Determinants of Health and Pediatric Primary Care Practices

More than 20% of children nationally live in poverty. Pediatric primary care practices are critical points-of-contact for these patients and their families. Practices must consider risks that are rooted in poverty as they determine how to best deliver family-centered care and move toward action on the social determinants of health. The Practice-Level Care Delivery Subgroup of the Academic Pediatric Association\u27s Task Force on Poverty has developed a roadmap for pediatric providers and practices to use as they adopt clinical practice redesign strategies aimed at mitigating poverty\u27s negative impact on child health and well-being. The present article describes how care structures and processes can be altered in ways that align with the needs of families living in poverty. Attention is paid to both facilitators of and barriers to successful redesign strategies. We also illustrate how such a roadmap can be adapted by practices depending on the degree of patient need and the availability of practice resources devoted to intervening on the social determinants of health. In addition, ways in which practices can advocate for families in their communities and nationally are identified. Finally, given the relative dearth of evidence for many poverty-focused interventions in primary care, areas that would benefit from more in-depth study are considered. Such a focus is especially relevant as practices consider how they can best help families mitigate the impact of poverty-related risks in ways that promote long-term health and well-being for children

Care coordination for children with special health care needs: Evaluation of a state experiment

Care coordination (CC), a component of the medical home, may aid families who have children with special health care needs (CSHCN). Few data link CC to individual patient outcomes. To compare parent-reported outcomes for CSHCN receiving practice-based care coordination with those receiving standard care. This cross-sectional study examined two groups of CSHCN: one that received the services of a care coordinator for a year and one that did not. Parental surveys assessed: access to medical care, practice help and support, satisfaction with services, and parental mental and physical health. Associations between group status and parent-reported outcomes were assessed via regression analyses controlling for sociodemographic and health status variables. We also examined whether CC households who reported higher satisfaction with care had higher scores in the four domains. Parents in the care coordination group reported higher utilization of both primary care and specialist physicians, but did not report better practice help and support, better satisfaction with care, or better overall parental health. Parents in the care coordination group who reported being satisfied with their care rated their PCPs as more helpful than did the comparison families. Parents in this subgroup also reported significantly higher levels of care coordination than did parents in the comparison group. CSHCN appear to have higher PCP and specialist utilization when they receive supplemental care coordination. Additionally, those who are more satisfied with the care coordination they receive are happier with the assistance from their PCP and the overall care coordination provided

Transition of adolescents with chronic health conditions to adult primary care: Factors associated with physician acceptance

PURPOSE: To assess the willingness of adult primary-care physicians to transfer young adults with special health care needs (YASHCN) into their practices, and the relative impact of patient characteristics and transition supports. METHODS: Survey of primary care internists and family practitioners using randomized patient characteristics and transition supports in clinical vignettes to assess physician willingness to accept a YASHCN into their practice. RESULTS: 404 responses were received from 601 surveys (response rate 67%). Only 44% rated themselves willing or enthusiastic to accept a YASHCN. Using four-way ANOVA testing, provider and practice characteristics significantly associated with willingness to accept included gender, years in practice, presence of YASHCN in current practice and whether the practice was accepting new patients. Patient condition and transition support significantly affected willingness to accept; training in internal medicine versus family practice did not. CONCLUSION: Physicians providing primary care for adults express limited willingness to accept YASHCN into their practices. Provider, practice and patient characteristics affected willingness to accept. Although transition supports affected willingness to accept, effects varied markedly across diagnoses and physician gender. Findings have implications for patients and healthcare teams and policy planners