40 research outputs found
Understanding biomolecular motion, recognition, and allostery by use of conformational ensembles
We review the role conformational ensembles can play in the analysis of biomolecular dynamics, molecular recognition, and allostery. We introduce currently available methods for generating ensembles of biomolecules and illustrate their application with relevant examples from the literature. We show how, for binding, conformational ensembles provide a way of distinguishing the competing models of induced fit and conformational selection. For allostery we review the classic models and show how conformational ensembles can play a role in unravelling the intricate pathways of communication that enable allostery to occur. Finally, we discuss the limitations of conformational ensembles and highlight some potential applications for the future
Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health: where do they meet?
Given the increased use of traditional medicines, possibilities that would ensure its successful integration into a public health framework should be explored. This paper discusses some of the links between biodiversity and traditional medicine, and addresses their implications to public health. We explore the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to global and human health, the risks which human impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity present to human health and welfare
Antimalarial drug targets in Plasmodium falciparum predicted by stage-specific metabolic network analysis
A method to identify the variable ecosystem services relationship across time: a case study on Yanhe Basin, China
HIV Malaria Co-Infection Is Associated with Atypical Memory B Cell Expansion and a Reduced Antibody Response to a Broad Array of Plasmodium falciparum Antigens in Rwandan Adults
HIV infected individuals in malaria endemic areas experience more frequent and severe malaria episodes compared to non HIV infected. This clinical observation has been linked to a deficiency in antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum antigens; however, prior studies have only focused on the antibody response to <0.5% of P. falciparum proteins. To obtain a broader and less-biased view of the effect of HIV on antibody responses to malaria we compared antibody profiles of HIV positive (HIV+) and negative (HIV-) Rwandan adults with symptomatic malaria using a microarray containing 824 P. falciparum proteins. We also investigated the cellular basis of the antibody response in the two groups by analyzing B and T cell subsets by flow cytometry. Although HIV malaria co-infected individuals generated antibodies to a large number of P. falciparum antigens, including potential vaccine candidates, the breadth and magnitude of their response was reduced compared to HIV- individuals. HIV malaria co-infection was also associated with a higher percentage of atypical memory B cells (MBC) (CD19+CD10-CD21-CD27-) compared to malaria infection alone. Among HIV+ individuals the CD4+ T cell count and HIV viral load only partially explained variability in the breadth of P. falciparum-specific antibody responses. Taken together, these data indicate that HIV malaria co-infection is associated with an expansion of atypical MBCs and a diminished antibody response to a diverse array of P. falciparum antigens, thus offering mechanistic insight into the higher risk of malaria in HIV+ individuals
Center-Specific Graft and Patient Survival Rates: 1997 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Report
CONTEXT: Multiple comprehensive, risk-adjusted studies evaluating
short-term surgical mortality have been reported previously. This report
analyzes short-term and long-term outcomes, both nationally and at each
individual transplant program, for all solid organ transplantations performed
in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To report graft and patient survival rates
for all solid organ transplantations, both nationally and at each specific
transplant program in the United States, and to compare the expected survival
rate with the actual survival rate of each individual program. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Multivariate regression analysis of donor and recipient factors
affecting graft and patient survival of all kidney, liver, pancreas, heart,
lung, and heart-lung transplants reported to the United Network for Organ
Sharing from 742 separate transplant programs. PATIENTS: A cohort of 97587
solid organ transplantations performed on 92966 recipients in the United
States from January 1988 through April 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term
and conditional 3-year national and individual transplant program graft and
patient survival rates overall and from 2 separate eras (era 1, January
1988-April 1992; era 2, May 1992-April 1994); comparison of actual
center-specific performance with risk-adjusted expected performance and
identification of centers with better-than-expected or worse-than-expected
survival rates. RESULTS: One-year graft follow-up exceeded 98% and
conditional 3-year follow-up exceeded 91% for all organs. Graft and patient
survival improved significantly in era 2 compared with era 1 for all cadaver
organs except heart, which remained the same. One-year cadaveric graft
survival ranged from 81.5% for heart to 61.9% for heart-lung and 3-year
conditional graft survival ranged from 91.3% for pancreas to 74.7% for lung.
The percentage of programs whose actual 1-year graft survival was not
different from or was better than their risk-adjusted expected survival ranged
from 98.3% for heart-lung to 75.7% for liver. Most kidney, liver, and heart
programs whose actual survival was significantly less than expected performed
small numbers (less than the national average) of transplantations per year.
CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival for solid organ transplantations
showed improvement over time. Conditional 3-year graft and patient survival
rates were approximately 90% for all organs except for lung and heart-lung.
The conditional 3-year survival rates were better than 1-year survival rates,
indicating the major risk after transplantation occurs in the first year. The
majority of transplant programs achieved actual survival rates not
significantly different from their expected survival rates. Center effects
were most significant within the first year after transplantation and had much
less influence on long-term survival outcomes
