44 research outputs found
Establishing a comprehensive web-based analysis platform for Nicotiana benthamiana genome and transcriptome
ベンサミアナタバコの遺伝子発現データベースを構築 実験モデル植物の遺伝子解析ツールをウェブで提供. 京都大学プレスリリース. 2024-12-12.Nicotiana benthamiana has long served as a crucial plant material extensively used in plant physiology research, particularly in the field of plant pathology, because of its high susceptibility to plant viruses. Additionally, it serves as a production platform to test vaccines and other valuable substances. Among its approximately 3.1 Gb genome, 57 583 genes have been annotated within a 61 Mb region. We created a comprehensive and easy-to-use platform to use transcriptomes for modern annotation. These tools allow to visualize gene expression profiles, draw molecular evolutionary phylogenetic trees of gene families, perform functional enrichment analyses, and facilitate output downloads. To demonstrate their utility, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of enzymes within the nicotine biosynthesis pathway, a secondary metabolic pathway characteristic of the Nicotiana genus. Using the developed tool, expression profiles of the nicotine biosynthesis pathway genes were generated. The expression patterns of eight gene groups in the pathway were strongly expressed in the roots and weakly expressed in leaves and flowers of N. benthamiana. The results were consistent with the established gene expression profiles in Nicotiana tabacum and provided insights into gene family composition and expression trends. The compilation of this database tool can facilitate genetic analysis of N. benthamiana in the future
GmFT2a, a Soybean Homolog of FLOWERING LOCUS T, Is Involved in Flowering Transition and Maintenance
BACKGROUND: Flowering reversion can be induced in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), a typical short-day (SD) dicot, by switching from SD to long-day (LD) photoperiods. This process may involve florigen, putatively encoded by FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) in Arabidopsis thaliana. However, little is known about the potential function of soybean FT homologs in flowering reversion. METHODS: A photoperiod-responsive FT homologue GmFT (renamed as GmFT2a hereafter) was cloned from the photoperiod-sensitive cultivar Zigongdongdou. GmFT2a gene expression under different photoperiods was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR. In situ hybridization showed direct evidence for its expression during flowering-related processes. GmFT2a was shown to promote flowering using transgenic studies in Arabidopsis and soybean. The effects of photoperiod and temperature on GmFT2a expression were also analyzed in two cultivars with different photoperiod-sensitivities. RESULTS: GmFT2a expression is regulated by photoperiod. Analyses of GmFT2a transcripts revealed a strong correlation between GmFT2a expression and flowering maintenance. GmFT2a transcripts were observed continuously within the vascular tissue up to the shoot apex during flowering. By contrast, transcripts decreased to undetectable levels during flowering reversion. In grafting experiments, the early-flowering, photoperiod-insensitive stock Heihe27 promotes the appearance of GmFT2a transcripts in the shoot apex of scion Zigongdongdou under noninductive LD conditions. The photothermal effects of GmFT2a expression diversity in cultivars with different photoperiod-sensitivities and a hypothesis is proposed. CONCLUSION: GmFT2a expression is associated with flowering induction and maintenance. Therefore, GmFT2a is a potential target gene for soybean breeding, with the aim of increasing geographic adaptation of this crop
Structure, function, and evolution of plant NIMA-related kinases: implication for phosphorylation-dependent microtubule regulation
Fruit load modulates flowering-related gene expression in buds of alternate-bearing 'Moncada' mandarin
Background and Aims Gene determination of flowering is the result of complex interactions involving both promoters and inhibitors. In this study, the expression of flowering-related genes at the meristem level in alternate-bearing citrus trees is analysed, together with the interplay between buds and leaves in the determination of flowering.
Methods First defruiting experiments were performed to manipulate blossoming intensity in `Moncada¿ mandarin, Citrus clementina. Further defoliation was performed to elucidate the role leaves play in the flowering process. In both cases, the activity of flowering-related genes was investigated at the flower induction (November) and differentiation (February) stages.
