Checkpoint recovery in cells: how a molecular understanding can help in the fight against cancer

Dysregulation of the cell cycle is the underlying mechanism of neoplasia. Healthy cells prevent propagation of DNA mutations to progeny by activation of cellular checkpoints, which allows time for DNA repair. On the other hand, activation of the DNA damage response is also the general principle of many current cancer treatments. Thus, recent advances in understanding how checkpoints in the cell cycle work at the molecular level open the door to new approaches to antitumor therapy

Hematopoietic stem cell fate under the influence of Ser/Thr protein phosphatases

Not available

PPM1D activity promotes the replication stress caused by cyclin E1 overexpression

Oncogene-induced replication stress has been recognized as a major cause of genome instability in cancer cells. Increased expression of cyclin E1 caused by amplification of the CCNE1 gene is a common cause of replication stress in various cancers. Protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1 delta (PPM1D) is a negative regulator of p53 and has been implicated in termination of the cell cycle checkpoint. Amplification of the PPM1D gene or frameshift mutations in its final exon promote tumorigenesis. Here, we show that PPM1D activity further increases the replication stress caused by overexpression of cyclin E1. In particular, we demonstrate that cells expressing a truncated mutant of PPM1D progress faster from G1 to S phase and fail to complete licensing of the replication origins. In addition, we show that transcription-replication collisions and replication fork slowing caused by CCNE1 overexpression are exaggerated in cells expressing the truncated PPM1D. Finally, replication speed as well as accumulation of focal DNA copy number alterations caused by induction of CCNE1 expression was rescued by pharmacological inhibition of PPM1D. We propose that increased activity of PPM1D suppresses the checkpoint function of p53 and thus promotes genome instability in cells expressing the CCNE1 oncogene.</p

PPM1D activity promotes the replication stress caused by cyclin E1 overexpression

Oncogene-induced replication stress has been recognized as a major cause of genome instability in cancer cells. Increased expression of cyclin E1 caused by amplification of the CCNE1 gene is a common cause of replication stress in various cancers. Protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1 delta (PPM1D) is a negative regulator of p53 and has been implicated in termination of the cell cycle checkpoint. Amplification of the PPM1D gene or frameshift mutations in its final exon promote tumorigenesis. Here, we show that PPM1D activity further increases the replication stress caused by overexpression of cyclin E1. In particular, we demonstrate that cells expressing a truncated mutant of PPM1D progress faster from G1 to S phase and fail to complete licensing of the replication origins. In addition, we show that transcription-replication collisions and replication fork slowing caused by CCNE1 overexpression are exaggerated in cells expressing the truncated PPM1D. Finally, replication speed as well as accumulation of focal DNA copy number alterations caused by induction of CCNE1 expression was rescued by pharmacological inhibition of PPM1D. We propose that increased activity of PPM1D suppresses the checkpoint function of p53 and thus promotes genome instability in cells expressing the CCNE1 oncogene

ENIGMA CHEK2gether Project: A Comprehensive Study Identifies Functionally Impaired CHEK2 Germline Missense Variants Associated with Increased Breast Cancer Risk

PURPOSE: Germline pathogenic variants in CHEK2 confer moderately elevated breast cancer risk (odds ratio, OR ∼ 2.5), qualifying carriers for enhanced breast cancer screening. Besides pathogenic variants, dozens of missense CHEK2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) have been identified, hampering the clinical utility of germline genetic testing (GGT). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We collected 460 CHEK2 missense VUS identified by the ENIGMA consortium in 15 countries. Their functional characterization was performed using CHEK2-complementation assays quantifying KAP1 phosphorylation and CHK2 autophosphorylation in human RPE1-CHEK2-knockout cells. Concordant results in both functional assays were used to categorize CHEK2 VUS from 12 ENIGMA case-control datasets, including 73,048 female patients with breast cancer and 88,658 ethnicity-matched controls. RESULTS: A total of 430/460 VUS were successfully analyzed, of which 340 (79.1%) were concordant in both functional assays and categorized as functionally impaired (N = 102), functionally intermediate (N = 12), or functionally wild-type (WT)-like (N = 226). We then examined their association with breast cancer risk in the case-control analysis. The OR and 95% CI (confidence intervals) for carriers of functionally impaired, intermediate, and WT-like variants were 2.83 (95% CI, 2.35-3.41), 1.57 (95% CI, 1.41-1.75), and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.08-1.31), respectively. The meta-analysis of population-specific datasets showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: We determined the functional consequences for the majority of CHEK2 missense VUS found in patients with breast cancer (3,660/4,436; 82.5%). Carriers of functionally impaired missense variants accounted for 0.5% of patients with breast cancer and were associated with a moderate risk similar to that of truncating CHEK2 variants. In contrast, 2.2% of all patients with breast cancer carried functionally wild-type/intermediate missense variants with no clinically relevant breast cancer risk in heterozygous carriers

Targeting the Checkpoint to Kill Cancer Cells

Cancer treatments such as radiotherapy and most of the chemotherapies act by damaging DNA of cancer cells. Upon DNA damage, cells stop proliferation at cell cycle checkpoints, which provides them time for DNA repair. Inhibiting the checkpoint allows entry to mitosis despite the presence of DNA damage and can lead to cell death. Importantly, as cancer cells exhibit increased levels of endogenous DNA damage due to an excessive replication stress, inhibiting the checkpoint kinases alone could act as a directed anti-cancer therapy. Here, we review the current status of inhibitors targeted towards the checkpoint effectors and discuss mechanisms of their actions in killing of cancer cells