Neurofascin-155 IgM autoantibodies in patients with inflammatory neuropathies

Objectives Recently, IgG autoantibodies against different paranodal proteins have been detected and this has led to important advances in the management of inflammatory neuropathies. In contrast, not much is known on IgM autoantibodies against paranodal proteins. Methods In the present study, we screened a large cohort of patients (n=140) with inflammatory neuropathies for IgM autoantibodies against neurofascin-155, neurofascin-186 or contactin-1. Results IgM autoantibodies against neurofascin-155 were detected by ELISA in five patients, four with inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and one with Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), and were confirmed by ELISA-based preabsorption experiments and Western blot. Titres ranged from 1:100 to 1:400. We did not detect IgM anti-neurofascin-186 or anti-contactin-1 antibodies in this cohort. All patients presented with distally accentuated tetraparesis and hypesthesia. Remarkably, tremor was present in three of the patients with CIDP and occurred in the patients with GBS after the acute phase of disease. Nerve conduction studies revealed prolonged distal motor latencies and F wave latencies. Nerve biopsies showed signs of secondary axonal damage in three of the patients, demyelinating features in one patient. Teased fibre preparations did not demonstrate paranodal damage. Conclusion In summary, IgM neurofascin-155 autoantibodies may be worth testing in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. Their pathogenic role needs to be determined in future experiments

Super-resolution of nodal and paranodal disruption in anti-pan-neurofascin-associated autoimmune nodopathy

IntroductionIn autoimmune nodopathies, autoantibodies target the nodes of Ranvier, impairing saltatory nerve conduction. Understanding the impact of autoantibody binding on protein assembly is crucial for gaining insights into the pathogenicity of different autoantibodies. We investigated nodal, paranodal, and cytoskeletal axonal proteins in teased fibers from a sural nerve biopsy of a patient with anti-pan-neurofascin autoantibodies. Conventional diagnostic tools, including fluorescence microscopy, often miss subtle alterations at the ultrastructural level.MethodsWe utilized direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM), a super-resolution fluorescence imaging technique, to assess the nanoscale architecture of nodal, paranodal, and cytoskeletal axonal proteins.ResultWhile conventional fluorescence microscopy revealed severe paranodal and nodal damage in 14% of the nodes, with 86% appearing normal at first glance, the super-resolved images revealed a decreased neurofascin-155 and Caspr-1 density, but preserved colocalization of these adhesion proteins in paranodes that initially seemed normal. At the nodes, sodium channel density and distribution remained intact, but neurofascin-186 density was reduced. Axonal beta-IV spectrin was altered only in severely damaged nodes. This indicates that axonal integrity is largely preserved, with a potentially reversible decrease in paranodal and nodal adhesion proteins in patients with nodopathy revealing subtle alterations in nodal integrity that are not apparent with conventional imaging.DiscussionThese likely reversible changes may explain the rapid recovery seen in patients with anti-pan-neurofascin autoantibodies following autoantibody depletion. Conversely, the small percentage of severely and axonally damaged nodes may account for the residual symptoms experienced by most patients

Inter‐laboratory validation of nodal/paranodal antibody testing

Background and Aims: Reliable detection of antibodies against nodal targets is vital for the diagnosis of autoimmune nodopathies. The performance characteristics of recently developed in-house assays are unknown. We compared testing at four centres. Methods: Each submitted 29–40 serum samples to a coordinating centre from one of three groups: (1) autoimmune nodopathy patients, with positive nodal/paranodal antibodies; (2) seronegative patients with other inflammatory neuropathies, and (3) healthy individuals or those with other neurological diseases. The coordinating centre recoded all samples and returned 160 identical aliquots to each testing centre for blinded testing. Once data from all centres had been received by the coordinating centre, unblinded results were returned for analysis. Sensitivity was defined by the proportion of group 1 samples returned as positive. Accuracy was defined as 0.075(sensitivity) + 0.925(specificity). Results: Centres performed various combinations of ELISA, cell-based (CBAs) and teased-nerve fibre assays. All labs produced highly accurate results (96%–100%) and concordance for the overall result across at least 3 or all 4 test centres was observed for 98% and 89% of the samples respectively. However, 10/30 individual assays (6/14 CBAs and 4/16 ELISAs) were less than 90% sensitive. Only 3 assays had more than 1 false positive result (2 ELISAs and 1 CBA). Combining different assay modalities to produce an overall result did not improve accuracy. Inter-laboratory consistency in the determination of antibody subclasses was poor. Interpretation: Although most samples were correctly categorised in all 4 centres, the use of a specific test modality or multiple tests did not guarantee accuracy. Early and repeated interlaboratory testing with sharing of samples is important to understand test performance and reproducibility, identify areas for improvement and maintain consistency. To aid this, we provide detailed methods for the best performing tests. Further standardisation of antibody subclass determination is required