Key Results Study of the expression pattern of flowering-genes in buds from on (fully loaded) and off (without fruits) trees revealed that homologues of FLOWERING LOCUS T (CiFT), TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF), APETALA1 (CsAP1) and LEAFY (CsLFY) were negatively affected by fruit load. CiFT and TSF activities showed a marked increase in buds from off trees through the study period (ten-fold in November). By contrast, expression of the homologues of the flowering inhibitors of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (CsTFL), TERMINAL FLOWER 2 (TFL2) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) was generally lower in off trees. Regarding floral identity genes, the increase in CsAP1 expression in off trees was much greater in buds than in leaves, and significant variations in CsLFY expression (approx. 20 %) were found only in February. Defoliation experiments further revealed that the absence of leaves completely abolished blossoming and severely affected the expression of most of the flowering-related genes, particularly decreasing the activity of floral promoters and of CsAP1 at the induction stage.
Conclusions These results suggest that the presence of fruit affects flowering by greatly altering gene-expression not only at the leaf but also at the meristem level. Although leaves are required for flowering to occur, their absence strongly affects the activity of floral promoters and identity genes.This work was supported by a grant from the Instituto Nacional Investigaciones Agrarias, Spain (RTA2009-00147). M. C. Gonzalez was the recipient of a contract by the Fundacion Agroalimed (Conselleria d'Agricultura, Pesca i Alimentacio, Generalitat Valenciana).Muñoz Fambuena, N.; Mesejo Conejos, C.; Gonzalez Más, MC.; Primo-Millo, E.; Agustí Fonfría, M.; Iglesias, DJ. (2012). Fruit load modulates flowering-related gene expression in buds of alternate-bearing 'Moncada' mandarin. Annals of Botany. 110(6):1109-1118. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs190S110911181106Abe, M. (2005). FD, a bZIP Protein Mediating Signals from the Floral Pathway Integrator FT at the Shoot Apex. Science, 309(5737), 1052-1056. doi:10.1126/science.1115983Bustin, S. (2002). Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, 23-39. doi:10.1677/jme.0.0290023Corbesier, L., & Coupland, G. (2006). The quest for florigen: a review of recent progress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(13), 3395-3403. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl095Dornelas, M. C., Camargo, R. L. B., Figueiredo, L. H. M., & Takita, M. A. (2007). A genetic framework for flowering-time pathways in Citrus spp. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 30(3 suppl), 769-779. doi:10.1590/s1415-47572007000500006Endo, T., Shimada, T., Fujii, H., Kobayashi, Y., Araki, T., & Omura, M. (2005). Ectopic Expression of an FT Homolog from Citrus Confers an Early Flowering Phenotype on Trifoliate Orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.). Transgenic Research, 14(5), 703-712. doi:10.1007/s11248-005-6632-3Esumi, T., Hagihara, C., Kitamura, Y., Yamane, H., & Tao, R. (2009). Identification of anFTortholog in Japanese apricot (Prunus mumeSieb. et Zucc.). The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 84(2), 149-154. doi:10.1080/14620316.2009.11512496Esumi, T., Kitamura, Y., Hagihara, C., Yamane, H., & Tao, R. (2010). Identification of a TFL1 ortholog in Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.). Scientia Horticulturae, 125(4), 608-616. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2010.05.016Giakountis, A., & Coupland, G. (2008). Phloem transport of flowering signals. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 11(6), 687-694. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2008.10.003Hashimoto, J. G., Beadles-Bohling, A. S., & Wiren, K. M. (2004). Comparison of RiboGreen®and 18S rRNA quantitation for normalizing real-time RT-PCR expression analysis. BioTechniques, 36(1), 54-60. doi:10.2144/04361bm06Jaeger, K. E., Graf, A., & Wigge, P. A. (2006). The control of flowering in time and space. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(13), 3415-3418. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl159Jang, S., Torti, S., & Coupland, G. (2009). Genetic and spatial interactions betweenFT,TSFandSVPduring the early stages of floral induction in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 60(4), 614-625. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03986.xJaya, E. S. K. D., Clemens, J., Song, J., Zhang, H., & Jameson, P. E. (2009). Quantitative expression analysis of meristem identity genes in Eucalyptus occidentalis: AP1 is an expression marker for flowering. Tree Physiology, 30(2), 304-312. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp117Koshita, Y., Takahara, T., Ogata, T., & Goto, A. (1999). Involvement of endogenous plant hormones (IAA, ABA, GAs) in leaves and flower bud formation of satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.). Scientia Horticulturae, 79(3-4), 185-194. doi:10.1016/s0304-4238(98)00209-xKotoda, N., Hayashi, H., Suzuki, M., Igarashi, M., Hatsuyama, Y., Kidou, S., … Abe, K. (2010). Molecular Characterization of FLOWERING LOCUS T-Like Genes of Apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Plant and Cell Physiology, 51(4), 561-575. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcq021Li, D., Liu, C., Shen, L., Wu, Y., Chen, H., Robertson, M., … Yu, H. (2008). A Repressor Complex Governs the Integration of Flowering Signals in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell, 15(1), 110-120. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.002Lord, E. M., & Eckard, K. J. (1985). Shoot Development in Citrus sinensis L. (Washington Navel Orange). I. Floral and Inflorescence Ontogeny. Botanical Gazette, 146(3), 320-326. doi:10.1086/337531Mathieu, J., Warthmann, N., Küttner, F., & Schmid, M. (2007). Export of FT Protein from Phloem Companion Cells Is Sufficient for Floral Induction in Arabidopsis. Current Biology, 17(12), 1055-1060. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.009Matsuda, N., Ikeda, K., Kurosaka, M., Takashina, T., Isuzugawa, K., Endo, T., & Omura, M. (2009). Early Flowering Phenotype in Transgenic Pears (Pyrus communis L.) Expressing the CiFT Gene. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 78(4), 410-416. doi:10.2503/jjshs1.78.410Michaels, S. D., Himelblau, E., Kim, S. Y., Schomburg, F. M., & Amasino, R. M. (2004). Integration of Flowering Signals in Winter-Annual Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 137(1), 149-156. doi:10.1104/pp.104.052811Moss, G. I. (1971). Effect of fruit on flowering in relation to biennial bearing in sweet orange(Citrus sinensis). Journal of Horticultural Science, 46(2), 177-184. doi:10.1080/00221589.1971.11514396Muñoz-Fambuena, N., Mesejo, C., Carmen González-Mas, M., Primo-Millo, E., Agustí, M., & Iglesias, D. J. (2011). Fruit regulates seasonal expression of flowering genes in alternate-bearing ‘Moncada’ mandarin. Annals of Botany, 108(3), 511-519. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr164Muñoz-Fambuena, N., Mesejo, C., González-Mas, M. C., Iglesias, D. J., Primo-Millo, E., & Agustí, M. (2012). Gibberellic Acid Reduces Flowering Intensity in Sweet Orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] by Repressing CiFT Gene Expression. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 31(4), 529-536. doi:10.1007/s00344-012-9263-yNishikawa, F., Endo, T., Shimada, T., Fujii, H., Shimizu, T., Omura, M., & Ikoma, Y. (2007). Increased CiFT abundance in the stem correlates with floral induction by low temperature in Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(14), 3915-3927. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm246Nishikawa, F., Endo, T., Shimada, T., Fujii, H., Shimizu, T., Kobayashi, Y., … Omura, M. (2010). Transcriptional changes in CiFT-introduced transgenic trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.). Tree Physiology, 30(3), 431-439. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpp122Notaguchi, M., Abe, M., Kimura, T., Daimon, Y., Kobayashi, T., Yamaguchi, A., … Araki, T. (2008). Long-Distance, Graft-Transmissible Action of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein to Promote Flowering. Plant and Cell Physiology, 49(11), 1645-1658. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcn154Peña, L., Martín-Trillo, M., Juárez, J., Pina, J. A., Navarro, L., & Martínez-Zapater, J. M. (2001). Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY or APETALA1 genes in citrus reduces their generation time. Nature Biotechnology, 19(3), 263-267. doi:10.1038/85719Pillitteri, L. J., Lovatt, C. J., & Walling, L. L. (2004). Isolation and Characterization of a TERMINAL FLOWER Homolog and Its Correlation with Juvenility in Citrus. Plant Physiology, 135(3), 1540-1551. doi:10.1104/pp.103.036178Pillitteri, L. J., Lovatt, C. J., & Walling, L. L. (2004). Isolation and Characterization of LEAFY and APETALA1 Homologues from Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck `Washington’. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 129(6), 846-856. doi:10.21273/jashs.129.6.0846Rottmann, W. H., Meilan, R., Sheppard, L. A., Brunner, A. M., Skinner, J. S., Ma, C., … Strauss, S. H. (2000). Diverse effects of overexpression of LEAFY and PTLF, a poplar (Populus) homolog of LEAFY/FLORICAULA, in transgenic poplar and Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 22(3), 235-245. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00734.xSherman, W. B., & Beckman, T. G. (2003). CLIMATIC ADAPTATION IN FRUIT CROPS. Acta Horticulturae, (622), 411-428. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2003.622.43Southerton, S. G., Strauss, S. H., Olive, M. R., Harcourt, R. L., Decroocq, V., Zhu, X., … Dennis, E. S. (1998). Plant Molecular Biology, 37(6), 897-910. doi:10.1023/a:1006056014079Sreekantan, L., & Thomas, M. R. (2006). VvFT and VvMADS8, the grapevine homologues of the floral integrators FT and SOC1, have unique expression patterns in grapevine and hasten flowering in Arabidopsis. Functional Plant Biology, 33(12), 1129. doi:10.1071/fp06144Takada, S., & Goto, K. (2003). TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis Homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, Counteracts the Activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the Vascular Tissues of Leaves to Regulate Flowering Time. The Plant Cell, 15(12), 2856-2865. doi:10.1105/tpc.016345Tan, F.-C., & Swain, S. M. (2007). Functional characterization of AP3, SOC1 and WUS homologues from citrus (Citrus sinensis). Physiologia Plantarum, 131(3), 481-495. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00971.xTränkner, C., Lehmann, S., Hoenicka, H., Hanke, M.-V., Fladung, M., Lenhardt, D., … Flachowsky, H. (2010). Over-expression of an FT-homologous gene of apple induces early flowering in annual and perennial plants. Planta, 232(6), 1309-1324. doi:10.1007/s00425-010-1254-2Vemmos, S. N. (1999). Carbohydrate content of inflorescent buds of defruited and fruiting pistachio (Pistacia vera L) branches in relation to biennial bearing. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 74(1), 94-100. doi:10.1080/14620316.1999.11511079Wada, M., Cao, Q., Kotoda, N., Soejima, J., & Masuda, T. (2002). Plant Molecular Biology, 49(6), 567-577. doi:10.1023/a:1015544207121Wigge, P. A. (2005). Integration of Spatial and Temporal Information During Floral Induction in Arabidopsis. Science, 309(5737), 1056-1059. doi:10.1126/science.1114358Yahata, D., Matsumoto, K., & Ushijima, K. (2004). Relationship between Flower-bud Differentiation and Carbohydrate Contents in Spring Shoots of Very-early, Early and Late Maturing Cultivars of Satsuma Mandarin. Engei Gakkai zasshi, 73(5), 405-410. doi:10.2503/jjshs.73.405Yamaguchi, A., Kobayashi, Y., Goto, K., Abe, M., & Araki, T. (2005). TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) Acts as a Floral Pathway Integrator Redundantly with FT. Plant and Cell Physiology, 46(8), 1175-1189. doi:10.1093/pcp/pci151Yan, J., Yuan, F., Long, G., Qin, L., & Deng, Z. (2011). Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis in citrus. Molecular Biology Reports, 39(2), 1831-1838. doi:10.1007/s11033-011-0925-9YU, Q., MOORE, P. H., ALBERT, H. H., ROADER, A. H. K., & MING, R. (2005). Cloning and characterization of a FLORICAULA/LEAFY ortholog, PFL, in polygamous papaya. Cell Research, 15(8), 576-584. doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7290327Yu, X., Klejnot, J., & Lin, C. (2006). Florigen: One Found, More to Follow? Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 48(6), 617-621. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00309.
