Material differentiation in forensic radiology with single-source dual-energy computed tomography

The goal of this study was to investigate the use of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in differentiating frequently encountered foreign material on CT images using a standard single-source CT scanner. We scanned 20 different, forensically relevant materials at two X-Ray energy levels (80 and 130kVp) on CT. CT values were measured in each object at both energy levels. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine intra-reader reliability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess significance levels between X-Ray attenuation at 80 and 130kVp. T test was used to investigate significance levels between mean HU values of individual object pairings at single energy levels of 80 and 130kVp, respectively. ANOVA revealed that the difference in attenuation between beam energies of 80kVp compared to 130kVp was statistically significant (p<0.005) for all materials except brass and lead. ICC was excellent at 80kVp (0.999, p<0.001) and at 130kVp (0.998, p<0.001). T test showed that using single energy levels of 80 and 130kVp respectively 181/190 objects pairs could be differentiated from one another based on HU measurements. Using the combined information from both energy levels, 189/190 object pairs could be differentiated. Scanning with different energy levels is a simple way to apply dual-energy technique on a regular single-energy CT and improves the ability to differentiate foreign bodies with CT, based on their attenuation value

Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?

Abstract Background The aim was to evaluate the geometric and corresponding dosimetric differences between two delineation strategies for head and neck tumors neighboring air cavities. Methods Primary gross and clinical tumor volumes (GTV and CTV) of 14 patients with oropharynx or larynx tumors were contoured using a soft tissue window (S). In a second strategy, the same volumes were contoured with an extension to include the parts which became visible on lung window (L). For the calculation of Hausdorff-distances (HD) between contoured volumes of the two strategies, triangular meshes were exported. Two radiotherapy plans with identical goals and optimization parameters were generated for each case. Plan_S were optimized on CTV_S, and Plan_L on CTV_L. The dose coverages of CTV_L and CTV_Δ (CTV_L minus CTV_S) were evaluated in Plan_S. OAR doses were compared among Plan_S and Plan_L. Results Median three-dimensional HD for GTVs and CTVs were 5.7 (±2.6) and 9.3 (±2.8) mm, respectively. The median volume differences between structures contoured using L and S windows were 9% (±5%) and 9% (±4%) for GTV and CTV, respectively. In 13 out of 14 cases, Plan_S met the plan acceptance criteria for CTV_L. In 8 cases CTV_Δ was covered insufficiently in Plan_S. Mean and median differences in OAR dose-volume histogram parameters between Plan_S and Plan_L were within 3%. Conclusion For the current practice in radiotherapy planning for head and neck cancer, the delineation of L-based volumes seems unnecessary. However, in special settings, where smaller or no PTV margins are used, this approach may play an important role for local control

SOPRANO: Macitentan in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Macitentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) approved for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). SOPRANO evaluated the efficacy and safety of macitentan versus placebo in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. SOPRANO was a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients with an LVAD implanted within the prior 90 days who had persistent PH (i.e., mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP] ≤18 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] \u3e3 Wood units [WU]) were randomized (1:1) to macitentan 10 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in PVR. Secondary endpoints included change in right-heart catheterization hemodynamic variables, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels, World Health Organization functional class, and safety/tolerability. Fifty-seven patients were randomized to macitentan (n = 28) or placebo (n = 29). A statistically significant reduction in PVR from baseline to Week 12 was observed with macitentan versus placebo (placebo-corrected geometric mean ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–0.94; p = .0158). No statistically significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. In a post-hoc analysis, 66.7% of patients receiving macitentan achieved PVR 40.0% receiving placebo (p = .0383). Macitentan was generally well tolerated; adverse events were consistent with those in previous PAH studies with macitentan. In conclusion, macitentan showed promising tolerability and significantly reduced PVR in PH patients with persistently elevated PVR after LVAD implantation. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT02554903

The Nuts and Bolts of Interpreting Hemodynamics in Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Diastolic Heart Failure

With the widespread application of transthoracic echocardiography as a screening tool for pulmonary hypertension (PH), we have come to appreciate the prevalence of PH associated with diastolic heart failure. Diastolic heart failure (DHF, sometimes called heart failure with preserved, or normal, left ventricular ejection fraction [HFpEF]) is quite common, and PH appears to be a fairly frequent component of DHF.1–3 The epidemiology of these conditions is described in the article by Dr Soto in this issue of Advances. There is a complex relationship between DHF and PH: the 2 may exist independent of each other or in combination; and when they exist in combination, the PH may be in proportion or out of proportion to the DHF. Cardiac catheterization is critical in differentiating among these patterns, and this distinction may lead to important modifications in treatment strategy. This requires, however, a full understanding of the proper performance and interpretation of cardiac catheterization, as well as the potential pitfalls that can limit the utility of the procedure. This article will discuss these aspects of cardiac catheterization as they pertain to patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and PH associated with DHF. A number of important aspects of cardiac catheterization are not covered here due to space limitations but can be obtained in a more detailed text.4</jats:p

Pulmonary Hypertension in the Intensive Care Unit

Pulmonary hypertension occurs as the result of disease processes increasing pressure within the pulmonary circulation, eventually leading to right ventricular failure. Patients may become critically ill from complications of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure or may develop pulmonary hypertension as the result of critical illness. Diagnostic testing should evaluate for common causes such as left heart failure, hypoxemic lung disease and pulmonary embolism. Relatively few patients with pulmonary hypertension encountered in clinical practice require specific pharmacologic treatment of pulmonary hypertension targeting the pulmonary vasculature. Management of right ventricular failure involves optimization of preload, maintenance of systemic blood pressure and augmentation of inotropy to restore systemic perfusion. Selected patients may require pharmacologic therapy to reduce right ventricular afterload by directly targeting the pulmonary vasculature, but only after excluding elevated left heart filling pressures and confirming increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Critically-ill patients with pulmonary hypertension remain at high risk of adverse outcomes, requiring a diligent and thoughtful approach to diagnosis and treatment. </jats:p