P-181: Fixed-dose valsartan + hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors: The vast study

Objectives: To determine whether the combination of valsartan 160 mg and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg once-daily (od) is more effective than amlodipine 10 mg od in reducing systolic blood pressure (BP) in patients suffering from moderate hypertension combined with at least one other cardiovascular risk factor or concomitant condition. Further, to study the effects of treatment on vascular markers. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, three-arm study over 24 weeks. After a two-week single-blind placebo run-in period, 1088 stage-II hypertensive patients with additional risk factors were randomized to three groups, two receiving valsartan 160 mg od and one group receiving amlodipine 5 mg od. At Week 4, HCTZ 12.5 mg and 25 mg respectively, were added to the valsartan groups and the amlodipine dose was force-titrated to 10 mg od. Patients were followed-up for a total of 24 weeks. Results: The combination of valsartan 160 mg+HCTZ 25 mg reduced systolic BP significantly (p<0.05) more than amlodipine monotherapy (least-squares mean changes from baseline 29.7±0.7 mmHg and 27.6± 0.7 mmHg, respectively). For diastolic BP the values were 11.1±0.4 mmHg and 10.8±0.4 mmHg, respectively (differences not significant). Levels of IL-6, t-PA antigen and hs-CRP were reduced with both combination therapies at week 12 (figure). Significantly more patients discontinued because of adverse events in the amlodipine group (18.2%) than in the combination-therapy groups (4.2% and 3.5%) over the 6 months treatment period. Conclusions: Valsartan 160 mg+HCTZ 25 mg is an effective and well-tolerated therapy in this patient population with possible beneficial effects on vascular marker

Role of neprilysin inhibitor combinations in hypertension: insights from hypertension and heart failure trials

Neprilysin is a neutral endopeptidase and its inhibition increases bioavailability of natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and substance P, resulting in natriuretic, vasodilatatory, and anti-proliferative effects. In concert, these effects are prone to produce a powerful ventricular unloading and antihypertensive response. LCZ696 (Valsartan/sacubitril) is a first-in-class angiotensin II-receptor neprilysin inhibitor. LCZ696 is a novel drug not only for the treatment of heart failure but it is also likely to be a useful antihypertensive drug and may have a preferential effect on systolic pressure. This review discusses (i) the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of this novel drug, (ii) the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LCZ696 in treatment of hypertension from the available trials, (iii) evidence from other contemporary trials on combined Neprilysin inhibitors, (iv) future trials and areas of research to identify hypertensive patient populations that would most benefit from LCZ69

Ace inhibition and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in essential hypertension: The end of the search or a need for further investigations?

Scientific evidence currently available supports the concept that renin-angiotensin blockade with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors as a first-line treatment exhibits in arterial hypertension beneficial effects in the prevention of mortality and morbidity comparable to those achieved with diuretics and β-blockers. In addition, the renin-angiotensin blockade has also proved to be beneficial in the secondary prevention of several complications of hypertensive disease such as after myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure, as well as in the prevention of the incidence of type 2 diabetes, and the progression of diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathy. In this later regard, recent evidence with angiotensin II receptor antagonists in reducing the progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes strongly confirms that antagonism of the renin-angiotensin system is an effective approach to cardiovascular and renal disease. Finally, the renin-angiotensin blockade in high-risk patients may reduce cardiovascular mortality independently of the effect on blood pressure (BP). The effect of other antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular risk in patients with high-normal BP should be investigated to establish whether they exhibit a comparable effect or whether there is a class-related benefit of drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin system. Such a strategy could also be encouraged to design future interventional studies with the newer classes of compounds (angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonists, vasopeptidase inhibitors, endothelin antagonists), which would have the additional potential advantage of providing information more easily transferable to large-scale clinical practice. Am J Hypertens 2002;15:367-371 © 2002 American Journal of Hypertension, Lt

Forma-construcción en la arquitectura religiosa de Luis Moya Blanco

Trabajo de investigación incluido en los objetivos del Proyecto I+D+i "Relación forma-construcción en la arquitectura religiosa de Luis Moya Blanco", subvencionado por el Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, referencia HAR2011-28916 (2012/2013

Clinical efficacy and safety of olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease that contributes to the premature death of millions of people each year, and identification and treatment of hypertension continues to be a challenge. Guidelines recommend that many patients will require two or more antihypertensive agents from different classes. Combining an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) has been shown in clinical studies to increase the antihypertensive efficacy of both agents compared with either agent alone. This review covers several clinical trials and aims to examine several aspects of the efficacy of the combination of olmesartan and HCTZ, including dose-responsiveness, long-term efficacy, goal rate achievement, and efficacy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. The results presented here demonstrate that olmesartan is effective when added to HCTZ monotherapy or when HCTZ is added to olmesartan monotherapy, both over the short and long term. Moderate to severe hypertension responds well to olmesartan/HCTZ combination therapy, and the great majority of patients are able to achieve recommended blood pressure targets. Thus olmesartan/HCTZ is a well-tolerated option for patients who fail to respond to monotherapy and as initial therapy in those who require large reductions in diastolic blood pressure or systolic blood pressure to achieve goal blood pressure

Novedades. Guías de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología en Hipertensión arterial 2019