Guillain-Barre syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection in an international prospective cohort study

In the wake of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, an increasing number of patients with neurological disorders, including Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), have been reported following this infection. It remains unclear, however, if these cases are coincidental or not, as most publications were case reports or small regional retrospective cohort studies. The International GBS Outcome Study is an ongoing prospective observational cohort study enrolling patients with GBS within 2 weeks from onset of weakness. Data from patients included in this study, between 30 January 2020 and 30 May 2020, were used to investigate clinical and laboratory signs of a preceding or concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection and to describe the associated clinical phenotype and disease course. Patients were classified according to the SARS-CoV-2 case definitions of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and laboratory recommendations of the World Health Organization. Forty-nine patients with GBS were included, of whom eight (16%) had a confirmed and three (6%) a probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nine of these 11 patients had no serological evidence of other recent preceding infections associated with GBS, whereas two had serological evidence of a recent Campylobacter jejuni infection. Patients with a confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection frequently had a sensorimotor variant 8/11 (73%) and facial palsy 7/11 (64%). The eight patients who underwent electrophysiological examination all had a demyelinating subtype, which was more prevalent than the other patients included in the same time window [14/30 (47%), P = 0.012] as well as historical region and age-matched control subjects included in the International GBS Outcome Study before the pandemic [23/44 (52%), P = 0.016]. The median time from the onset of infection to neurological symptoms was 16 days (interquartile range 12-22). Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection shared uniform neurological features, similar to those previously described in other post-viral GBS patients. The frequency (22%) of a preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection in our study population was higher than estimates of the contemporaneous background prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, which may be a result of recruitment bias during the pandemic, but could also indicate that GBS may rarely follow a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Consistent with previous studies, we found no increase in patient recruitment during the pandemic for our ongoing International GBS Outcome Study compared to previous years, making a strong relationship of GBS with SARS-CoV-2 unlikely. A case-control study is required to determine if there is a causative link or not

Contactin-1 and Neurofascin-155/-186 Are Not Targets of Auto-Antibodies in Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy is an immune mediated disease presenting with multifocal muscle weakness and conduction block. IgM auto-antibodies against the ganglioside GM1 are detectable in about 50% of the patients. Auto-antibodies against the paranodal proteins contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 and the nodal protein neurofascin-186 have been detected in subgroups of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Recently, auto-antibodies against neurofascin-186 and gliomedin were described in more than 60% of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. In the current study, we aimed to validate this finding, using a combination of different assays for auto-antibody detection. In addition we intended to detect further auto-antibodies against paranodal proteins, specifically contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 in multifocal motor neuropathy patients’ sera. We analyzed sera of 33 patients with well-characterized multifocal motor neuropathy for IgM or IgG anti-contactin-1, anti-neurofascin-155 or -186 antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, binding assays with transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells and murine teased fibers. We did not detect any IgM or IgG auto-antibodies against contactin-1, neurofascin-155 or -186 in any of our multifocal motor neuropathy patients. We conclude that auto-antibodies against contactin-1, neurofascin-155 and -186 do not play a relevant role in the pathogenesis in this cohort with multifocal motor neuropathy

Detection and characterization of auto-antibodies against paranodal proteins in patients with inflammatory polyneuropathy

