A randomized controlled trial of pretransplant antiviral therapy to prevent recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection recurs in liver recipients who are viremic at transplantation. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to test the efficacy and safety of pretransplant pegylated interferon alpha‐2b plus ribavirin (Peg‐IFN‐α2b/RBV) for prevention of post‐transplant HCV recurrence. Enrollees had HCV and were listed for liver transplantation, with either potential living donors or Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease upgrade for hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with HCV genotypes (G) 1/4/6 (n = 44/2/1) were randomized 2:1 to treatment (n = 31) or untreated control (n = 16); HCV G2/3 (n=32) were assigned to treatment. Overall, 59 were treated and 20 were not. Peg‐IFN‐α2b, starting at 0.75 μg/kg/week, and RBV, starting at 600 mg/day, were escalated as tolerated. Patients assigned to treatment versus control had similar baseline characteristics. Combined virologic response (CVR) included pretransplant sustained virologic response and post‐transplant virologic response (pTVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after end of treatment or transplant, respectively. In intent‐to‐treat analyses, 12 (19%) assigned to treatment and 1 (6%) assigned to control achieved CVR ( P = 0.29); per‐protocol values were 13 (22%) and 0 (0%) ( P = 0.03). Among treated G1/4/6 patients, 23 of 30 received transplant, of whom 22% had pTVR; among treated G2/3 patients 21 of 29 received transplant, of whom 29% had pTVR. pTVR was 0%, 18%, and 50% in patients treated for 16 weeks, respectively ( P = 0.01). Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred with similar frequency in treated versus untreated patients (68% versus 55%; P = 0.30), but the number of SAEs per patient was higher in the treated group (2.7 versus 1.3; P = 0.003). Conclusion : Pretransplant treatment with Peg‐IFN‐α2b/RBV prevents post‐transplant recurrence of HCV in selected patients. Efficacy is higher with >16 weeks of treatment, but treatment is associated with increased risk of potentially serious complications. (H EPATOLOGY 2013)Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/97469/1/25976_ftp.pd

United Kingdom criteria for liver transplantation in the setting of isolated unresectable colorectal liver metastases

Aim Studies have demonstrated that liver transplantation may be an effective treatment for isolated unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Published data suggest that 5-year survival may be as high as 80%; however, recurrent disease is commonplace. Consequently, the Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Fixed Term Working Unit recommended to the NHS Blood and Transplant Liver Advisory Group that while CRCLM is an appropriate indication for transplantation, selection criteria should be conservative and that it should be undertaken within a clinical service evaluation programme. The aim of this work is to outline the proposed UK selection criteria and follow-up process for CRCLM transplantation. Method Consensus statement by colorectal cancer/liver transplantation patient representatives, experts in colorectal cancer surgery/oncology, liver transplantation surgery, hepatology, hepatobiliary radiology, hepatobiliary pathology and nuclear medicine. Results This study provides a comprehensive outline of the inclusion/exclusion criteria for referral in the UK. Furthermore, the referral framework is also explained. Pretransplant assessment criteria for listing/delisting are outlined. Finally, the oncology-specific outcome measures posttransplant are described. Conclusion It is anticipated this service will begin in December 2022. A series of educational events for the referrers and transplant units will be arranged throughout 2023 to highlight CRCLM as a newly accepted UK indication for transplantation. A national audit will be undertaken to identify patients currently on treatment who meet the criteria for transplant. Data will be collected in a national registry and reviewed on an ongoing basis to confirm the safety of this treatment and to determine if the inclusion criteria require revision

