Obesity paradox in older cancer patients for middle and long-term mortality: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 2,071 patients.

11555 Background: Overweight and obesity are associated with numerous adverse health outcomes. However, among older adults, substantial literature suggests an improved survival among overweight and obese patients. This phenomenon, referred to as the “obesity paradox” remains controversial. In the context of cancer, the association between overweight/obesity and mortality is complex due to the concomitant weight loss and cachexia. We aim to assess the impact of high Body Mass Index (BMI) on mortality in a large population of older cancer patients. Methods: We studied patients aged ≥70 from the ELCAPA prospective open-cohort (2007-2016; 10 geriatric oncology clinics, Great Paris urban area). Endpoints were 12- and 48-months mortality. A variable combining BMI at cancer diagnosis and weight loss (in the 6 months preceding the diagnosis) was created. BMI categories considered: underweight, (BMI &lt; 22.4kg/m²), normal weight (BMI 22.5-24.9), overweight (BMI 25-29.9), and obese (BMI ≥30); weight loss (WL) categories: &lt; 5%, 5- &lt; 10%, ≥10%. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis were conducted in males and females. Results: A total of 2071 patients were included (mean age, 81; female, 48%; metastases, 49%; main localizations: digestive (37%), urinary (26%), breast (16%); underweight (30%), normal weight (23%), overweight (33%), obese (14%)). After adjustment for age, smoking, inpatient status, cancer site, metastasis, performance status and comorbidities, overweight women with &lt; 5% WL were at lower risk of 12- and 48-months mortality compared to normal weight women with &lt; 5% WL (aHR = 0.56; p = 0.043 and 0.65; p = 0.031, respectively). Obese women with &lt; 5% WL had a lower mortality risk only at 48-months (aHR = 0.63; p = 0.036). The obesity paradox was stronger in overweight metastatic women. Overweight or obese women with 5- &lt; 10% or ≥10% WL had no reduced risk of mortality compared to normal weight women. Overweight and obese men had no reduced risk of mortality irrespective of weight loss. Conclusions: By taking into account initial weight loss, we did not found evidence for obesity paradox in older patients with cancer except in the subgroup of women with minimal weight loss. Clinical trial information: NCT02884375. </jats:p

The obesity paradox for mid- and long-term mortality in older cancer patients: a prospective multicenter cohort study

International audienceABSTRACT Background Overweight and obesity are associated with adverse health outcomes. However, substantial literature suggests that they are associated with longer survival among older people. This “obesity paradox” remains controversial. In the context of cancer, the association between overweight/obesity and mortality is complicated by concomitant weight loss (WL). Sex differences in the relation between BMI (in kg/m2) and survival have also been observed. Objectives We studied whether a high BMI was associated with better survival, and whether the association differed by sex, in older patients with cancer. Methods We studied patients aged ≥70 y from the ELCAPA (Elderly Cancer Patients) prospective open cohort (2007–2016; 10 geriatric oncology clinics, Greater Paris urban area). The endpoints were 12- and 60-mo mortality. We created a variable combining BMI at cancer diagnosis and WL in the previous 6 mo, and considered 4 BMI categories—underweight (BMI &lt; 22.5), normal weight (BMI = 22.5–24.9), overweight (BMI = 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30)—and 3 WL categories—&lt;5% (minimal), 5% to &lt;10% (moderate), and ≥10% (severe). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted in men and women. Results A total of 2071 patients were included (mean age: 81 y; women: 48%; underweight: 30%; normal weight: 23%; overweight: 33%; obesity: 14%; predominant cancer sites: colorectal (18%) and breast (16%); patients with metastases: 49%). By multivariate analysis, obese women with WL &lt; 5% had a lower 60-mo mortality risk than normal-weight women with WL &lt; 5% (adjusted HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.86; P = 0.012). Overweight/obese women with WL ≥ 5% did not have a lower mortality risk than normal-weight women with WL &lt; 5%. Overweight and obese men did not have a lower mortality risk, irrespective of WL. Conclusions By taking account of prediagnosis WL, only older obese women with cancer with minimal WL had a lower mortality risk than their counterparts with normal weight. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02884375

Feasibility of an adapted schedule of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in elderly women with advanced ovarian cancer: A retrospective cohort.

