21 research outputs found
Morphological paradigms in language processing and language disorders
We present results from two cross-modal morphological priming experiments investigating regular person and number inflection on finite verbs in German. We found asymmetries in the priming patterns between different affixes that can be predicted from the structure of the paradigm. We also report data from language disorders which indicate that inflectional errors produced by language-impaired adults and children tend to occur within a given paradigm dimension, rather than randomly across the paradigm. We conclude that morphological paradigms are used by the human language processor and can be systematically affected in language disorders
PD14 - Non-interventional 2-year study of sublingual immunotherapy in children and adolescents with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis caused by grass pollen
The Mental Representation of Inflected Words: An Experimental Study of Adjectives and Verbs in German
Clinical Outcome and Tolerability of a 2-Year Sublingual Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) with a 5-Grass Pollen Tablet in Polyallergic Patients – Real-Life Medical Practice Data
P85 ‐ Asthmatic children and adolescents treated in daily medical practice – results from a 2‐year sublingual allergen immunotherapy (AIT) study with grass pollen tablets
Patient needs and benefits of sublingual immunotherapy for grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis: an observational study
Aim: Clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy for grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis (AR) needs to translate into patient benefit. Patients & methods: Patients received Oralair (Stallergenes, Antony, France) in real-life medical practice. Patient-relevant treatment benefits were measured with the AR-specific Patient Benefit Index. Subgroups were analyzed regarding distinct patient characteristics. Results: Data of 883 patients (children, adolescents, and adults) were analyzed. The highest-ranked patient needs referred to having less AR symptoms, being able to go outdoors, and being free in the choice of leisure activities. Most patients (89.2–94.6%) attained at least minimally relevant benefit. All subgroups reported relevant benefits, with significantly higher scores in some subgroups. Conclusion: Treatment with Oralair was associated with considerable patient-relevant benefit in all age groups. </jats:p