The unfinished legacy of liver transplantation: Emphasis on immunology

Liver transplantation radically changed the philosophy of hepatology practice, enriched multiple areas of basic science, and had pervasive ripple effects in law, public policy, ethics, and theology. Why organ engraftment was feasible remained enigmatic, however, until the discovery in 1992 of donor leukocyte microchimerism in long-surviving liver, and other kinds of organ recipients. Following this discovery, the leukocyte chimerism-associated mechanisms were elucidated that directly linked organ and bone marrow transplantation and eventually clarified the relationship of transplantation immunology to the immunology of infections, neoplasms, and autoimmune disorders. We describe here how the initially controversial paradigm shift mandated revisions of cherished dogmas. With the fresh insight, the reasons for numerous inexplicable phenomena of transplantation either became obvious or have become susceptible to discriminate experimental testing. The therapeutic implications of the "new immunology" in hepatology and in other medical disciplines, have only begun to be explored. Apart from immunology, physiologic investigations of liver transplantation have resulted in the discovery of growth factors (beginning with insulin) that are involved in the regulation of liver size, ultrastructure, function, and the capacity for regeneration. Such studies have partially explained functional and hormonal relationships of different abdominal organs, and ultimately they led to the cure or palliation by liver transplantation of more than 2 dozen hepatic-based inborn errors of metabolism. Liver transplantation should not be viewed as a purely technologic achievement, but rather as a searchlight whose beams have penetrated the murky mist of the past, and continue to potentially illuminate the future. Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Longterm Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

AIMS: Recent data have demonstrated greater than 80% one-year survival probability after liver transplantation (LT) for patients with severe acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF). However, long term outcomes and complications are still unknown for this population. Our aim was to compare long-term patient and graft survival among patients transplanted across all grades of ACLF. METHODS: We analyzed the UNOS database, years 2004-2017. Patients with ACLF were identified using the EASL-CLIF criteria. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to determine patient and graft survival and associated predictors of mortality in adjusted models. RESULTS: A total of 75,844 patients were transplanted of which 48,854 (64.4%) had no ACLF, 9,337 (12.3%) had ACLF-1, 9,386 (12.4%) had ACLF-2 and 8,267 (10.9%) had ACLF-3. Patients transplanted without ACLF had a greater proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma within (23.8%) and outside (12.7%) Milan criteria. Five-year patient survival after LT was lower in the ACLF-3 patients compared with the other groups (67.7%, p<0.001), although after year 1, the percentage decrease in survival was similar among all groups. Infection was the primary cause of death among all patient groups in the first year. After the first year, infection was the main cause of death in patients transplanted with ACLF-1 (31.1%), ACLF-2 (33.3%) and ACLF-3 (36.7%), whereas malignancy was the predominant cause of death in those transplanted with no ACLF (38.5%). Graft survival probability at 5 years was above 90% among all patient groups. CONCLUSION: Patients transplanted with ACLF-3 have lower 5-year survival as compared to ACLF 0-2 but mortality rates were not significantly different after the first year following LT. Graft survival was excellent across all ACLF groups

Consensus Statement on Hemostatic Management, Anticoagulation, and Antiplatelet Therapy in Liver Transplantation

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies are increasingly used in liver transplant (LT) candidates and recipients due to cardiovascular comorbidities, portal vein thrombosis, or to manage posttransplant complications. The implementation of the new direct-acting oral anticoagulants and the recently developed antiplatelet drugs is a great challenge for transplant teams worldwide, as their activity must be monitored and their complications managed, in the absence of robust scientific evidence. In this changing and clinically heterogeneous scenario, the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis aimed to achieve consensus regarding the indications, drugs, dosing, and timing of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies initiated from the inclusion of the patient on the waiting list to post-LT surveillance. A multidisciplinary group of experts composed by transplant hepatologists, surgeons, hematologists, transplant-specialized anesthesiologists, and intensivists performed a comprehensive review of the literature and identified 21 clinically relevant questions using the patient-intervention-comparison-outcome format. A preliminary list of recommendations was drafted and further validated using a modified Delphi approach by a panel of 24 transplant delegates, each representing a LT institution in Spain. The present consensus statement contains the key recommendations together with the core supporting scientific evidence, which will provide guidance for improved and more homogeneous clinical decision making