absorbed at wrist, at thorax and at eye level. Consequently the operator is equipped with three sets (transfemoral, right transradial or left transradial access) of three different dosimeters (wrist, thorax and eye dosimet

Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.

Summary Background It is unclear whether radial compared with femoral access improves outcomes in unselected patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management. Methods We did a randomised, multicentre, superiority trial comparing transradial against transfemoral access in patients with acute coronary syndrome with or without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who were about to undergo coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to radial or femoral access with a web-based system. The randomisation sequence was computer generated, blocked, and stratified by use of ticagrelor or prasugrel, type of acute coronary syndrome (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, troponin positive or negative, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome), and anticipated use of immediate percutaneous coronary intervention. Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The 30-day coprimary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and net adverse clinical events, defined as major adverse cardiovascular events or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) major bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The analysis was by intention to treat. The two-sided α was prespecified at 0·025. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01433627. Findings We randomly assigned 8404 patients with acute coronary syndrome, with or without ST-segment elevation, to radial (4197) or femoral (4207) access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. 369 (8·8%) patients with radial access had major adverse cardiovascular events, compared with 429 (10·3%) patients with femoral access (rate ratio [RR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·74-0·99; p=0·0307), non-significant at α of 0·025. 410 (9·8%) patients with radial access had net adverse clinical events compared with 486 (11·7%) patients with femoral access (0·83, 95% CI 0·73-0·96; p=0·0092). The difference was driven by BARC major bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (1·6% vs 2·3%, RR 0·67, 95% CI 0·49-0·92; p=0·013) and all-cause mortality (1·6% vs 2·2%, RR 0·72, 95% CI 0·53-0·99; p=0·045). Interpretation In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management, radial as compared with femoral access reduces net adverse clinical events, through a reduction in major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Funding The Medicines Company and Terumo. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd

Adherence of ticagrelOr in real world patients with aCute coronary syndrome: The AD-HOC study

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor antagonist is the cornerstone of therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Adherence to medical therapy is an important issue, as premature DAPT discontinuation increases the risk of new ischemic events. The aim of the present observational prospective multicenter study was to evaluate in the real-world incidence and discontinuation patterns of ticagrelor during the first 12 months after ACS. Methods: We analyzed 431 ACS patients, discharged with ticagrelor, by 7 Italian centers. The primary end-point was the incidence of cessation of ticagrelor up to 12 months from the index event. Results: Definitive ticagrelor cessations occurred in 52 patients (12.1%), of which 35 were discontinuations (clinically driven) and 17 disruptions (due to acute events). Temporary cessation occurred in 14 cases (3.3%). Age ≥ 80 years and anticoagulant therapy were independent predictors of premature discontinuation. Bleeding occurred in 74 patients, of which 25 suffered a BARC ≥ 2 bleeding event. Bleeding were more frequent in female sex (27.0% vs 17.2%, p-value 0.049) and in patients with a history of bleeding (8.1% vs 2.9%, p-value 0.035). Conclusions: Our study found that the adherence to DAPT with ticagrelor after an ACS is still an important issue, premature discontinuation occurred mainly in fragile patients, like elderly, who suffered a previous bleeding or underwent previous percutaneous coronary intervention

Transcatheter aortic‐valve implantation with or without on‐site cardiac surgery: The TRACS trial

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an effective and safe treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. The indication to TAVI should be agreed upon by a Heart Team, and the procedure should be performed in centers with on-site cardiac surgery. However, TAVI complications requiring emergent cardiac surgery (ECS) have become very rare. Concurrently, access disparities and prolonged waiting times are pressing issues due to increasing clinical demand of TAVI. Many solutions have been proposed and one of them is the possibility of performing TAVI in centers without on-site cardiac surgery. Methods and Design: The Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation with or without on-site Cardiac Surgery (TRACS) trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study with blinded adjudicated evaluation of outcomes. Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and deemed inoperable, at high surgical risk, or presenting with at least 1 clinical factor compromising the benefit/risk ratio for ECS, will be randomized to undergo TAVI either in centers with or without on-site cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint will be the composite occurrence of all-cause death, stroke, and hospital readmission for cardiovascular causes at one year. The safety endpoint will include death attributable to periprocedural complications actionable by ECS. The study aims to enroll 566 patients. Implications: The TRACS trial aims to address critical gaps in knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of TAVI procedures performed in centers without on-site cardiac surgery, potentially improving access and outcomes for high-risk patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0575157