Ethnographic methods in academic libraries: A review

Research in academic libraries has recently seen an increase in the use of ethnographic-based methods to collect data. Primarily used to learn about library users and their interaction with spaces and resources, the methods are proving particularly useful to academic libraries. The data ethnographic methods retrieve is rich, context specific, and often difficult to collect via other methods. This review provides an overview of research demonstrating how ethnography can be applied to learn about a variety of issues in academic libraries, ranging from space use to a way of teaching new students about library resources and facilities

Low expression of aldehyde deyhdrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) is a prognostic marker for poor survival in pancreatic cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Aldehyde deyhdrogenase 1 (ALDH1) has been characterised as a cancer stem cell marker in different types of tumours. Additionally, it plays a pivotal role in gene regulation and endows tumour cells with augmented chemoresistance. Recently, ALDH1A1 has been described as a prognostic marker in a pancreatic cancer tissue microarray. The aim of this study was to reevaluate the expression of ALDH1A1 as a prognostic marker on whole-mount tissue sections.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Real-time-quantitative-PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting were used to evaluate the expression profile of ALDH1A1 in seven pancreatic cancer cell lines and one non-malignant pancreatic cell line. Immunostaining against ALDH1A1 and Ki-67 was performed on paraffin-embedded samples from 97 patients with pancreatic cancer. The immunohistochemical results were correlated to histopathological and clinical data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>qRT-PCR and Western blotting revealed a different expression pattern of ALDH1A1 in different malignant and non-malignant pancreatic cell lines. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that ALDH1A1 was confined to the cellular cytoplasm and occurred in 72 cases (74%), whereas it was negative in 25 cases (26%). High expression of ALDH1A1 was significantly correlated to an increased proliferation rate (Spearman correlation, p = 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that decreased expression of ALDH1A1 is an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Immunonhistochemical analysis on whole-mount tissue slides revealed that ALDH1A1 is more abundantly expressed in pancreatic cancer than initially reported by a tissue microarray analysis. Moreover, high expression of ALDH1A1 correlated significantly with the proliferation of tumour cells. Intriguingly, this study is the first which identifies low expression of ALDH1A1 as an independent adverse prognostic marker for overall survival in pancreatic cancer.</p

International Immunopharmacology

13-141751-1759

Randomized, Controlled Trial of Transdermal Clonidine for Smoking Cessation

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of clonidine versus placebo in smoking cessation. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-design comparison of transdermal clonidine with behavior modification, transdermal clonidine without behavior modification, placebo with behavior modification, and placebo without behavior modification. SETTING: Outpatient, university-based ambulatory care facility. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty generally healthy, highly nicotine-dependent cigarette smokers. INTERVENTION: Clonidine was given as the transdermal patch initiated 72 hours prior to smoking-cessation attempts and continued for six weeks thereafter. Clonidine was given at a dose of 0.2 mg/d for patients weighing more than 150 pounds (&gt;67.5 kg) and at a dose of 0.1 mg/d for patients weighing less than 150 pounds (&lt;67.5 kg). Behavior modification consisted of a total of 12 one-hour structured group training sessions. Patients not receiving behavior modification received printed material, which included the “Help Quit Kit” and the “I Quit Kit” from the American Cancer Society. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Smoking-cessation rates were assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks of follow-up. In addition, adverse reactions to clonidine or placebo were evaluated. RESULTS: Clonidine with behavior modification was statistically superior to the other three treatment groups but only at 6 weeks of follow-up. There were no differences in smoking-cessation rates among any of the treatment groups at any other follow-up intervals. Patients receiving behavior modification, regardless of whether they received clonidine, had better quit rates than patients not receiving behavior modification at all follow-up times except 52 weeks. Women receiving clonidine had significantly better quit rates than men receiving clonidine at all follow-up visits. Clonidine was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse effects than placebo (52 vs. 11 percent). However, the number of smokers withdrawing from the study was not greater with clonidine compared with placebo (9 vs. 7 percent, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Clonidine is probably not effective as a pharmacologic adjunct to behavior modification in smoking cessation. It may have a potential role in women smokers who do-not respond to or cannot tolerate more traditional smoking-cessation therapies. </jats:sec