Low visibility of Latin American repositories in Google Scholar: technical incompatibility or lack of web strategy?

The content in many repositories in Latin America fail to come up in systematic searches largely due to the inadequate use of domain names and metadata schema, find Enrique Orduña-Malea and Emilio Delgado-López-Cózar. Institutional repositories are ultimately websites and concepts such as usability, information architecture, search engine optimization, among others, should be considered in their primary design. In a context like Latin America, in which scholarly production requires extra visibility because it lies outside the academic mainstream, repositories are essential vehicles, and their low visibility could significantly affect their real use by end users

The role of ego in academic profile services: comparing Google scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID

Academic profiling services are a pervasive feature of scholarly life. Alberto Martín-Martín, Enrique Orduna-Malea and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar discuss the advantages and disadvantages of major profile platforms and look at the role of ego in how these services are built and used. Scholars validate these services by using them and should be aware that the portraits shown in these platforms depend to a great extent on the characteristics of the “mirrors” themselves

The ResearchGate Score rewards academics' active participation on the platform above their publications and citations

There are now more than 13 million users registered to the ResearchGate platform, which doubles as a venue to display one’s academic achievements and a social networking site where scientists can interact with one another. Enrique Orduna-Malea, Alberto Martín-Martín, Mike Thelwall, and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar scrutinise one of its key features, the much-maligned RG Score. While the computation of this metric is not transparent, closer analysis suggests it rewards participation in the platform, especially in its Q&A section, above all else. Is the goal of ResearchGate to reward altruism, the selfless cooperation among scientists? Or is it merely to promote interaction on its platform? Whatever the reason, it is important to remember bibliometric indicators are not neutral and potentially have consequences for the credibility of science

Aplicaciones métricas de Google Scholar para la evaluación del impacto científico.

La aparición de Google Scholar en 2004 supuso una revolución tanto en los procesos de búsqueda de información académica como en los de evaluación científica (especialmente en las áreas de las Ciencias sociales y humanas) gracias a su ingente base de datos, basada en la recopilación de cualquier documento académico online, a pesar de los errores e imprecisiones existentes en la correcta vinculación de citas. Este trabajo presenta la elaboración de diferentes productos métricos de información elaborados a partir de Google Scholar (H Index Scholar, Publishers Scholar Metrics, Journal Scholar Metrics, La Biblioteconomía Española según Google Scholar Citations) con el propósito de mostrar la potencialidad y utilidad de esta base de datos a la hora de ser utilizada por los diferentes actores involucrados en la creación, difusión y evaluación de la actividad científica

The role of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica in the cycling of trace elements

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica on the cycling of a wide set of trace elements (Ag, As, Ba, Bi, Cd, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Fe, Ga, Li, Mn, Ni, Pb, Rb, Sr, Tl, V and Zn). We measured the concentration of these trace elements in different compartments of P. oceanica (leaves, rhizomes, roots and epiphytes) in a non-polluted seagrass meadow representative of the Mediterranean and calculated the annual budget from a mass balance. We provide novel data on accumulation dynamics of many trace elements in P. oceanica compartments and demonstrate that trace element accumulation patterns are mainly determined by plant compartment rather than by temporal variability. Epiphytes were the compartment, which showed the greatest concentrations for most trace elements. Thus, they constitute a key compartment when estimating trace element transfer to higher trophic levels by P. oceanica. Trace element translocation in P. oceanica seemed to be low and acropetal in most cases. Zn, Cd, Sr and Rb were the trace elements that showed the highest release rate through decomposition of plant detritus, while Cs, Tl and Bi showed the lowest. P. oceanica acts as a sink of potentially toxic trace elements (Ni, Cr, As and Ag), which can be sequestered, decreasing their bioavailability. P. oceanica may have a relevant role in the cycling of trace elements in the Mediterranean.This study was funded by the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (IBIS Project) and facilitated by the COST Action ES0906 “Seagrass Productivity: from genes to ecosystem management”. CS was supported by the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia of Spain

Mental Maps, Occupation... Liberation? The Impact of the Israel-Palestine Conflict on the Security and Legitimacy of the State of Israel and the Struggle of Palestine

The Israel-Palestine issue has been present for decades, making it one of the world’s most prominent unresolved conflicts. Conflict for Israel-Palestine over the years has meant war, border insecurity, questions of legitimacy and sovereignty, and today, the role of the international community in the issue. One of the most paradoxical aspects of the Israel-Palestine issue is that Israel’s unequal treatment of Palestinians in the occupied territories could be against Israel’s own interests in the long run. Given this conflict, the purpose of this paper, while contextualizing the long and divided historical nature of this issue, was to focus on the role that mental maps play in Israeli, Palestinian, and other theoretical perceptions of borders and legitimacy. The paper also sought to understand the role that International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law play in the conflict. Ultimately, the paper is intended to conclude how each of these ways in which borders are established— through mental maps and through legitimate corridors— come together to impact Israeli and Palestinian state legitimacy. The research methods include both qualitative and quantitative sources, with a series of formally conducted face-to-face interviews as well as analysis of peer-reviewed books and articles. My results indicate that finding where mental maps and international law come together and intersect is the most logical approach to understanding state legitimacy. My conclusion explores how we might extrapolate potential solutions from an analysis of Israeli and Palestinian state legitimacy