Kürzlich wurden bei immunvermittelten Neuropathien Autoantikörper gegen Proteine des paranodalen axoglialen Komplexes beschrieben. Deren Charakteristika, Prävalenzen, pathophysiologische Relevanz sowie Bedeutung für Diagnostik und Therapie sind jedoch noch nicht abschließend erforscht. In dieser Studie wurden daher Seren und Plasmapheresematerial (PE-Material) von 150 Patienten mit inflammatorischen Neuropathien, nämlich 105 mit chronisch inflammatorischer demyelinisierender Polyneuropathie (CIDP), 21 mit Guillain- Barré-Syndrom (GBS) und 24 mit multifokaler motorischer Neuropathie (MMN), welche etablierte diagnostische Kriterien der jeweiligen Krankheit erfüllen, sowie 74 Kontrollen mittels immunhistochemischen Färbungen an murinen Zupfnervenpräparaten und/oder ELISA (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay) auf Autoantikörper gegen die paranodalen Proteine Caspr, Contactin-1 und Neurofascin- 155 untersucht. Bei positivem Ergebnis wurde deren Spezifität mittels immunhistochemischen Färbungen an transfizierten HEK (Human embryonic kidney)- 293-Zellen und Präinkubationsversuchen bestätigt. Es wurden die IgG-Subklassen und die Antikörpertiter bestimmt und das Komplementbindungsverhalten unter Zugabe von intravenösen Immunglobulinen (IVIG) mit zellbasierten und ELISA-basierten Methoden analysiert. Klinische Merkmale und das Therapieansprechen Antikörper-positiver Patienten wurden ermittelt und mit den experimentellen Ergebnissen in Zusammenhang gesetzt. IgG-Autoantikörper gegen Contactin-1 konnten bei vier Patienten mit CIDP nachgewiesen werden, IgG-Autoantikörper gegen Caspr bei einem Patienten mit CIDP und einer Patientin mit GBS. Es konnten keine weiteren Autoantikörper bei CIDP-Patienten, GBS-Patienten, MMN-Patienten oder bei den Kontrollen detektiert werden. Die Prävalenz von Autoantikörpern gegen axogliale paranodale Proteine liegt somit in dieser Studie bei jeweils 4,76% bei CIDP und GBS und 0% bei MMN. Die Antikörper gehörten bei Patienten in der akuten Erkrankungsphase (zwei der CIDP-Patienten mit Anti-Contactin-1-Autoantikörpern und eine GBS-Patientin mit Anti-Caspr-Autoantikörpern) hauptsächlich den Subklassen IgG1 und IgG3 an, bei Patienten in der chronischen Phase (zwei der CIDP-Patienten mit Anti-Contactin-1-Autoantikörpern, ein CIDP-Patient mit Anti-Caspr-Autoantikörpern) überwog die Subklasse IgG4. Experimentell kam es zur Komplementbindung und -aktivierung abhängig vom Gehalt der Subklassen IgG1-3, nicht aber IgG4; diese konnte durch die Zugabe von IVIG dosisabhängig gemindert werden. Alle Autoantikörper-positiven CIDP-Patienten zeigten einen GBS-artigen Beginn mit einer schweren motorischen Beteiligung. Anti-Contactin-1-positive Patienten kennzeichnete klinisch zusätzlich das Vorkommen einer Ataxie und eines Tremors, Anti-Caspr-positive Patienten das Vorkommen starker neuropathischer Schmerzen. Elektrophysiologisch standen neben Hinweisen auf eine Leitungsstörung Zeichen einer axonalen Schädigung im Vordergrund. Als histopathologisches Korrelat lagen eine nodale Architekturstörung und ein Axonverlust vor. Die Patienten zeigten nur in der Anfangsphase der Erkrankung ein Ansprechen auf IVIG. Bei drei CIDP-Patienten mit IgG4-Autoantikörpern (zwei Patienten mit Anti-Contactin-1-Antikörpern und ein Patient mit Anti-Caspr-Antikörpern) wurde eine Therapie mit Rituximab durchgeführt. Diese führte zu einer Titerreduktion und zur zeitgleichen klinischen und elektrophysiologischen Befundbesserung bei zwei Patienten. Die in dieser Arbeit angewandten Screeningmethoden führten zum erfolgreichen Nachweis von Autoantikörpern gegen paranodale axogliale Proteine. Die Patienten mit positivem Autoantikörpernachweis definieren eine kleine Untergruppe mit ähnlichen klinischen Merkmalen im Kollektiv der Patienten mit inflammatorischen Polyneuropathien. Histopathologische Merkmale sowie das Therapieansprechen auf antikörperdepletierende Therapie sprechen in Kombination mit den Ergebnissen weiterer Studien zu paranodalen Autoantikörpern für eine pathogenetische Relevanz der Autoantikörper. Mit einem charakteristischen, am Schnürring ansetzenden Pathomechanismus könnten Neuropathien mit Nachweis von paranodalen Autoantikörpern der kürzlich eingeführten Entität der Nodo-Paranodopathien angehören. Die Komplementaktivierung und das Therapieansprechen der Patienten auf IVIG stehen möglicherweise in Zusammenhang mit der prädominanten IgG-Subklasse. Diese könnte auch in Bezug auf die Chronifizierung eine Rolle spielen. Der Nachweis von Autoantikörpern gegen paranodale Proteine hat wohlmöglich in Zukunft direkte Konsequenzen auf das diagnostische und therapeutische Prozedere bei Patienten