Fruit regulates seasonal expression of flowering genes in alternate-bearing 'Moncada' mandarin
Background and Aims The presence of fruit has been widely reported to act as an inhibitor of flowering in fruit trees. This study is an investigation into the effect of fruit load on flowering of `Moncada¿ mandarin and on the expression of putative orthologues of genes involved in flowering pathways to provide insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying alternate bearing in citrus.
Methods The relationship between fruit load and flowering intensity was examined first. Defruiting experiments were further conducted to demonstrate the causal effect of fruit removal upon flowering. Finally, the activity of flowering-related genes was investigated to determine the extent to which their seasonal expression is affected by fruit yield.
Key Results First observations and defruiting experiments indicated a significant inverse relationship between preceding fruit load and flowering intensity. Moreover, data indicated that when fruit remained on the tree from November onwards, a dramatic inhibition of flowering occurred the following spring. The study of the expression pattern of flowering-genes of on (fully loaded) and off (without fruits) trees revealed that homologues of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), SUPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1), APETALA1 (AP1) and LEAFY (LFY) were negatively affected by fruit load. Thus, CiFT expression showed a progressive increase in leaves from off trees through the study period, the highest differences found from December onwards (10-fold). Whereas differences in the relative expression of SOC1 only reached significance from September to mid-December, CsAP1 expression was constantly higher in those trees through the whole study period. Significant variations in CsLFY expression only were found in late February (close to 20 %). On the other hand, the expression of the homologues of TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) did not appear to be related to fruit load.
Conclusions These results suggest for the first time that fruit inhibits flowering by repressing CiFT and SOC1 expression in leaves of alternate-bearing citrus. Fruit also reduces CsAP1 expression in leaves, and the significant increase in leaf CsLFY expression from off trees in late February was associated with the onset of floral differentiation.We thank Dr D. Westall for her help in editing the manuscript. M. C. Gonzalez was recipient of a contract by the Fundacion Agroalimed (Conselleria d'Agricultura, Pesca i Alimentacio, Generalitat Valenciana). This work was supported by a grant from the Instituto Nacional Investigaciones Agrarias, Spain (RTA2009-00147).Muñoz Fambuena, N.; Mesejo Conejos, C.; Gonzalez Más, MC.; Primo-Millo, E.; Agustí Fonfría, M.; Iglesias, DJ. (2011). Fruit regulates seasonal expression of flowering genes in alternate-bearing 'Moncada' mandarin. Annals of Botany. 108:511-519. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr164S51151910
NUCLEAR FACTOR Y, subunit A (NF-YA) proteins positively regulate flowering and act through FLOWERING LOCUS T
Photoperiod dependent flowering is one of several mechanisms used by plants to initiate the developmental transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth. The NUCLEAR FACTOR Y (NF-Y) transcription factors are heterotrimeric complexes composed of NF-YA and histone-fold domain (HFD) containing NF-YB/NF-YC, that initiate photoperiod-dependent flowering by cooperatively interacting with CONSTANS (CO) to drive the expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). This involves NF-Y and CO binding at distal CCAAT and proximal “CORE” elements, respectively, in the FT promoter. While this is well established for the HFD subunits, there remains some question over the potential role of NF-YA as either positive or negative regulators of this process. Here we provide strong support, in the form of genetic and biochemical analyses, that NF-YA, in complex with NF-YB/NF-YC proteins, can directly bind the distal CCAAT box in the FT promoter and are positive regulators of flowering in an FT-dependent manner.This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (US, http://www.nsf.gov/) award 1149822 to BFH. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Ye