XIII Curso de Fisiopatología Cardiovascular. Madrid, 13-14 diciembre, 2019Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares; Sociedad Española de Cardiologí

Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Refractory Hypertension : A Prospective Study

The objective of this study was to establish whether ambulatory blood pressure offers a better estimate of cardiovascular risk than does its clinical blood pressure counterpart in refractory hypertension. This prospective study assessed the incidence of cardiovascular events over time during an average follow-up of 49 months (range, 6 to 96). Patients were referred to specialized hypertension clinics (86 essential hypertension patients who had diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg during antihypertensive treatment that included three or more antihypertensive drugs, one being a diuretic). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed at the time of entrance. End-organ damage was monitored yearly, and the incidence of cardiovascular events was recorded. Patients were divided into tertiles of average diastolic blood pressure during activity according to the ABPM, with the lowest tertile 97 mm Hg (HT, n=28). While significant differences in systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressures were observed among groups, no differences were observed at either the beginning or at the time of the last evaluation for office blood pressure. During the last evaluation, a progression in the end-organ damage score was observed for the HT group but not for the two other groups. Twenty-one of the patients had a new cardiovascular event; the incidence of events was significantly lower for the LT group (2.2 per 100 patient-years) than it was for the MT group (9.5 per 100 patient-years) or for the HT group (13.6 per 100 patient-years). The probability of event-free survival was also significantly different when comparing the LT group with the other two groups (LT versus MT log-rank, P<.04; LT versus HT log-rank, P<.006). The HT group was an independent risk factor for the incidence of cardiovascular events (relative risk, 6.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 28.1, P<.02). Higher values of ambulatory blood pressure result in a worse prognosis in patients with refractory hypertension, supporting the recommendation that ABPM is useful in stratifying the cardiovascular risk in patients with refractory hypertension.Redon Mas, Josep, [email protected]

P-182: 24-hour ambulatory blood-pressure effects of valsartan + hydrochlorothiazide combinations compared with amlodipine in hypertensive patients at increased cardiovascular risk

In a randomised, double-blind trial, the effects on 24-hr ABP of the combination valsartan 160 mg od and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 or 12.5 mg during 24 weeks of therapy were compared with the effects of amlodipine 10 mg monotherapy (group A10) in 474 stage-II hypertensive patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors. After a two-week single-blind placebo run-in period, patients were randomised to receive valsartan 160 mg od or amlodipine 5 mg od. At Week 4, HCTZ 12.5 mg (group V160/HCTZ12.5) and 25 mg (group V160/HCTZ25) were added to the valsartan groups and in the A10 patients the amlodipine dose was force-titrated to 10 mg od. All treatments reduced BP as well as night-time and daytime BP levels from baseline. 24-hr SBP was reduced by 15.9 ±1.0 mmHg (least-squares mean change ±SE), 19.3 ±1.0 mmHg and 16.1 ±1.1 mmHg in the V160/HCTZ12.5, V160/HCTZ25 and A10 groups, respectively and 24-hr DBP was reduced by 9.3 ±0.6 mmHg, 11.4 ±0.6 mmHg and 9.6 ±0.7 mmHg in the three groups. The differences between the V160/HCTZ25 group and the A10 group were significant (p<0.05) for the changes in 24-hr systolic BP as well as for changes in daytime systolic BP and night-time diastolic BP. Control rates defined as ABPM ≤130/80 mmHg were: 48.4%, 60.8% and 50.9% in the V160/HCTZ12.5, V160/25 and A10 groups, respectively; the differences between the V160/HCTZ25 group and the other two treatment groups were significant at p<0.05. (See Figure) In conclusion, the fixed-dose combination of valsartan 160 mg + HCTZ 25 mg od is an attractive therapeutic option measured on the effects on 24-hr ABPM, night-time and daytime BP reduction and control rates in hypertensive patients at additional cardiovascular ris

Amlodipine and valsartan as components of a rational and effective fixed-dose combination

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension is effective in preventing cardiovascular and renal complications. Calcium antagonists and blockers of the renin-angiotensin system are widely used today to initiate antihypertensive therapy but, when given as monotherapy, do not suffice in most patients to normalize blood pressure. Combining the two types of agents considerably increases the antihypertensive efficacy, but not at the expense of a deterioration of tolerability. This is exemplified by the experience accumulated with the recently developed fixed dose combination containing the AT1-receptor blocker valsartan (160 mg) and the dihydropyridine amlodipine (5 or 10 mg). In a randomized trial, an 8-week treatment normalized blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg) within 8 weeks in a large fraction of hypertensive patients (78.4% and 85.2% using the 5/160 [n = 371] and 10/160 mg [n = 377] dosage, respectively). Like all AT1-receptor blockers valsartan has a placebo-like tolerability. Valsartan prevents to a large extent the occurrence amlodipine-induced peripheral edema. Both amlodipine and valsartan have beneficial effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as well as protective effects on renal function. The co-administration of these two agents is therefore very attractive, as it enables a rapid and sustained blood pressure control in hypertensive patients. The availability of a fixed-dose combination based on amlodipine and valsartan is expected therefore to facilitate the management of hypertension, to improve long-term adherence with antihypertensive therapy and, ultimately, to have a positive impact on cardiovascular and renal outcomes