59 research outputs found

    Use of a renal-specific oral supplement by haemodialysis patients with low protein intake does not increase the need for phosphate binders and may prevent a decline in nutritional status and quality of life

    Get PDF
    Background. Protein-energy wasting is a frequent and debilitating condition in maintenance dialysis. We randomly tested if an energy-dense, phosphate-restricted, renal-specific oral supplement could maintain adequate nutritional intake and prevent malnutrition in maintenance haemodialysis patients with insufficient intake. Methods. Eighty-six patients were assigned to a standard care (CTRL) group or were prescribed two 125-ml packs of Renilon 7.5® daily for 3 months (SUPP). Dietary intake, serum (S) albumin, prealbumin, protein nitrogen appearance (nPNA), C-reactive protein, subjective global assessment (SGA) and quality of life (QOL) were recorded at baseline and after 3 months. Results. While intention to treat analysis (ITT) did not reveal strong statistically significant changes in dietary intake between groups, per protocol (PP) analysis showed that the SUPP group increased protein (P < 0.01) and energy (P < 0.01) intakes. In contrast, protein and energy intakes further deteriorated in the CTRL group (PP). Although there was no difference in serum albumin and prealbumin changes between groups, in the total population serum albumin and prealbumin changes were positively associated with the increment in protein intake (r = 0.29, P = 0.01 and r = 0.27, P = 0.02, respectively). The SUPP group did not increase phosphate intake, phosphataemia remained unaffected, and the use of phosphate binders remained stable or decreased. The SUPP group exhibited improved SGA and QOL (P < 0.05). Conclusion. This study shows that providing maintenance haemodialysis patients with insufficient intake with a renal-specific oral supplement may prevent deterioration in nutritional indices and QOL without increasing the need for phosphate binder

    Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: implications for hepatitis C therapy BIA and hepatitis C

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Body composition analysis using phase angle (PA), determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), reflects tissue electrical properties and has prognostic value in liver cirrhosis. Objective of this prospective study was to investigate clinical use and prognostic value of BIA-derived phase angle and alterations in body composition for hepatitis C infection (HCV) following antiviral therapy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>37 consecutive patients with HCV infection were enrolled, BIA was performed, and PA was calculated from each pair of measurements. 22 HCV genotype 3 patients treated for 24 weeks and 15 genotype 1 patients treated for 48 weeks, were examined before and after antiviral treatment and compared to 10 untreated HCV patients at 0, 24, and 48 weeks. Basic laboratory data were correlated to body composition alterations.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Significant reduction in body fat (BF: 24.2 ± 6.7 kg vs. 19.9 ± 6.6 kg, genotype1; 15.4 ± 10.9 kg vs. 13.2 ± 12.1 kg, genotype 3) and body cell mass (BCM: 27.3 ± 6.8 kg vs. 24.3 ± 7.2 kg, genotype1; 27.7 ± 8.8 kg vs. 24.6 ± 7.6 kg, genotype 3) was found following treatment. PA in genotype 3 patients was significantly lowered after antiviral treatment compared to initial measurements (5.9 ± 0.7° vs. 5.4 ± 0.8°). Total body water (TBW) was significantly decreased in treated patients with genotype 1 (41.4 ± 7.9 l vs. 40.8 ± 9.5 l). PA reduction was accompanied by flu-like syndromes, whereas TBW decline was more frequently associated with fatigue and cephalgia.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>BIA offers a sophisticated analysis of body composition including BF, BCM, and TBW for HCV patients following antiviral regimens. PA reduction was associated with increased adverse effects of the antiviral therapy allowing a more dynamic therapy application.</p

