Gordon Baldwin: Objects for a Landscape

‘Gordon Baldwin: Objects for a Landscape’ was a major retrospective exhibition of the work of Gordon Baldwin designed by Smith and Tatjana Marsden. Initiated by York Museums Trust, the exhibition opened at York Art Gallery in February 2012 and toured to Gallery Oldham (2012); The National Centre for Craft and Design, Lincolnshire (2012–13); Plymouth City Museum and Art Gallery (2013); and Ruthin Craft Centre (2013). During the first two months at York, 37,700 people saw the exhibition. Gordon Baldwin OBE (born 1932) is ‘one of the world’s most distinguished ceramic artists, a sculpture potter who has helped to redefine the expressive language of clay over the last fifty years’ (Whiting 2012). Internationally renowned as the UK’s most distinguished living sculptural potter, he has been influential both as an artist and teacher, and is regarded as ‘one of the last true modernists to work in clay’, moving ceramics onto a sculptural platform, away from its traditional and functional concerns (Whiting 2012). Smith’s research for the project included a series of in-depth interviews conducted with Baldwin in his studio. These explored how Baldwin conceived of his work and anticipated the way individual pieces would be presented. Smith also undertook documentary research of previous large-scale exhibitions of Baldwin’s work to develop an understanding of the motivations and aims behind previous display choices. The resulting touring exhibition of 147 individual works was the largest assemblage of Baldwin’s work ever undertaken. The unprecedented number of artworks brought together for the show gave Smith the opportunity to construct a comprehensive thematic interpretation of Baldwin’s work that foregrounded his working processes and development as an artist. Smith also gave a paper about his curation of the show, ‘Designing the landscape’, at a symposium about Baldwin and sculptural ceramics hosted by the University of York (2012)

The logic of epistemic justification

Theories of epistemic justification are commonly assessed by exploring their predictions about particular hypothetical cases – predictions as to whether justification is present or absent in this or that case. With a few exceptions, it is much less common for theories of epistemic justification to be assessed by exploring their predictions about logical principles. The exceptions are a handful of ‘closure’ principles, which have received a lot of attention, and which certain theories of justification are well known to invalidate. But these closure principles are only a small sample of the logical principles that we might consider. In this paper, I will outline four further logical principles that plausibly hold for justification and two which plausibly do not. While my primary aim is just to put these principles forward, I will use them to evaluate some different approaches to justification and (tentatively) conclude that a ‘normic’ theory of justification best captures its logic

Memorandum on the Duty of Employers to meet and confer under Fiberboard Case, circa 1979

Memo to all WCIRA consultants, about a legal doctrine regarding the employer\u27s duty in cases that would seem to involve exclusively management prerogatives (Fiberboard Case), circa 1979

Kinematically Detected Halo Streams

Clues to the origins and evolution of our Galaxy can be found in the kinematics of stars around us. Remnants of accreted satellite galaxies produce over- densities in velocity-space, which can remain coherent for much longer than spatial over-densities. This chapter reviews a number of studies that have hunted for these accretion relics, both in the nearby solar-neighborhood and the more-distant stellar halo. Many observational surveys have driven this field forwards, from early work with the Hipparcos mission, to contemporary surveys like RAVE & SDSS. This active field continues to flourish, providing many new discoveries, and will be revolutionised as the Gaia mission delivers precise proper motions for a billion stars in our Galaxy.Comment: 27 pages, 10 figures. Chapter from Springer ASSL Volume entitled "Tidal Streams in the Local Group and Beyond". Affluent readers may wish to purchase the full volume here: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-19336-

On Staging Boojum!

Boojum! was originally performed as a stage musical a dozen or so times by State Opera of South Australia, at t he 1986 Adelaide Festival of Arts; the opening night was attended by Queen Elizabeth II. It was generally regarded as a success, but I was most unhappy with the treatment it received from the director, who rewrote large parts of the show, contrary to an agreement that this would not occur

Exploring behaviour in the online environment: student perceptions of information literacy

The aim of this paper is to show how information literacy can be conceptualised as a key learning process related to discipline and academic maturity, rather than as a generic skill. Results of a small-scale study including questionnaires and observation of student behaviour are reported and analysed in relation to Bruces 'seven faces of information literacy' framework. The findings illustrate that information literacy is a highly situated practice that remains undeveloped through mandatory schooling. Some methodological issues are considered in relation to researching information literacy, including the limits of the Bruce model as a framework for analysis. We also show how decontextualised courses can foreground and privilege certain behaviours that are beneficial but that developing higher-level information literate attitudes is likely to be an iterative and contextualised process