5546 Background: The EWOC-1 trial compared Carboplatin monotherapy (C mono) to two different Carboplatin + Paclitaxel (CP) regimens (weekly or 3-weekly) in vulnerable elderly patients treated for advanced ovarian cancers (OC). This study was closed prematurely because of a worse outcome in the C mono group. Both CP regimens were equivalent in terms of feasibility and efficacy with different toxicity profiles. Optimal CP regimen in elderly patient is still unknown. Here we propose a study of another adapted regimen of CP (aCP) performed in elderly patients in our institution. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed OC patients ≥ 70 years who received a Carboplatin AUC 4-5 d1q3week + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m² d1-d8 q3week regimen between 2015 and 2019. Primary endpoint was treatment feasibility according to the EWOC-1 standard: completion of 6 courses of chemotherapy without early stopping for disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity (adverse event (AE) related to chemotherapy or treatment procedure leading either to early treatment stopping, to an unplanned hospital admission or to death or to a dose delay lasting more than 14 days or more than 2 dose reductions). Results: We identified 36 pts with a median age of 79 years (table). All patient but one had an ONCODAGE-G8 score ≤ 14, 30.6% of patients had a comorbidity Charlson’s index &gt; 4 and 52.5% had an albumin rate &lt; 35 g/L. The feasibility endpoint was met in 58.3% of patients (IC95% = [25.6; 57.8]). Main causes of treatment failure (TF) were early discontinuation because of toxicity in 6 patients (16.7%) and progressive disease in 3 patients (8.33%). Median PFS was 35.3 months (IC95% = [22.7; NR]) and median OS was 62.1 months (IC95% = [31.4.0; NR]). The most frequent AE were asthenia (all grades = 94.4%, grade 3-4 = 13.9%), anemia (all grades = 94.4%, grade 3-4 = 27.8%), neutropenia (all grades = 66.7%, grade 3-4 = 38.9%) and neuropathy sensory (all grades = 61.1%, no grade 3-4). Non high-grade-serous histological type and a poor Charlson’s score were associated with a higher rate of TF (100% and 63.6%, respectively). Conclusions: These results are consistent with the findings of the EWOC-1 trial in both CP regimens and suggest that aCP could be non-inferior with an acceptable toxicity profile. Further prospective and comparative studies are mandatory to confirm this trend and to better identify predictive factors of TF in OC elderly patients.[Table: see text] </jats:p

OUP accepted manuscript

International audienceABSTRACT Background Overweight and obesity are associated with adverse health outcomes. However, substantial literature suggests that they are associated with longer survival among older people. This “obesity paradox” remains controversial. In the context of cancer, the association between overweight/obesity and mortality is complicated by concomitant weight loss (WL). Sex differences in the relation between BMI (in kg/m2) and survival have also been observed. Objectives We studied whether a high BMI was associated with better survival, and whether the association differed by sex, in older patients with cancer. Methods We studied patients aged ≥70 y from the ELCAPA (Elderly Cancer Patients) prospective open cohort (2007–2016; 10 geriatric oncology clinics, Greater Paris urban area). The endpoints were 12- and 60-mo mortality. We created a variable combining BMI at cancer diagnosis and WL in the previous 6 mo, and considered 4 BMI categories—underweight (BMI &lt; 22.5), normal weight (BMI = 22.5–24.9), overweight (BMI = 25–29.9), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30)—and 3 WL categories—&lt;5% (minimal), 5% to &lt;10% (moderate), and ≥10% (severe). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted in men and women. Results A total of 2071 patients were included (mean age: 81 y; women: 48%; underweight: 30%; normal weight: 23%; overweight: 33%; obesity: 14%; predominant cancer sites: colorectal (18%) and breast (16%); patients with metastases: 49%). By multivariate analysis, obese women with WL &lt; 5% had a lower 60-mo mortality risk than normal-weight women with WL &lt; 5% (adjusted HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.86; P = 0.012). Overweight/obese women with WL ≥ 5% did not have a lower mortality risk than normal-weight women with WL &lt; 5%. Overweight and obese men did not have a lower mortality risk, irrespective of WL. Conclusions By taking account of prediagnosis WL, only older obese women with cancer with minimal WL had a lower mortality risk than their counterparts with normal weight. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02884375