    ESPEN Practical Guideline: clinical nutrition in liver disease

    Get PDF
    Desnutrición; Insuficiencia hepática aguda grave; CirrosisMalnutrition; Acute liver failure; CirrhosisDesnutrició; Insuficiència hepàtica aguda greu; CirrosiIntroducción: la Guía Práctica se basa en la actual guía científica de la ESPEN sobre nutrición clínica en las enfermedades hepáticas. Métodos: se ha reducido y transformado en diagramas de flujo para facilitar su uso en la práctica clínica. La guía está dedicada a todos los profesionales, incluidos médicos, dietistas, nutricionistas y enfermeras, que trabajan con pacientes con enfermedad hepática crónica. Resultados: la guía presenta un total de 103 pronunciamientos y recomendaciones con breves comentarios para el manejo nutricional y metabólico de pacientes con (i) insuficiencia hepática aguda grave, (ii) esteatohepatitis alcohólica, (iii) enfermedad hepática grasa no alcohólica, (iv) cirrosis hepática, y (v) cirugía o trasplante de hígado. Conclusión: las recomendaciones relacionadas con enfermedades están precedidas por recomendaciones generales sobre el diagnóstico del estado nutricional en los pacientes hepáticos y sobre las complicaciones hepáticas asociadas a la nutrición médica.Background: the Practical Guideline is based on the current scientifi c ESPEN guide on Clinical Nutrition in Liver Disease. Methods: it has been shortened and transformed into fl ow charts for easier use in clinical practice. The guideline is dedicated to all professionals including physicians, dieticians, nutritionists and nurses working with patients with chronic liver disease. Results: a total of 103 statements and recommendations are presented with short commentaries for the nutritional and metabolic management of patients with (i) acute liver failure, (ii) alcoholic steatohepatitis, (iii) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, (iv) liver cirrhosis, and (v) liver surgery/ transplantation. Disease-related recommendations are preceded by general recommendations on the diagnosis of nutritional status in liver patients and on liver complications associated with medical nutrition. Conclusion: this Practical Guideline gives guidance to health care providers involved in the management of liver disease on how to offer optimal nutritional care

    Nutritional Intervention in Chronic Liver Failure

    Full text link
    Patients suffering from chronic liver failure (CLF) frequently are malnourished and do not achieve an adequate intake of nutrients, in particular protein. Low protein intake and loss of muscle mass and function, termed sarcopenia, are indicators of a poor outcome. CLF patients, therefore, should be screened for risk of malnutrition using a validated tool, and if positive, full assessment of nutritional status is mandatory including search for sarcopenia. The main goal of nutritional intervention is to provide enough protein (1.2–1.5 g × kg&lt;sup&gt;–1&lt;/sup&gt; × day&lt;sup&gt;–1&lt;/sup&gt;) and to ensure adequate energy intake (total energy 30 kcal × kg&lt;sup&gt;–1&lt;/sup&gt; × day&lt;sup&gt;–1&lt;/sup&gt;; 1.3 × resting energy expenditure). Livers of CLF patients are deplete in glycogen and, therefore, prolonged periods of fasting (&amp;#x3e;12 h) must be avoided in order to prevent further breakdown of muscle protein for gluconeogenesis. Therefore, late evening snacks or even nocturnal oral nutritional supplements improve total body ­protein status and thus, are recommended. Nutrition intervention should be stepped up from nutrition counselling to oral nutritional supplements, to enteral tube feeding, or to parenteral nutrition as appropriate. As in other malnourished patients, the prevention of refeeding syndrome or vitamin/trace element deficiency should be taken care of.</jats:p

    Parenterale und enterale Ernährung

    Full text link

    Ernährung bei Leberzirrhose: wichtige Tipps für Klinik und Praxis

    Full text link
    AbstractLiver disease and nutritional status affect each other mutually. Hepatic function is impaired by malnutrition and can be improved by nutrition therapy. Liver cirrhosis leads to prognostically relevant malnutrition in a stage dependent manner. Protein depletion and sarcopenia are its key features. Patients with liver cirrhosis should undergo systematic screening for risk of malnutrition and if positive sarcopenia should be assessed and a nutrition plan devised. In cirrhotic patients, spontaneous food intake frequently does not meet requirements and prolonged (&gt; 12 h) periods of fasting must be avoided. In a stepwise fashion nutritional counseling, oral nutritional supplements, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition as third-line-therapy should be used. In cirrhotic patients, nutrition therapy can improve morbidity and mortality by ensuring the adequate provision of energy, protein and micronutrients.</jats:p

    Basics in Clinical Nutrition: Nutritional support in liver disease

    Full text link

    Glutamin in der Ernährungstherapie – Welche Indikation bleibt?

    Full text link

    Ernährung bei multimorbiden Patienten – Daten oder Meinungen?

    Full text link
    AbstractPolymorbidity and old age are rather the rule than the exception in hospitalised patients. Malnutrition is common in such patients and should be identified by appropriate screening and assessment measures in order to devise a nutrition plan and act accordingly. Unlike in the UK or The Netherlands, malnutrition screening and nutrition teams are not mandatory for German hospitals. Malnutrition and, in particular, sarcopenia are indicators of a nutrition associated risk or increased morbidity and mortality. Malnutrition can affect patients of any medical discipline and, therefore, is managed most efficiently by the interdisciplinary and multiprofessional nutrition team. By this approach goal directed nutrition therapy can improve morbidity and mortality of hospitalised patients.</jats:p

    Ernährung bei multimorbiden Patienten – Daten oder Meinungen?

    Full text link
    corecore