BREEDING INCENTIVE PROGRAMS AND DEMAND FOR CALIFORNIA THOROUGHBRED RACING: THE TRADEOFF BETWEEN QUANTITY AND QUALITY

Both quantity of horses and quality stimulate demand for horse race gambling. This paper addresses the potential for a quantity/quality tradeoff due to breeding incentives for California thoroughbreds. Econometric analysis is used to assess the demand for quality and quantity of horses, and results suggest the likely net benefit of breeding incentives on the industry at large.Livestock Production/Industries,

Improving the external validity of clinical trials: the case of multiple chronic conditions

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services vision and strategic framework on multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) incorporates recommendations designed to facilitate research that will improve our knowledge about interventions and systems that will benefit individuals with MCCs (or multimorbidity). The evidence base supporting the management of patients with MCCs will be built both through intervention trials specifically designed to address multimorbidity and identification of MCCs in participants across the clinical trial range. This article specifically focuses on issues relating to external validity with specific reference to trials involving patients with MCCs. The exclusion of such patients from clinical trials has been well documented. Randomized control trials (RCTs) are considered the “gold standard” of evidence, but may have drawbacks in relation to external validity, particularly in relation to multimorbidity. It may, therefore, be necessary to consider a broader range of research methods that can provide converging evidence on intervention effects to address MCCs. Approaches can also be taken to increase the usefulness of RCTs in general for providing evidence to inform multimorbidity management. Additional improvements to RCTs would include better reporting of inclusion and exclusion criteria and participant characteristics in relation to MCCs. New trials should be considered in terms of how they will add to the existing evidence base and should inform how interventions may work in different settings and patient groups. Research on treatments and interventions for patients with MCCs is badly needed. It is important that this research includes patient-centered measures and that generalizability issues be explicitly addressed.Journal of Comorbidity 2013;3(2)30–3

Strategic Freedom, Constraint, and Symmetry in One-period Markets with Cash and Credit Payment

In order to explain in a systematic way why certain combinations of market, financial, and legal structures may be intrinsic to certain capabilities to exchange real goods, we introduce criteria for abstracting the qualitative functions of markets. The criteria involve the number of strategic freedoms the combined institutions, considered as formalized strategic games, present to traders, the constraints they impose, and the symmetry with which those constraints are applied to the traders. We pay particular attention to what is required to make these "strategic market games" well-defined, and to make various solutions computable by the agents within the bounds on information and control they are assumed to have. As an application of these criteria, we present a complete taxonomy of the minimal one-period exchange economies with symmetric information and inside money. A natural hierarchy of market forms is observed to emerge, in which institutionally simpler markets are often found to be more suitable to fewer and less-diversified traders, while the institutionally richer markets only become functional as the size and diversity of their users gets large.Strategic market games, Clearinghouses, Credit evaluation, Default

Multiphase Porous Electrode Theory

Porous electrode theory, pioneered by John Newman and collaborators, provides a useful macroscopic description of battery cycling behavior, rooted in microscopic physical models rather than empirical circuit approximations. The theory relies on a separation of length scales to describe transport in the electrode coupled to intercalation within small active material particles. Typically, the active materials are described as solid solution particles with transport and surface reactions driven by concentration fields, and the thermodynamics are incorporated through fitting of the open circuit potential. This approach has fundamental limitations, however, and does not apply to phase-separating materials, for which the voltage is an emergent property of inhomogeneous concentration profiles, even in equilibrium. Here, we present a general theoretical framework for "multiphase porous electrode theory" implemented in an open-source software package called "MPET", based on electrochemical nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Cahn-Hilliard-type phase field models are used to describe the solid active materials with suitably generalized models of interfacial reaction kinetics. Classical concentrated solution theory is implemented for the electrolyte phase, and Newman's porous electrode theory is recovered in the limit of solid-solution active materials with Butler-Volmer kinetics. More general, quantum-mechanical models of Faradaic reactions are also included, such as Marcus-Hush-Chidsey kinetics for electron transfer at metal electrodes, extended for concentrated solutions. The full equations and numerical algorithms are described, and a variety of example calculations are presented to illustrate the novel features of the software compared to existing battery models