mit CIDP und GBS; weitere klinische und experimentelle Daten aus größeren, prospektiven Studien sind jedoch zum weiteren Verständnis und zur Charakterisierung dieser Entität notwendig.Autoantibodies against proteins of the paranodal axoglial complex have been described in recent studies on immune-mediated neuropathies. Nevertheless, their characteristics, prevalences, pathophysiological relevance and impact on diagnostics and therapy have not been fully investigated. Therefore, sera and plasmapheresis material (PE-material) of 150 patients with inflammatory neuropathy, including 105 patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), 21 patients with Guillain-Barré-Syndrome (GBS) and 24 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), fulfilling established diagnostic criteria for the respective disease, as well as 74 controls were screened for autoantibodies against the paranodal proteins caspr, contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 via immunohistochemic staining of murine teased fiber preparations and/or ELISA (Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay). In the event of a positive result, their specificity was confirmed via immunohistochemic staining on transfected HEK (human embryonic kidney)-293-cells and preincubation experiments. IgG subclasses and antibody titers in human material were analysed and complement binding to the autoantibodies, also under the influence of therapeutic immunoglobulins (IVIG), was investigated in cell based assays and ELISA based assays. Clinical features and therapy response in antibody-positive patients were evaluated and compared to the experimental results. IgG-autoantibodies against contactin-1 were found in four patients with CIDP, IgG-autoantibodies against caspr were found in one patient with CIDP and one with GBS. No further autoantibodies were detected neither in patients with CIDP, GBS and MMN nor in the controls. The prevalences of autoantibodies against axoglial paranodal proteins in this study therefore are at 4,76% in CIDP and GBS and 0% in MMN. In the acute phase of the disease, autoantibodies of the IgG1 and IgG3 subclass could be detected (in two CIDP patients with anti-contactin-1 antibodies and one GBS patient with anti-caspr antibodies), whereas patients in the chronic phase of the disease showed IgG4-autoantibodies (two CIDP patients with anti-contactin-1 antibodies and one CIDP patient with anti-caspr antibodies). Complement binding and activation in vitro depended on the amount of the IgG subclasses IgG1-IgG3, but not IgG4. Complement binding could be reduced by IVIG dose-dependently. All CIDP-patients with autoantibodies showed a GBSlike onset with severe motor involvement. Additional features of anti-contactin-1 positive neuropathy were ataxia and tremor, of anti-caspr positive disease neuropathic pain. Electrophysiological studies revealed signs of conduction failure accompanied by striking signs of axonal damage. As a histopathologic correlate, a disruption of the nodal architecture and axonal loss were found. Patients only responded well to IVIG in the beginning of the disease. Three patients with autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass (two patients with anti-contactin-1 and one patient with anti-caspr) were treated with rituximab, leading to a titer reduction accompanied by clinical and electrophysiological improvement in two patients. The screening methods used in this study are suitable for the detection of autoantibodies against paranodal proteins. Antibody-positive patients define a small subgroup of patients with inflammatory polyneuropathy that is characterized by distinct clinical features. Histopathological findings and therapy response to antibody- depleting treatment in this study as well as findings of further studies argue in favour of a pathogenetic relevance of the autoantibodies. Neuropathies associated with paranodal autoantibodies could belong to the new entity of nodo-paranodopathies, sharing a characteristic pathomechanism with the node of Ranvier being the site of attack. Complement binding and activation as well as response to IVIG could be related to the predominant IgG subclass of the autoantibodies. It could also influence the course and chronification of the disease. Therefore, detection of autoantibodies against paranodal proteins might have a direct impact on diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in patients with CIDP and GBS in the future. Nevertheless, further clinical and experimental data, including data from bigger and prospective studies are needed to understand and fully characterize this novel entity

Anti–contactin-1 Antibodies Affect Surface Expression and Sodium Currents in Dorsal Root Ganglia

Background and Objectives As autoantibodies to contactin-1 from patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy not only bind to the paranodes where they are supposed to cause conduction failure but also bind to other neuronal cell types, we aimed to investigate the effect of anti–contactin-1 autoantibodies on contactin-1 surface expression in cerebellar granule neurons, dorsal root ganglion neurons, and contactin-1–transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Methods Immunocytochemistry including structured illumination microscopy and immunoblotting was used to determine expression levels of contactin-1 and/or sodium channels after long-term exposure to autoantibodies from 3 seropositive patients. For functional analysis of sodium channels, whole-cell recordings of sodium currents were performed on dorsal root ganglion neurons incubated with anti–contactin-1 autoantibodies. Results We found a reduction in contactin-1 expression levels on dorsal root ganglion neurons, cerebellar granule neurons, and contactin-1–transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells and decreased dorsal root ganglion sodium currents after long-term exposure to anti–contactin-1 autoantibodies. Sodium channel density did not decrease. Discussion Our results demonstrate a direct effect of anti–contactin-1 autoantibodies on the surface expression of contactin-1 and sodium currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons. This may be the pathophysiologic correlate of sensory ataxia reported in these patients

Case report: target antigen and subclass switch in a patient with autoimmune nodopathy

Introduction: Autoimmune nodopathy (AN) is a new entity in the field of peripheral neuropathies and is defined by the presence of auto-antibodies against structures of the node of Ranvier combined with specific clinico-pathophysiological features and therapy response in affected patients. The target-specific antibodies do not only serve as diagnostic biomarkers but also for treatment evaluation during follow-up. Case report: We report a 66-year-old female patient with various autoimmune diseases, including a history of membranous glomerulonephritis which presented with acute-onset, sensorimotor tetraparesis, cranial nerve involvement, and mild respiratory insufficiency. Under the suspicion of Guillain–Barré syndrome, she received intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and achieved remission. At 8 months later, she relapsed with now a poor response to IVIg and developed additional features such as severe sensory ataxia, tremor, and neuropathic pain. Anti-contactin-1 IgG2 antibodies were detected, and the diagnosis was reverted to AN. Plasma exchange and rituximab treatment led to a serological remission and corresponding significant clinical improvement, and the therapy was paused. At 2 years after symptom onset, her condition worsened again with sensorimotor symptoms and severe neuropathic pain despite seronegativity for contactin-1. However, serum binding assays to teased nerve fiber staining showed recurring antibody reactivity against paranodal structures. Caspr-1 was identified as a new target antigen via cell-based assay, and high-titer antibodies of the IgG4 subclass were confirmed via ELISA. Hence, a new cycle of plasma exchange and regular rituximab treatment was initiated, with subsequent clinical improvement and serological remission. The serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) levels were assessed retrospectively and rose and fell together with the antibody titer. Discussion: This case demonstrates that autoimmunity to (para)nodal structures can reoccur especially in patients prone to autoimmune disorders and can switch its target antigen and subclass in the course of disease. The presence of auto-antibodies against different targets at the node of Ranvier has direct implications for therapeutic management. We suggest a close follow-up of patients with AN after successful therapy. In case of deterioration despite seronegativity, non-specific tests such as teased fiber assays and repeated screening for different target antigens should be considered